The ray model is usually applied to explain optical phenomena involving light propagation through an optical system and the formation of an image. However, students have difficulties understanding the image formation in some cases because the traditional ray model only represents special light rays. In the present study, we replaced the traditional ray model with the luminous ray model (LRM) to help students understand image formation. In addition, the positive impact of virtual simulation (VS) in the learning process has been documented over the past few decades. The purposes of this study were to investigate high school students' conceptual change in learning image formation through the LRM, and to explore the learning effectiveness of VS on learning different optical concepts. The results indicated that the LRM is helpful in improving students' conceptual understanding. A further analysis showed that VS+LRM was more beneficial than other groups regarding the concept that the object lying on the horizontal central axis could form a real image. These results will help science teachers develop an instructional module to facilitate students' learning of image formation.

1.
S.
Bendall
,
F.
Goldberg
, and
I.
Galili
, “
Prospective elementary teachers' prior knowledge about light
,”
J. Res. Sci. Teach.
30
(
9
),
1169
1187
(
1993
).
2.
H. P.
Chang
,
J. Y.
Chen
,
C. J.
Guo
,
C. C.
Chen
,
C. Y.
Chang
,
S. H.
Lin
, and
C. C.
Chen
, “
Investigating primary and secondary students' learning of physics concepts in Taiwan
,”
Int. J. Sci. Edu.
29
(
4
),
465
482
(
2007
).
3.
I.
Galili
, “
Students' conceptual change in geometrical optics
,”
Int. J. Sci. Edu.
18
(
7
),
847
868
(
1996
).
4.
I.
Galili
,
S.
Bendall
, and
F.
Goldberg
, “
The effects of prior knowledge and instruction on understanding image formation
,”
J. Res. Sci. Teach.
30
(
3
),
271
301
(
1993
).
5.
I.
Galili
and
A.
Hazan
, “
Learners' knowledge in optics: Interpretation, structure and analysis
,”
Int. J. Sci. Edu.
22
(
1
),
57
88
(
2000
).
6.
F. M.
Goldberg
and
L. C.
McDermott
, “
Student difficulties in understanding image formation by a plane mirror
,”
Phys. Teach.
24
(
8
),
472
480
(
1986
).
7.
F. M.
Goldberg
and
L. C.
McDermott
, “
An investigation of student understanding of the real image formed by a converging lens or concave mirror
,”
Am. J. Phys.
55
(
2
),
108
119
(
1987
).
8.
D.
Langley
,
M.
Ronen
, and
B. S.
Eylon
, “
Light propagation and visual patterns: Preinstruction learners' conceptions
,”
J. Res. Sci. Teach.
34
(
4
),
399
424
(
1997
).
9.
B. S.
Eylon
,
M.
Ronen
, and
U.
Ganiel
, “
Computer simulations as tools for teaching and learning: Using a simulation environment in optics
.”
J. Sci. Edu. Technol.
5
(
2
),
93
110
(
1996
).
10.
J. A.
Bryan
and
S. W.
Slough
, “
Converging lens simulation design and image predictions
,”
Phys. Edu.
44
(
3
),
264
275
(
2009
).
11.
M.
Ronen
and
B. S.
Eylon
, “
To see or not to see: the eye in geometrical optics-when and how?
,”
Phys. Edu.
28
(
1
),
52
59
(
1993
).
12.
T.
De Jong
and
M.
Njoo
, “
Learning and instruction with computer simulations: Learning processes involved
,” in
Computer-Based Learning Environments and Problem Solving
(
Springer
,
Berlin, Heidelberg
,
1992
), pp.
411
427
.
13.
N. D.
Finkelstein
,
W. K.
Adams
,
C. J.
Keller
,
P. B.
Kohl
,
K. K.
Perkins
,
N. S.
Podolefsky
, and
R.
LeMaster
, “
When learning about the real world is better done virtually: A study of substituting computer simulations for laboratory equipment
,”
Phys. Rev. Spec. Top.-Phys. Edu. Res.
1
(
1
),
010103
(
2005
).
14.
G.
Olympiou
and
Z.
Zacharias
, “
Making the invisible visible: Enhancing students' conceptual understanding by introducing representations of abstract objects in a simulation
,”
Instruct. Sci.
41
(
3
),
575
596
(
2013
).
15.
P. K.
Tao
, “
Developing understanding of image formation by lenses through collaborative learning mediated by multimedia computer
assisted learning programs
,”
Int. J. Sci. Edu.
26
(
10
),
1171
1197
(
2004
).
16.
Z. C.
Zacharia
, “
Comparing and combining real and virtual experimentation: An effort to enhance students' conceptual understanding of electric circuits
,”
J. Comp. Assisted Learning
23
(
2
),
120
132
(
2007
).
17.
W.
Winn
,
F.
Stahr
,
C.
Sarason
,
R.
Fruland
,
P.
Oppenheimer
, and
Y. L.
Lee
, “
Learning oceanography from a computer simulation compared with direct experience at sea
,”
J. Res. Sci. Teach.
43
(
1
),
25
42
(
2006
).
18.
K. C.
Trundle
and
R. L.
Bell
, “
The use of a computer simulation to promote conceptual change: A quasi-experimental study
,”
Comp. Edu.
54
(
4
),
1078
1088
(
2010
).
19.
L. M.
Triona
and
D.
Klahr
, “
Point and click or grab and heft: Comparing the influence of physical and virtual instructional materials on elementary school students' ability to design experiments
,”
Cogn. Instruct.
21
(
2
),
149
173
(
2003
).
20.
M.
Hegarty
,
S.
Kriz
, and
C.
Cate
, “
The roles of mental animations and external animations in understanding mechanical system
,”
Cogn. Instruct.
21
(
4
),
209
249
(
2003
).
21.
G. J.
Posner
,
K. A.
Strike
,
P. W.
Hewson
, and
W. A.
Gertzog
, “
Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change
,”
Sci. Edu.
66
(
2
),
211
227
(
1982
).
22.
J.
Piaget
,
The Equilibration of Cognitive Structures: The Central Problem of Intellectual Development
(
University of Chicago Press
,
Chicago
,
1985
).
23.
B. C.
Buckley
, “
Interactive multimedia and model-based learning in biology
,”
Int. J. Sci. Edu.
22
(
9
),
895
935
(
2000
).
24.
R. A.
Zwaan
, “
Embodied cognition, perceptual symbols, and situation models
,”
Discourse Processes
28
(
1
),
81
88
(
1999
).
25.
T.
De Jong
and
W. R.
Van Joolingen
, “
Scientific discovery learning with computer simulations of conceptual domains
,”
Rev. Edu. Res.
68
(
2
),
179
201
(
1998
).
AAPT members receive access to the American Journal of Physics and The Physics Teacher as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.