Treatments of lens aberrations tend to be either short and descriptive surveys or detailed theoretical treatments. In this article, we take an intermediate approach, showing that the mechanism of spherical aberration can be easily understood on a qualitative level by comparing a sphere with the ideal lens shape prescribed by the Principle of Least Time, and by using a similar argument to understand coma aberration. We also use a simple argument from radiant flux conservation to explain why aberration-free imaging of finite-sized flat objects (as opposed to discrete points or curves) is impossible with just a single thin lens, and we provide a simple explanation of the Abbe Sine Condition as a figure of merit in aberration correction.

1.
F. A.
Jenkins
and
H. E.
White
,
Fundamentals of Optics
(
McGraw-Hill
,
New York
,
1976
).
2.
E.
Hecht
,
Optics
(
Addison-Wesley
,
Reading, MA
,
2002
).
3.
F. L.
Pedrotti
,
L. S.
Pedrotti
, and
L. M.
Pedrotti
,
Introduction to Optics
(
Pearson Prentice Hall
,
Upper Saddle River, NJ
,
2007
).
4.
Ariel
Lipson
,
Stephen G.
Lipson
, and
Henry
Lipson
,
Optical Physics
(
Cambridge U.P.
,
Cambridge
,
2010
).
5.
W.
Smith
,
Modern Optical Engineering
, 4th ed. (
McGraw-Hill Education
,
New York
,
2007
).
6.
R.
Kingslake
and
R. B.
Johnson
,
Lens Design Fundamentals
(
Elsevier Science
,
Amsterdam
,
2009
).
7.
J. B.
Pendry
, “
Negative refraction makes a perfect lens
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
85
,
3966
3969
(
2000
).
8.
H. A.
Buchdahl
,
An Introduction to Hamiltonian Optics
(
Dover Publications
,
New York
,
1993
).
9.
Max
Born
,
Emil
Wolf
, and
A. B.
Bhatia
,
Principles of Optics: Electromagnetic Theory of Propagation, Interference and Diffraction of Light
, 7th ed. (
Cambridge U.P.
,
New York
,
1999
), pp. xxxiii, p.
952
.
10.
J.
Higbie
, “
Microscope resolution
,”
Am. J. Phys.
49
,
40
42
(
1981
).
11.
Jack
Higbie
, “
Abbe's sine theorem from a thermodynamic and Fourier transform argument
,”
Am. J. Phys.
49
,
788
789
(
1981
).
12.
Edward Harrington Lockwood
,
A Book of Curves
(
Cambridge U.P.
,
Cambridge
,
1961
).
13.

Ref. 2, p. 234.

14.

Ref. 2, p. 151.

15.

Ref. 4, p. 83.

16.

Ref. 1, p. 166.

17.
A free version is available for educational use <http://www.lambdares.com/oslo>.
18.

Ref. 1, p. 159.

19.
For instance, Ref. 3 p. 446. This guideline is often found in manuals produced by optics manufacturers (e.g., https://www.edmundoptics.com/resources/application-notes/optics/understanding-optical-lens-geometries/, accessed March 27, 2018) and even on Wikipedia, which states that “a plano-convex lens, which is used to focus a collimated beam, produces a sharper focal spot when used with the convex side towards the beam source.” (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lens_(optics), accessed March 27, 2018).
20.

Ref. 1, p. 165.

21.

For finite object and image distances, it is straightforward to compute the scale factor. If either the object or image is at infinity it is necessary to take a limit. In the case of an object at infinity, s2s1/s2+s11, and for an image at infinity s2s1/s2+s11.

22.
A.
Walther
, “
Irreducible aberrations of a lens used for a range of magnifications
,”
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A
6
,
415
422
(
1989
).
23.
Roland
Winston
,
Juan C
Miñano
,
Pablo G
Benitez
, et al.,
Nonimaging Optics
(
Academic Press
,
Burlington, MA
,
2005
).
24.
T. J.
Yoder
and
G. S.
Adkins
, “
Resolution of the ellipsoid paradox in thermodynamics
,”
Am. J. Phys.
79
,
811
818
(
2011
).
25.
W. T.
Welford
and
R.
Winston
, “
The ellipsoid paradox in thermodynamics
,”
J. Stat. Phys.
28
,
603
606
(
1982
).
AAPT members receive access to the American Journal of Physics and The Physics Teacher as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.