In this article, we give both qualitative and quantitative explanations of why a train stays on its track, in spite of perturbations that could cause it to derail. We show that train stability originates from the conical shape of the wheels, which gives rise to a restoring normal force in response to a lateral disturbance. We first demonstrate translational stabilization in a simple situation where the rails are assumed frictionless and the steering motion of the wheel is neglected. We then develop a more comprehensive model, taking friction and steering into account. We show that rolling friction couples the rotational motion to the translational motion, enhancing overall stability. Finally, we find approximate formulae for the parameters governing stability, and show good agreement with parameters of a real railway coach.
Skip Nav Destination
Why trains stay on tracks
Article navigation
March 2017
PAPERS|
March 01 2017
Why trains stay on tracks
B. Shayak
B. Shayak
Department of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, Sibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering,
Cornell University
, Ithaca, New York 14853
Search for other works by this author on:
Am. J. Phys. 85, 178–184 (2017)
Article history
Received:
February 23 2016
Accepted:
December 07 2016
Citation
B. Shayak; Why trains stay on tracks. Am. J. Phys. 1 March 2017; 85 (3): 178–184. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.4973370
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your InstitutionPay-Per-View Access
$40.00