In the Principia, Book 1, Proposition 1, Newton gave a geometrical proof of angular momentum conservation for central forces. A geometrical construction associated with this proof provides a very efficient graphical method to obtain approximate orbital curves for such forces that can be traced with a ruler and a pencil. Newton's geometrical construction also satisfies a discrete form of energy conservation and it is time reversal invariant. An algorithm corresponding to this construction provides an efficient and stable numerical method to integrate the equations of motion of classical mechanics. In the past, this algorithm has been rediscovered several times without recognizing its connection to Newton's geometrical construction.

1.
Isaac
Newton
,
The Principia
, a new translation by I. B. Cohen and Anne Whitman (
University of California Press
,
California
,
1999
).
2.
R. S.
Westfall
,
Never at Rest, A Biography of Isaac Newton
(
Cambridge U.P.
,
Cambridge
,
1980
), p.
470
.
3.
In the Principia the conservation of angular momentum appears as Corollary 1 to Proposition 1, and it is applied in Proposition 41 where the angular momentum label Q is introduced without reference to Proposition 1.
4.
C.
Störmer
, “
Méthode d'integration numérique des équations différentielles ordinaries
,” Compte Rendu du Congres international des mathématiciens tenu a Strasbourg du 22 au 30 September 1920–1921, pp
243
257
.
5.
L.
Verlet
, “
Computer experiments on classical fluids
,”
Phys. Rev.
159
,
98
103
(
1967
).
6.
A.
Cromer
, “
Stable solutions using the Euler approximation
,”
Am. J. Phys.
49
,
455
459
(
1981
).
7.
R. P.
Feynman
,
The Feynman Lectures on Physics
, edited by
R. P.
Feynman
,
R. B.
Leighton
, and
M.
Sands
(
Addison-Wesley
,
Reading, Massachusetts
,
1963
), pp.
9-6
9-9
;
Feynman was familiar with Newton's proof of Kepler's area law in Proposition 1 which he presented during a lecture at Cornell in 1964 on
The Character of Physical Law
(
M.I.T. Press
,
Cambridge
,
1965
), pp.
41
44
.
8.
After the completion of this paper, Yves Pomeau called my attention to a publication by
P.
Coullet
,
M.
Monticelli
, and
J.
Treinert
in Bulletin de l'APMEP Association des Professeurs de Mathmatiques de l'Enseignement Public (APMEP) number 450,
73
85
(
2004
). In their paper, these authors showed the relation between the algebraic form of Newton's Proposition 1 geometrical construction and the calculational algorithm of Stormer, Verlet, and Cromer, and they also obtained a relation for discrete energy conservation similar to that in Eq. (18).
9.

The magnitude of the displacement due to the impulse at B is cC = aδt2, where a is the acceleration due to the central force at B, but in Proposition 1, Newton does not specify the magnitude of cC.

10.

In Proposition 1, Newton appealed to Lemma 3, Corollary 4, indicating that at each step of his geometrical construction the magnitude of the impulses are determined by a given continuous orbital curve.

11.
The Correspondence of Isaac Newton, vol. 2, 1676–1687
, edited by
H. W.
Turnbull
(
Cambridge U.P.
,
Cambridge
,
1960
), p.
433
.
12.
Some renown Newtonian scholars did not realize that Newton's early methods were geometrical and based on graphical procedures. For example,
Alexander
Koyre
remarked that “
the problem (central force motion) he (Newton) deals with is very difficult, and its solution implies mathematical methods that Newton, probably did not posses at the time, perhaps not even later. Much more surprising is the very problem Newton is treating—the problem of a body submitted to a constant centripetal force
,”
Isis
43
,
332
(
1952
).
13.

The radius of curvature of orbital curves is discussed in Proposition 6, and in Lemma 11, Principia, Book 1.

