Games are useful tools for introducing new concepts to students. This paper describes a competitive two-player game for sophomore students in a modern physics survey course or junior/senior students in an introductory quantum mechanics course to build intuition and quantitative understanding of the probabilistic nature of quantum measurements in two-level systems such as qubits or the Stern–Gerlach experiment. The goal of the game is to guess a quantum state secretly chosen from a given set in the fewest number of measurements. It uses 20-sided dice or other classical random number generators to simulate quantum measurements. The Bloch vector formalism is introduced to give a geometric description of the quantum states and measurement outcomes. Several ready-to-use sets of quantum states are given, so readers can jump right in and try the game themselves without any prior knowledge of quantum mechanics. More advanced students can also use the game in suggested follow-up exercises to deepen students' understanding of quantum measurements and their statistical description.

1.
Guangtian
Zhu
and
Chandralekha
Singh
, “
Improving students' understanding of quantum measurement. I. Investigation of difficulties
,”
Phys. Rev. Spec. Top.–Phys. Educ. Res.
8
(
1
),
010117
(
2012
).
2.
Chandralekha
Singh
and
Emily
Marshman
, “
Review of student difficulties in upper-level quantum mechanics
,”
Phys. Rev. Spec. Top.-Phys. Educ. Res.
11
(
2
),
1
24
(
2015
); and references therein.
3.
Guangtian
Zhu
and
Chandralekha
Singh
, “
Improving students' understanding of quantum mechanics via the Stern–Gerlach experiment
,”
Am. J. Phys.
79
(
5
),
499
507
(
2011
).
4.
Frederick W.
Strauch
, “
Resource letter QI-1: Quantum information
,”
Am. J. Phys.
84
(
7
),
495
507
(
2016
), particularly, Sect. II.
5.
T. F.
Havel
 et al., “
Quantum information processing by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy
,”
Am. J. Phys.
70
(
3
),
345
362
(
2002
).
6.
John S.
Townsend
,
A Modern Approach to Quantum Mechanics
, 2nd ed. (
University Science Books
,
Mill Valley
,
2012
).
7.
David H.
McIntyre
,
Corrine A.
Manogue
, and
Janet
Tate
,
Quantum Mechanics: A Paradigms Approach
(
Pearson Education
,
San Fransisco
,
2012
).
8.
Antje
Kohnle
 et al., “
A new introductory quantum mechanics curriculum
,”
Eur. J. Phys.
35
(
1
),
015001
(
2014
).
9.
Homeyra R.
Sadaghiani
, “
Spin first vs. position first instructional approaches to teaching introductory quantum mechanics
,” in
2016 Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings
(American Association of Physics Teachers,
2016
), pp.
292
295
.
10.
S. B.
McKagan
 et al., “
Developing and researching PhET simulations for teaching quantum mechanics
,”
Am. J. Phys.
76(2008)
,
406
417
(
2008
).
11.
Daniel V.
Schroeder
and
Thomas A.
Moore
, “
A computer-simulated Stern–Gerlach laboratory
,”
Am. J. Phys.
61
(
9
),
798
805
(
1993
).
12.
Wolfgang
Dür
and
Stefan
Heusler
, “
Visualization of the invisible: The qubit as key to quantum physics
,”
Phys. Teacher
52
(
8
),
489
492
(
2014
).
13.
Antje
Kohnle
,
Charles
Baily
,
Anna
Campbell
, and
Natalia
Korolkova
, “
Enhancing student learning of two-level quantum systems with interactive simulations
,”
Am. J. Phys.
83
(
6
),
560
566
(
2015
).
14.
Katarzyna
Rycerz
,
Joanna
Patrzyk
,
Bartłomiej
Patrzyk
, and
Marian
Bubak
, “
Teaching quantum computing with the QuIDE simulator
,”
Procedia Comput. Sci.
51
,
1724
1733
(
2015
).
15.
Allan
Goff
, “
Quantum tic-tac-toe: A teaching metaphor for superposition in quantum mechanics
,”
Am. J. Phys.
74
(
11
),
962
973
(
2006
).
16.
Jeffrey A.
Phillips
, “
The macro and micro of it is that entropy is the spread of energy
,”
Phys. Teach.
54
(
6
),
344
347
(
2016
).
17.
Todd
Timberlake
, “
The statistical interpretation of entropy: An activity
,”
Phys. Teach.
48
(
8
),
516
519
(
2010
).
