We discuss Young's double-slit experiment using a partially coherent light source consisting of a helium-neon laser incident on a rotating piece of white paper. Such an experiment is appropriate for undergraduate students as an independent project or as part of an advanced lab course. As is well known, the resulting interference pattern is observed to disappear and return, depending on the angular size of the source. Interestingly, while the standard theoretical prediction for the light intensity agrees quite well with experimental data when the fringe visibility is high, the prediction is noticeably off when the visibility is low. A first-principles calculation of the light intensity is performed and shown to agree extremely well with the experimental results for all visibilities.

1.
We note that Al-Hasan Ibn al-Haytham (“Alhazen”) is generally credited with putting forth the first theory of light as particles during the beginning of the 11th century; see John Gribbin,
Q is for Quantum: An Encyclopedia of Particle Physics
(
Touchstone
,
New York
,
1998
), p.
15
.
2.
T.
Young
, “
The Bakerian lecture. Experiments and calculations relative to physical optics
,”
Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London
94
,
1
16
(
1804
).
3.
W.
Schneider
, “
Bringing one of the great moments of science to the classroom
,”
Phys. Teach.
24
,
217
219
(
1986
).
4.
At a more advanced level, the double-slit experiment can also be used to demonstrate that single photons interfere with themselves when passing through a double-slit aperture; see
R. S.
Aspden
,
M. J.
Padgett
, and
G. C.
Spalding
, “
Video recording true single-photon double-slit interference
,”
Am. J. Phys.
84
,
671
677
(
2016
).
5.
E.
Hecht
,
Optics
,
3rd ed.
(
Addison Wesley
,
New York
,
1998
), p.
396
.
6.
Reference 5, p. 459.
7.
B. J.
Thompson
and
E.
Wolf
, “
Two-beam interference with partially coherent light
,”
J. Opt. Soc. Am.
47
,
895
902
(
1957
).
8.
J. P.
Sharpe
and
D. P.
Collins
, “
Demonstration of optical spatial coherence using a variable width source
,”
Am. J. Phys.
79
,
554
557
(
2011
).
9.
A useful discussion of rotating diffusers can be found in
W.
Martienssen
and
E.
Spiller
, “
Coherence and fluctuations in light beams
,”
Am. J. Phys.
32
,
919
926
(
1964
).
10.

For coherent sources one adds the fields before squaring to get the intensity. For incoherent sources the random phase relationship means the “interference term” time-averages to zero. The result is a superposition of intensities for incoherent sources.

11.

Reference 5, pp. 562–566.

12.
B. J.
Thompson
, “
Illustration of the phase change in two-beam interference with partially coherent light
,”
J. Opt. Soc. Am.
48
,
95
97
(
1958
).
13.

Reference 5, pp. 566–571.

14.

Reference 5, pp. 572–573.

15.
Max
Born
and
Emil
Wolf
,
Principles of Optics
,
7th ed.
(
Cambridge U.P.
,
Cambridge
,
1999
), pp.
572
577
.
16.
B. J.
Pearson
and
D. P.
Jackson
, “
A hands-on introduction to single photons and quantum mechanics for undergraduates
,”
Am. J. Phys.
78
,
471
484
(
2010
).
17.
Educational single-photon counting modules manufactured by Exelitas technologies can be purchased at a reduced cost through the Advanced Laboratory Physics Association (ALPhA); see <https://advlab.org/spqm> for additional information. The use of such detectors could be used in other “low-light” experiments as well.
18.
The Altera DE2 is a commercially produced development and education board. Users must load a program onto the board in order to interface with LabVIEW. We used a coincidence-counting program developed by Mark Beck for single-photon quantum mechanics experiments. For additional information, see Ref. 16 and/or Mark Beck's webpage <http://people.whitman.edu/∼beckmk/QM/>.
19.

Our HeNe laser power was reasonably stable; measurements over a 10-minute time period showed a power drift of less than 1%.

20.
B. J.
Thompson
and
R.
Sudol
, “
Finite-aperture effects in the measurement of the degree of coherence
,”
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A
1
,
598
604
(
1984
).
21.
A. S.
Marathay
and
D. B.
Pollock
, “
Young's interference fringes with finite-sized sampling apertures
,”
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A
1
,
1057
1059
(
1984
).
22.
D.
Bloor
, “
Coherence and correlation–Two advanced experiments in optics
,”
Am. J. Phys.
32
,
936
941
(
1964
).
23.
S.
Mallick
, “
Degree of coherence in the image of a quasi-monochromatic source
,”
Appl. Opt.
6
,
1403
1405
(
1967
).
24.
D. N.
Grimes
, “
Measurement of the second-order degree of coherence by means of a wavefront shearing interferometer
,”
Appl. Opt.
10
,
1567
1570
(
1971
).
25.
B.
Tom King
and
W.
Tobin
, “
Charge-coupled device detection of two-beam interference with partially coherent light
,”
Am. J. Phys.
62
,
133
137
(
1994
).
26.
D.
Ambrosini
,
G. S.
Spagnolo
,
D.
Paoletti
, and
S.
Vicalvi
, “
High-precision digital automated measurement of degree of coherence in the Thompson and Wolf experiment
,”
Pure Appl. Opt.
7
,
933
939
(
1998
).
27.
The sine integral function is one of the so-called trigonometric integrals, all similarly defined; see <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trigonometric_integral> for additional information.
28.
B. J.
Pearson
,
N.
Ferris
,
R.
Strauss
,
H.
Li
, and
D. P.
Jackson
, “
Measurements of slit-width effects in Young's double-slit experiment for a partially-coherent source
,” (to be published).
AAPT members receive access to the American Journal of Physics and The Physics Teacher as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.