We analyze a category of problems that is of interest in many physical situations, including those encountered in introductory physics classes: systems with two well-delineated parts that exchange energy, eventually reaching a shared equilibrium with a loss of mechanical or electrical energy. Such systems can be constrained by a constant of the system (e.g., mass, charge, momentum, or angular momentum) that uniquely determines the mechanical or electrical energy of the equilibrium state, regardless of the dissipation mechanism. A representative example would be a perfectly inelastic collision between two objects in one dimension, for which momentum conservation requires that some of the initial kinetic energy is dissipated by conversion to thermal or other forms as the two objects reach a common final velocity. We discuss how this feature manifests in a suite of four well-known and disparate problems that all share a common mathematical formalism. These examples, in which the energy dissipated during the process can be difficult to solve directly from dissipation rates, can be approached by students in a first-year physics class by considering conservation laws and can therefore be useful for teaching about energy transformations and conserved quantities. We then illustrate how to extend this method by applying it to a final example.

1.
R. P.
Bauman
, “
Physics that textbook writers usually get wrong
,”
Phys. Teach.
30
(
5
),
264
269
(
1992
).
2.
R. P.
Bauman
, “
Physics that textbook writers usually get wrong: II. Heat and energy
,”
Phys. Teach.
30
(
6
),
353
356
(
1992
).
3.
R.
Chabay
,
B.
Sherwood
, and
A.
Titus
, “
A unified, contemporary approach to teaching energy in introductory physics
,”
Am. J. Phys.
87
(
7
),
504
509
(
2019
).
4.
J. W.
Jewett
, “
Energy and the confused student IV: A global approach to energy
,”
Phys. Teach.
46
(
4
),
210
217
(
2008
).
5.
L.
Seeley
,
S.
Vokos
, and
E.
Etkina
, “
Examining physics teacher understanding of systems and the role it plays in supporting student energy reasoning
,”
Am. J. Phys.
87
(
7
),
510
519
(
2019
).
6.
R. G.
Tobin
,
S. J.
Lacy
,
S.
Crissman
,
N.
Haddad
,
O.
Wentink
, and
L.
Seeley
, “
Where does energy go when it's ‘gone’? Promoting understanding of energy dissipation
,”
Am. J. Phys.
87
(
7
),
569
576
(
2019
).
7.
A.
Bonanno
,
M.
Camarca
, and
P.
Sapia
, “
Reaching equilibrium: The role of dissipation in analogous systems, within a thermodynamic-like perspective
,”
Eur. J. Phys.
33
(
6
),
1851
1869
(
2012
).
8.
P.
Jain
, “
Energy loss while conserving angular momentum
,”
Phys. Educ.
47
(
5
),
518
520
(
2012
).
9.
C. V.
Raman
, “
On some applications of Hertz's theory of impact
,”
Phys. Rev.
15
,
277
284
(
1920
).
10.
W.
Goldsmith
,
Impact: The Theory and Physical Behaviour of Colliding Solids
(
Edward Arnold Ltd
.,
London
,
1960
).
11.
M.
Pasha
,
S.
Dogbe
,
C.
Hare
,
A.
Hassanpour
, and
M.
Ghadiri
, “
A linear model of elasto-plastic and adhesive contact deformation
,”
Granular Matter
16
,
151
162
(
2014
).
12.
T.
Schwager
and
T.
Pöschel
, “
Coefficient of restitution and linear dashpot model revisited
,”
Granular Matter
9
,
465
469
(
2007
).
13.
H.
Hertz
, “
Ueber die berührung fester elasticher körper
,”
J. Reine Angew. Math.
92
,
156
171
(
1881
), see https://home.uni-leipzig.de/pwm/web/download/Hertz1881.pdf.
14.
A. D.
Renzo
and
F. P. D.
Maio
, “
Comparison of contact-force models for the simulation of collisions in DEM-based granular flow codes
,”
Chem. Eng. Sci.
59
(
3
),
525
541
(
2004
).
15.
C. E.
Mungan
, “
Frictional torque on a rotating disc
,”
Eur. J. Phys.
33
(
5
),
1119
1123
(
2012
).
16.
R. A.
Serway
and
J. W.
Jewett
,
Physics for Scientists and Engineers
, 6th ed. (
Brooks/Cole-Thomson Learning
,
Belmont, CA
,
2004
).
17.
J. S.
Walker
,
Physics
, 3rd ed. (Instructor's Edition) (
Prentice Hall
,
Upper Saddle River, NJ
,
2007
).
18.
B. R.
Munson
,
D. F.
Young
,
T. H.
Okiishi
, and
W. W.
Huebsch
,
Fundamentals of Fluid Mechanics
, 6th ed. (
John Wiley & Sons, Inc
.,
Hoboken, NJ
,
2009
).
19.
H. U.
Fuchs
,
The Dynamics of Heat: A Unified Approach to Thermodynamics and Heat
(
Springer-Verlag
,
New York, NY
,
2010
).
20.
T. B.
Boykin
,
D.
Hite
, and
N.
Singh
, “
The two-capacitor problem with radiation
,”
Am. J. Phys.
70
,
415
420
(
2002
).
21.
K.
Mita
and
M.
Boufaida
, “
Ideal capacitor circuits and energy conservation
,”
Am. J. Phys.
67
,
737
739
(
1999
).
22.
A.
Gangopadhyaya
and
J. V.
Mallow
, “
Comment on ‘Ideal capacitor circuits and energy conservation’ [Am. J. Phys. 67(8), 737–739 (1999)]
,”
Am. J. Phys.
68
,
670
672
(
2000
).
23.
T. C.
Choy
, “
Capacitors can radiate: Further results for the two-capacitor problem
,”
Am. J. Phys.
72
,
662
670
(
2004
).
24.
J.
Bougie
and
A.
Gangopadhyaya
, “
Capacitor discharge: A hydrodynamic analog
,”
Am. J. Phys./Eur. J. Phys.
(submitted).
AAPT members receive access to the American Journal of Physics and The Physics Teacher as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.