14.
In a 1964 lecture at Cornell University on the character of physical law, Richard Feynman gave a detailed presentation of Newton's geometrical proof in Proposition 1 that central forces lead to conservation of angular momentum.
R.
Feynman
,
The Character of Physical Law
(
MIT Press
,
Cambridge
,
1965
), pp.
41
43
.
15.
Newton's graphical method for constant impulses is illustrated in a video at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5vr8p2l76ts&t=1s.
16.
The idea that accelerated motion consists of discrete changes in velocity during equal time intervals can be traced back to Galileo and to Isaac Beeckman. Galileo stated that “
A motions is said to be uniformly accelerated when starting from rest, it acquires, during equal time intervals, equal increments of speed
” in
Two New Sciences
(
Dover Publication
,
New York
,
1954
), p.
152
.
According to Beeckman, the terrestrial force acting on a falling body is not truly continuous but discrete: “
she pulls with small jerks
.”
Berkel
van Klass
,
Isaac Beeckman on Matter and Motion, Mechanical Philosophy in the Making
(
John Hopkins U.P.
,
Maryland
,
2013
), p.
113
.
17.

As a student at Trinity College, Cambridge University, Newton became familiar with Frans van Schooten's Latin edition of Descartes Geometrie that describes geometry in an algebraic form. He neglected to study Euclidian geometry which he regarded as trivial, until Isaac Barrow, during an examination, emphasized to him its importance.

18.
N.
Guicciardini
,
Isaac Newton on Mathematical Certainty and Method
(
M.I.T. Press
,
Cambridge
,
2000
), pp.
177
1779
.
19.
With the interpretation that the impulse lines in Newton's geometrical construction end on an given curve,
B.
Pourciau
claims that Newton made “
one serious (meaning fundamental and irreparable) error, assuming that his polygonal approximation argument for Proposition 1 establishes the Fixed Plane Property for centripetal motions
,”
The Cambridge Companion to Newton
, edited by
Rob
Iliffe
and
George
Smith
, 2nd ed. (
Cambridge U.P.
,
Cambridge
,
2016
), pp.
93
186
. Actually, in a Scholium to Proposition 2 Newton remark that “
if some force acts continually along a line perpendicular to the surface described it will cause the body to deviate from the plane of its motion
.” establishing that for central forces the orbits are confined to a plane.
20.

In 1685 Newton sent to the Royal Society an early draft of the Principia entitled De Motu Corporum Gyratum.

21.
M.
Nauenberg
, “
Hooke, orbital motion and Newton's Principia
,”
Am. J. Phys.
62
,
331
350
(
1994
).
22.
M.
Nauenberg
, “
Hooke's and Newton's contributions to the early development of orbital dynamics and the theory of universal gravitation
,”
Early Sci. Med.
10
,
518
528
(
2005
).
23.
Among Hooke's papers in the Trinity Library, Cambridge, there is a manuscript dated Sept. 85 that contains Hooke's drawing of an elliptical orbit.
24.
M.
Nauenberg
, “
Newton's early computational method for dynamics
,”
Arch. Hist. Exact Sci. bf
46
,
221
252
(
1994
);
I. B.
Cohem
, “
Newton's curvature measure of force
,” in
A Guide to Newton's Principia
(
University of California Press
,
California
,
1999
), Section 3.9, pp.
78
82
;
Curvature in Newton's dynamics
” (with J. Brackenridge),
The Cambridge Companion to Newton
, edited by
I. B.
Cohen
and
G.
Smith
(
Cambridge U.P.
,
Cambridge
,
2002
), pp.
85
187
;
M.
Nauenberg
, “
Curvature in orbital dynamics
,”
Am. J. Phys.
73
,
340
368
(
2005
).
25.
Reference 20, p.
336
.
26.
A video of my re-enactment of Hooke's experiment of a ball rolling in an inverted cone is shown at <https://vimeo.com/83533367>
27.
Reference 11, p.
444
.
28.
All the manuscripts of Newton that have been preserved have been made available by the Cambridge Digital Library at <https://cudl.lib.cam.ac.uk/collections/newton/1>
29.
I. B.
Cohen
,
Introduction to Newton's Principia
(
Cambridge U.P.
,
Cambridge
,
1971
), p.
89
.
AAPT members receive access to the American Journal of Physics and The Physics Teacher as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.