18.
Benicio
de Barros Neto
, “
Dice throwing as an analogy for teaching quantum mechanics
,”
J. Chem. Educ.
61
(
12
),
1044
1045
(
1984
).
19.
Patrick E.
Fleming
, “
A quantum mechanical game of craps: Teaching the superposition principle using a familiar classical analog to a quantum mechanical system
,”
J. Chem. Educ.
78(1)
,
57
60
(
2001
).
20.
Wolfgang
Dür
and
Stefan
Heusler
, “
The qubit as key to quantum physics Part II: Physical realizations and applications
,”
Phys. Teach.
54
(
3
),
156
159
(
2016
).
21.
N.
David Mermin
, “
From Cbits to Qbits: Teaching computer scientists quantum mechanics
,”
Am. J. Phys.
71
(
1
),
23
30
(
2003
).
22.
David
Cook
and
Mike
Breault
,
Advanced Dungeons & Dragons: Player's Handbook
, 2nd ed. (
TSR
,
Lake Geneva
,
1989
).
23.
F.
Bloch
, “
Nuclear induction
,”
Phys. Rev.
70
(
7–8
),
460
474
(
1946
).
24.
Isaac L.
Chuang
and
Michael A.
Nielsen
,
Quantum Computation and Quantum Information
(
Cambridge U.P.
,
Cambridge
,
2001
).
25.
Todd A.
Brun
, “
A simple model of quantum trajectories
,”
Am. J. Phys.
70
(
7
),
719
737
(
2002
).
26.
Martin
Frimmer
and
Lukas
Novotny
, “
The classical Bloch equations
,”
Am. J. Phys.
82
(
10
),
947
954
(
2014
).
27.
James M.
Supplee
, “
Optical Bloch equations: Informal motivation without the Schrödinger equation
,”
Am. J. Phys.
68
(
2
),
180
185
(
2000
).
28.
Alberto G.
Rojo
and
Anthony M.
Bloch
, “
The rolling sphere, the quantum spin, and a simple view of the Landau–Zener problem
,”
Am. J. Phys.
78
(
10
),
1014
1022
(
2010
).
29.
J.-E.
Wegrowe
and
M.-C.
Ciornei
, “
Magnetization dynamics, gyromagnetic relation, and inertial effects
,”
Am. J. Phys.
80
(
7
),
607
611
(
2012
).
30.
Joshua A.
Jones
 et al., “
The Poincaré-sphere approach to polarization: Formalism and new labs with Poincaré beams
,”
Am. J. Phys.
84
(
11
),
822
835
(
2016
).
31.
Charles
Kittel
,
Introduction to Solid State Physics
, 8th ed. (
Wiley
,
Hoboken, NJ
,
2004
), Chap. 13.
32.
Larry
Engelhardt
, “
Magnetic resonance: Using computer simulations and visualizations to connect quantum theory with classical concepts
,”
Am. J. Phys.
83
(
12
),
1051
1056
(
2015
).
33.
Wu-Ki
Tung
,
Group Theory in Physics
(
World Scientific
,
Singapore
,
1985
).
34.
Bretislav
Friedrich
and
Dudley
Herschbach
, “
Stern and Gerlach: How a bad cigar helped reorient atomic physics
,”
Phys. Today
56
(
12
),
53
59
(
2003
).
35.
Sean
Wallis
, “
Binomial confidence intervals and contingency tests: Mathematical fundamentals and the evaluation of alternative methods
,”
J. Quant. Linguist.
20
(
3
),
178
208
(
2013
).
36.
Statistically speaking, the simulation represents three independent Bernoulli processes with probabilities Px(+1),Py(+1), and Pz(+1), where the values of the probabilities are related to each other by the normalization constraint that the length of the Bloch vector equals one. This constraint complicates the problem of estimating the state s from measurement data—naïve application of Eqs. (4) and (5) can yield nonphysical estimates of the state that violate the normalization constraint sx2+sy2+sz2=1.
37.
The students were six sophomore students in a Modern Physics survey course and eleven junior/senior students in an Introductory Quantum Mechanics course taught from the spins-first perspective using Ref. 7 as the primary textbook.
38.
David J.
Griffiths
,
Introduction to Quantum Mechanics
, 2nd ed. (
Pearson Education
,
Harlow
,
2004
).
AAPT members receive access to the American Journal of Physics and The Physics Teacher as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.