In his Discorsi, Galileo aimed to correct centuries of Aristotelian “unreason” concerning the physics of falling objects by introducing a thought experiment that pointed out contradictions when combinations of one light and one heavy body are dropped. Inspired by Galileo's story, we sought to formulate research questions and design experiments for students to enable independent learning based on the history of science. The experiments involve commonly used or inexpensive equipment and free software, and show that Aristotle and Galileo did not disagree about falling objects, but were focusing on different kinds of motion. We assess data generated by high-speed video motion tracking of the fall of various combinations of simple handmade paper cones, following closely the discussion between Simplicio, Salviati and Sagredo in the Discorsi, and demonstrate that every statement in Galileo's reductio ad absurdum holds true and that his argument is in fact free of contradiction.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
December 2018
PAPERS|
December 01 2018
Using history to foster critical scientific thinking: Aristotle and Galileo's debate resolved through high-speed motion tracking in the classroom
Josef M. Stadlbauer;
Josef M. Stadlbauer
a)
Department of Soft Matter Physics, Johannes Kepler University Linz
, Altenberger Str. 69, 4040 Linz, Austria
Search for other works by this author on:
Lukas Kehrer;
Lukas Kehrer
Department of Soft Matter Physics, Johannes Kepler University Linz
, Altenberger Str. 69, 4040 Linz, Austria
Search for other works by this author on:
Siegfried Bauer
Siegfried Bauer
b)
Department of Soft Matter Physics, Johannes Kepler University Linz
, Altenberger Str. 69, 4040 Linz, Austria
Search for other works by this author on:
a)
Electronic mail: josef.stadlbauer@jku.at
b)
Electronic mail: sbauer@jku.at
Am. J. Phys. 86, 903–908 (2018)
Article history
Received:
April 19 2018
Accepted:
September 20 2018
Citation
Josef M. Stadlbauer, Lukas Kehrer, Siegfried Bauer; Using history to foster critical scientific thinking: Aristotle and Galileo's debate resolved through high-speed motion tracking in the classroom. Am. J. Phys. 1 December 2018; 86 (12): 903–908. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.5062167
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
A simple model of a gravitational lens from geometric optics
Bogdan Szafraniec, James F. Harford
Playing with active matter
Angelo Barona Balda, Aykut Argun, et al.
The physics of “everesting” on a bicycle
Martin Bier
The hardest-hit home run?
Donald C. Warren
Related Content
A dialogue in paradise: John Milton’s visit with Galileo
The Physics Teacher (March 2001)
Aristotle and the Physics Student
American Journal of Physics (March 1958)
Experiments on buoyancy and surface tension following Galileo Galilei
Am. J. Phys. (January 2011)
On motion in a resisting medium: A historical perspective
Am. J. Phys. (February 2016)
Galileo’s discovery of scaling laws
American Journal of Physics (June 2002)