Angular momentum balance is examined in the context of the electrodynamics of a spinning charged sphere, which is allowed to possess any variable angular velocity. We calculate the electric and magnetic fields of the (hollow) sphere, and express them as expansions in powers of τ/tc ≪ 1, the ratio of the light-travel time τ across the sphere and the characteristic time scale tc of variation of the angular velocity. From the fields we compute the self-torque exerted by the fields on the sphere, and argue that only a piece of this self-torque can be associated with radiation reaction. Then we obtain the rate at which angular momentum is radiated away by the shell, and the total angular momentum contained in the electromagnetic field. With these results we demonstrate explicitly that the field angular momentum is lost in part to radiation and in part to the self-torque; angular momentum balance is thereby established. Finally, we examine the angular motion of the sphere under the combined action of the self-torque and an additional torque supplied by an external agent.

1.
D. J.
Griffiths
,
Introduction to Electrodynamics
, 4th ed. (
Pearson
,
Boston
,
2013
).
2.

This variant of Feynman's disk paradox was first proposed by Romer (Ref. 19) and Boos (Ref. 20); the original paradox is discussed in Sec. 17.4 of Volume II of the Feynman lectures (Ref. 21), and in Ref. 22.

3.
J. D.
Jackson
,
Classical Electrodynamics
, 3rd ed. (
Wiley
,
New York
,
1999
).
4.
T. H.
Boyer
, “
Mass renormalization and radiation damping for a charged particle in uniform circular motion
,”
Am. J. Phys.
40
,
1843
1846
(
1972
).
5.
F.
Rohrlich
, “
The dynamics of a charged sphere and the electron
,”
Am. J. Phys.
65
,
1051
1056
(
1997
).
6.
D. J.
Griffiths
,
T. C.
Proctor
, and
D. F.
Schroeter
, “
Abraham–Lorentz versus Landau–Lifshitz
,”
Am. J. Phys.
78
,
391
402
(
2010
).
7.
L. D.
Landau
and
E. M.
Lifshitz
,
The Classical Theory of Fields
, 4th ed. (Butterworth-
Heinemann
,
Oxford, England
,
2000
).
8.
D. J.
Griffiths
and
R. E.
Owen
, “
Mass renormalization in classical electrodynamics
,”
Am. J. Phys.
51
,
1120
1126
(
1983
).
9.
D. J.
Griffiths
and
E. W.
Szeto
, “
Dumbbell model for the classical radiation reaction
,”
Am. J. Phys.
46
,
244
248
(
1978
).
10.
A.
Ori
and
E.
Rosenthal
, “
Universal self force from an extended-object approach
,”
Phys. Rev. D
68
,
041701
(
2003
); e-print arXiv:gr-qc/0205003.
11.
A.
Ori
and
E.
Rosenthal
, “
Calculation of the self force using the extended-object approach
,”
J. Math. Phys.
45
,
2347
2364
(
2004
); e-print arXiv:gr-qc/0309102.
12.
S. E.
Gralla
,
A. I.
Harte
, and
R. M.
Wald
, “
Rigorous derivation of electromagnetic self-force
,”
Phys. Rev. D
80
,
024031
(
2009
); e-print arXiv:0905.2391.
13.

The electromagnetic angular momentum of a spinning shell with constant angular velocity was previously calculated by de Castro (Ref. 23).

14.
D. R.
Stump
and
G. L.
Pollack
, “
Magnetic dipole oscillations and radiation damping
,”
Am. J. Phys.
65
,
81
87
(
1997
).
15.
A.
Ashtekar
and
B.
Bonga
, “
On the ambiguity in the notion of transverse traceless modes of gravitational waves
,”
Gen. Rel. Grav.
49
,
122
(
2017
); e-print arXiv:1707.09914.
16.
R. J.
Cook
, “
Radiation reaction revisited
,”
Am. J. Phys.
52
,
894
895
(
1984
).
17.

The stress tensor is sometimes defined with plus signs, with the alternative convention that TabemdSb is the momentum crossing into the element of surface per unit time.

18.

The reduction of order works even when ε is taken to be of order unity. In this case, the procedure relies entirely on the assumption that τ/tc ≪ 1, and it produces a very similar form for the reduced equation of motion, with coefficients that acquire ε-dependent corrections.

19.
R. H.
Romer
, “
Angular momentum of static electromagnetic fields
,”
Am. J. Phys.
34
,
772
778
(
1966
).
20.
F. L.
Boos
, Jr.
, “
More on the Feynman's disk paradox
,”
Am. J. Phys.
52
,
756
757
(
1984
).
21.
R. P.
Feynman
,
R. B.
Leighton
, and
M.
Sands
,
The Feynman Lectures on Physics
, The New Millennium Edition (
Basic Books
,
USA
,
2011
).
22.
G. G.
Lombardi
, “
Feynman's disk paradox
,”
Am. J. Phys.
51
,
213
214
(
1983
).
23.
A. S.
de Castro
, “
Electromagnetic angular momentum for a rotating charged shell
,”
Am. J. Phys.
59
,
180
181
(
1991
).
AAPT members receive access to the American Journal of Physics and The Physics Teacher as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.