We use simple symmetry arguments suitable for undergraduate students to demonstrate that the magnetic energy, forces, and torques between two uniformly magnetized spheres are identical to those between two point magnetic dipoles. These arguments exploit the equivalence of the field outside of a uniformly magnetized sphere with that of a point magnetic dipole, and pertain to spheres of arbitrary sizes, positions, and magnetizations. The point dipole/sphere equivalence for magnetic interactions may be useful in teaching and research, where dipolar approximations for uniformly magnetized spheres can now be considered to be exact. The work was originally motivated by interest in the interactions between collections of small neodymium magnetic spheres used as desk toys.
References
1.
J. D.
Jackson
, Classical Electrodynamics
, 2nd ed. (Wiley
, New York
, 1975
), Sec. 5.6, pp. 180
–184
.2.
G.
Akoun
and J.
Yonnet
, “3D analytical calculation of the forces exerted between two cuboidal magnets
,” IEEE Trans. Magn.
20
, 1962
–1964
(1984
).3.
A.
Kruusing
, “Optimizing magnetization orientation of permanent magnets for maximal gradient force
,” J. Magn. Magn. Mater.
234
, 545
–555
(2001
).4.
D.
Vokoun
, M.
Beleggia
, L.
Heller
, and P.
Sittner
, “Magnetostatic interactions and forces between cylindrical permanent magnets
,” J. Magn. Magn. Mater.
321
, 3758
–3763
(2009
).5.
J. S.
Agashe
and D. P.
Arnold
, “A study of scaling and geometry effects on the forces between cuboidal and cylindrical magnets using analytical force solutions
,” J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys.
41
, 105001
(2008
);J. S.
Agashe
and D. P.
Arnold
, “Corrigendum: A study of scaling and geometry effects on the forces between cuboidal and cylindrical magnets using analytical force solutions
,” J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys.
42
, 099801
(2009
).6.
S.
Sanz
, L.
Garcia-Tabares
, I.
Moya
, D.
Obradors
, and F.
Toral
, “Evaluation of magnetic forces in permanent magnets
,” IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond.
20
, 846
–850
(2010
).7.
M.
Beleggia
, S.
Tandon
, Y.
Zhi
, and M.
De Graef
, “On the magnetostatic interactions between nanoparticles of arbitrary shape
,” J. Magn. Magn. Mater.
278
, 270
–284
(2004
).8.
9.
10.
M.
Varón
, M.
Beleggia
, T.
Kasama
, R. J.
Harrison
, R. E.
Dunin-Borkowski
, V. F.
Puntes
, and C.
Frandsen
, “Dipolar magnetism in ordered and disordered low-dimensional nanoparticle assemblies
,” Sci. Rep.
3
, 1
–5
(2013
).11.
G.
Helgesen
, T. T.
Skjeltorp
, P. M.
Mors
, R.
Botet
, and R.
Jullien
, “Aggregation of magnetic microspheres: Experiments and simulations
,” Phys. Rev. Lett.
61
(15
), 1736
–1739
(1988
).12.
D. A.
Richter
, “Expert report, Teaching geometry with magnet sphere kits, in the matter of Zen Magnets, LLC, CPSC Docket No. 12-2
,” Item 124, Exhibit 3, 2014 <http://www.cpsc.gov/en/Recalls/Recall-Lawsuits/Adjudicative-Proceedings/> (accessed 9 February, 2016).13.
B. F.
Edwards
, “Expert report: Educational value of neodymium magnet spheres in the matter of Zen Magnets, LLC, CPSC Docket No. 12-2
,” Item 124, Exhibit 4, 2014, <http://www.cpsc.gov/en/Recalls/Recall-Lawsuits/Adjudicative-Proceedings/> (accessed February 9, 2016).14.
The Zen Gallery, curated by Shihan Qu, shows photos of various magnetic sculptures including models of fractals, molecules, lattices, and Platonic solids <http://zenmag nets.com/gallery/> (accessed February 9, 2016).
15.
Typing “Zen Magnets” into the YouTube search field at <https://www.youtube.com> identifies over 90,000 videos describing various magnet structures (accessed March 23, 2016). As of August 22, 2014, the most popular of these had a total view count exceeding 145 × 106 (Ref. 13, Appendix D).
16.
On November 22, 2016, the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit ended a two-year sales ban by the United States Consumer Product Safety Commission on sets of small high-powered magnets, ruling that the factual findings on which the ban was based were incomplete and inadequately explained <https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bw7DdocNZGQgbWlON2loT2FfQzA/view>. Magnet sets marketed as desk toys may now be purchased in the United States from suppliers including (<http://www.zenmagnets.com>, <http://www.buckyballsstore.com>, and <http://www.neoballs.com>, and may also be purchased from industrial suppliers including <http://www.kjmagnetics.com>, <http://www.alibaba.com>, and <http://www.magnet4less.com> (accessed December 29, 2016).
17.
B. F.
Edwards
and John M.
Edwards
, “Dynamical interactions between two uniformly magnetized spheres
,” Eur. J. Phys.
