The use of lab notebooks for scientific documentation is a ubiquitous part of physics research. However, it is common for undergraduate physics laboratory courses not to emphasize the development of documentation skills, despite the fact that such courses are some of the earliest opportunities for students to start engaging in this practice. One potential impediment to the inclusion of explicit documentation training is that it may be unclear to instructors which features of authentic documentation practice are efficacious to teach and how to incorporate these features into the lab class environment. In this work, we outline some of the salient features of authentic documentation, informed by interviews with physics researchers, and provide recommendations for how these can be incorporated into the lab curriculum. We do not focus on structural details or templates for notebooks. Instead, we address holistic considerations for the purpose of scientific documentation that can guide students to develop their own documentation style. While taking into consideration all the aspects that can help improve students' documentation, it is also important to consider the design of the lab activities themselves. Students should have experience with implementing these authentic features of documentation during lab activities in order for them to find practice with documentation beneficial.

1.
American Association of Physics Teachers,
AAPT recommendations for the undergraduate physics laboratory curriculum
, AAPT Resources, Report (2014), pp.
1
29
.
2.
President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology
,
Engage to Excel: Producing One Million Additional College Graduates with Degrees in STEM
(
PCAST
,
Washington, DC
,
2012
).
3.
Advisory Committee to the National Science Foundation Directorate for Education and Human Resources
,
Shaping the Future: New Expectations for Undergraduate Education in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology
(
NSF
,
Arlington, VA
,
1996
).
4.
Cary
Moskovitz
and
David
Kellogg
, “
Inquiry-based writing in the laboratory course
,”
Science
332
,
919
921
(
2011
).
5.
Leonora
Jackson
,
Wilhelm
Meyer
, and
Jean
Parkinson
, “
A study of the writing tasks and reading assigned to undergraduate science students at a South African University
,”
Engl. Specific Purp.
25
,
260
281
(
2006
).
6.
Neal
Lerner
, “
Laboratory Lessons for Writing and Science
,”
Written Commun.
24
(
3
),
191
222
(
2007
).
7.
Peter J.
Alaimo
,
John C.
Bean
,
Joseph M.
Langenhan
, and
Larry
Nichols
, “
Eliminating lab reports: A rhetorical approach for teaching the scientific paper in sophomore organic chemistry
,”
WAC J.
20
,
17
32
(
2009
), available at https://wac.colostate.edu/journal/vol20/alaimo.pdf.
8.
Julie A.
Reynolds
,
Christopher
Thaiss
,
Wendy
Katkin
, and
Robert J.
Thompson
, “
Writing-to-learn in undergraduate science education: A community-based, conceptually driven approach
,”
CBE Life Sci. Educ.
11
,
17
25
(
2012
).
9.
Nancy
Ruzycki
, “
Writing, speaking and communicating—Building disciplinary literacy in materials science undergraduate students
,” in
ASEE Annual Conference, Seattle, WA, 2015
, pp.
1
12
.
10.
W. G.
Bowers
, “
Notebooks in laboratory instruction
,”
J. Chem. Educ.
3
,
419
424
(
1926
).
11.
H. W.
Gould
, “
How grade laboratory notebooks?
J. Chem. Educ.
4
,
890
891
(
1927
).
12.
J. C.
Mortensen
, “
How, when, and where grade laboratory notebooks?
J. Chem. Educ.
4
,
892
893
(
1927
).
13.
Howard K.
Karare
,
Writing the Laboratory Notebook
(
American Chemical Society
,
Washington, DC
,
1985
), available at https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED344734.
14.
Bradford D.
Pendley
, “
Keeping a scientific notebook: The Lego exercise
,”
J. Chem. Educ.
74
,
1065
(
1997
).
15.
Roy V.
Hughson
, “
The right way to keep laboratory notebooks
,”
IEEE Trans. Prof. Commun.
PC-22
,
83
85
(
1979
).
16.
John B.
McCormack
,
Robert K.
Morrow
,
Harold F.
Bare
,
Robert J.
Burns
, and
James L.
Rasmussen
, “
The complementary roles of laboratory notebooks and laboratory reports
,”
IEEE Trans. Educ.
34
,
133
137
(
1991
).
17.
Malcom M.
Renfrew
, “
Review: Writing the laboratory notebook
,”
J. Chem. Educ.
66
,
A74
(
1989
).
18.
Anne-marie
Hoskinson
,
Brian A
Couch
, and
Benjamin M
Zwickl
, “
Bridging physics and biology teaching through modeling
,”
Am. J. Phys.
82
,
434
441
(
2014
).
19.
John L.
McKnight
, “
Laboratory notebooks of G. S. Ohm: A case study in experimental method
,”
Am. J. Phys.
35
,
110
114
(
1967
).
20.
Irving E.
Dayton
, “
Toward a more effective introductory laboratory
,”
Am. J. Phys.
30
,
218
220
(
1962
).
21.
M. G.
Miller
, “
Intermediate physics laboratory at Clemson
,”
Am. J. Phys.
33
,
296
297
(
1965
).
22.
Hans G.
Graetzer
, “
Cumulative experiments in the advanced laboratory
,”
Am. J. Phys.
40
,
270
276
(
1972
).
23.
Leslie J.
Atkins
and
Irene Y.
Salter
, “
Using scientists' notebooks to foster authentic scientific practices
,”
AIP Conf. Proc.
1513
,
50
53
(
2013
).
24.
Irene
Salter
and
Leslie
Atkins
, “
Student-generated scientific inquiry for elementary education undergraduates: Course development, outcomes and implications
,”
J. Sci. Teach. Educ.
24
,
157
177
(
2013
).
25.
Jacob T.
Stanley
and
H. J.
Lewandowski
, “
Lab notebooks as scientific communication: Investigating development from undergraduate courses to graduate research
,”
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res.
12
,
020129-1
11
(
2016
).
AAPT members receive access to the American Journal of Physics and The Physics Teacher as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.