38
, 015205
(2017
).18.
J. M.
Edwards
, MagPhyx Simulation and Visualization Software, <http://www2.cose.isu.edu/edwajohn/MagPhyx> (accessed March 11, 2016). This web-based software simulates the 2D motion of a uniformly magnetized sphere in response to the forces and torques supplied by a second uniformly magnetized sphere, held fixed. It is provided freely to the physics community for education and exploration.19.
M.
Beleggia
and M.
De Graef
, “General magnetostatic shape-shape interactions
,” J. Magn. Magn. Mater.
285
, L1
–L10
(2005
).20.
D.
Vokoun
and M.
Beleggia
, “Forces between arrays of permanent magnets of basic geometric shapes
,” J. Magn. Magn. Mater.
350
, 174
–178
(2014
). This publication quotes the result of an unpublished calculation of the magnetic interaction between two identical spheres with parallel magnetizations. Details of this calculation were sent privately to us by D. Vokoun on February 8, 2016.21.
W.
Booth
and B.
Edwards
(unpublished).22.
D.
Griffiths
, Introduction to Electrodynamics
, 3rd ed. (Pearson Education
, Upper Saddle River
, 1999
), p. 282
.23.
K. W.
Young
, P. B.
Landecker
, and D. D.
Villani
, “An analytic solution for the force between two magnetic dipoles
,” Magn. Electr. Sep.
9
, 39
–52
(1998
).24.
T. H.
Boyer
, “The force on a magnetic dipole
,” Am. J. Phys.
56
, 688
–692
(1988
).25.
K. R.
Brownstein
, “Force exerted on a magnetic dipole
,” Am. J. Phys.
61
, 940
–941
(1993
).26.
J. B.
Greene
and F. G.
Karioris
, “Force on a magnetic dipole
,” Am. J. Phys.
39
, 172
–175
(1971
).27.
L.
Vaidman
, “Torque and force on a magnetic dipole
,” Am. J. Phys.
58
, 978
–983
(1990
).28.
R. P.
Feynman
, R. B.
Leighton
, and M.
Sands
, The Feynman Lectures on Physics
(Addison-Wesley
, Boston, MA
, 1964
), Vol. II
, pp. 26
–25
. Here, Feynman discusses the example of the non-central force between two positively charged particles, one moving in the +x direction and the other moving in the +y direction. At the instant that particle 1 is at the coordinate origin and particle 2 is on the +y axis, the electric forces are central and repulsive, but particle 1 exerts a non-central magnetic force on particle 2 in the +x direction, while particle 2 exerts no magnetic force on particle 1. Thus, Newton's third law does not apply, raising a paradox about the origin of the extra mechanical momentum.29.
A.
Caprez
and H.
Batelaan
, “Feynman's relativistic electrodynamics paradox and the Aharonov-Bohm effect
,” Found. Phys.
39
, 295
–306
(2009
). Here, the authors show that the extra mechanical momentum of Feynman's paradox is hidden in the electromagnetic fields.30.
J. B.
Marion
and S. T.
Thornton
, Classical Dynamics of Particles and Systems
, 4th ed. (Saunders College Publishing
, Fort Worth, TX
, 1995
), p. 50
.31.
Reference 22, p.
246
.32.
D. J.
Griffiths
, “Dipoles at rest
,” Am. J. Phys.
60
, 979
–987
(1992
).33.
We ignore the torque on a sphere due to the electric dipole moment that it acquires from its motion. Point magnetic dipoles in uniform motion through a uniform magnetic field acquire an electric dipole moment that interacts with the magnetic field to give an additional torque on the dipole. This torque is proportional to v2/c2, we ignore it for our non-relativistic investigations. See
David J.
Griffiths
and V.
Hnizdo
, “The torque on a dipole in uniform motion
,” Am. J. Phys.
82
, 251
–254
(2014
).34.
D. J.
Griffiths
and V.
Hnizdo
, “Mansuripur's paradox
,” Am. J. Phys.
81
, 570
–574
(2013
).35.
V.
Hnizdo
, “Hidden mechanical momentum and the field momentum in stationary electromagnetic and gravitational systems
,” Am. J. Phys.
65
, 515
–518
(1997
).36.
T. H.
Boyer
, “Classical interaction of a magnet and a point charge: The Shockley-James paradox
,” Phys. Rev. E
91
, 013201
(2015
).37.
38.
Coercivity, Wikipedia
, <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coercivity> (accessed February 16, 2016).39.
B. Y.
Hu
, “Averages of static electric and magnetic fields over a spherical region: A derivation based on the mean-value theorem
,” Am. J. Phys.
68
, 1058
–1060
(2000
).40.
J.
Vanderlinde
, Classical Electromagnetic Theory
, 1st ed. (Wiley
, New York
, 1993
), pp. 81
–84
.41.
© 2017 American Association of Physics Teachers.
2017
American Association of Physics Teachers
AAPT members receive access to the American Journal of Physics and The Physics Teacher as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.