One way to foster a supportive culture in physics departments is for instructors to provide students with personal attention regarding their academic difficulties. To this end, we have developed the Guided Reflection Form (GRF), an online tool that facilitates student reflections and personalized instructor responses. In the present work, we report on the experiences and practices of two instructors who used the GRF in an introductory physics lab course. Our analysis draws on two sources of data: (i) post-semester interviews with both instructors and (ii) the instructors' written responses to 134 student reflections. Interviews focused on the instructors' perceptions about the goals and framing of the GRF activity, and characteristics of good or bad feedback. Their GRF responses were analyzed for the presence of up to six types of statement: encouraging statements, normalizing statements, empathizing statements, strategy suggestions, resource suggestions, and feedback to the student on the structure of students' reflections. We find that both instructors used all six response types, in alignment with their perceptions of what counts as good feedback. In addition, although each instructor had their own unique feedback style, both instructors' feedback practices were compatible with two principles for effective feedback: praise should focus on effort, express confidence in students' abilities, and be sincere; and process-level feedback should be specific and strategy-oriented. This exploratory qualitative investigation demonstrates that the GRF can serve as a mechanism for instructors to pay personal attention to their students. In addition, it opens the door to future work about the impact of the GRF on student-teacher interactions.

1.
K.
Ward
and
G.
Duda
, “
The role of student reflection in project-based learning physics courses
,” in
Proceedings of the 2014 Physics Education Research Conference
, Minneapolis, MN,
2014
.
2.
Andrew
Mason
and
Chandralekha
Singh
, “
Using reflection with peers to help students learn effective problem solving strategies
,”
AIP Conf. Proc.
1289
,
41
44
(
2010
).
3.
Eugenia
Etkina
,
Anna
Karelina
,
Maria
Ruibal-Villasenor
,
David
Rosengrant
,
Rebecca
Jordan
, and
Cindy E.
Hmelo-Silver
, “
Design and reflection help students develop scientific abilities: Learning in introductory physics laboratories
,”
J. Learn. Sci.
19
,
54
98
(
2010
).
4.
Michael L.
Scott
,
Tim
Stelzer
, and
Gary
Gladding
, “
Explicit reflection in an introductory physics course
,”
AIP Conf. Proc.
951
,
188
191
(
2007
).
5.
David B.
May
and
Eugenia
Etkina
, “
College physics students' epistemological self-reflection and its relationship to conceptual learning
,”
Am. J. Phys.
70
,
1249
1258
(
2002
).
6.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering: Medicine
, “
Promising practices and ongoing challenges
,” in
Integrating Discovery-Based Research into the Undergraduate Curriculum: Report of a Convocation
(
National Academies Press
,
Washington, DC
,
2015
), Chap. 3.
7.
Barry J.
Zimmerman
, “
Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview
,”
Theory Pract.
41
,
64
70
(
2002
).
8.
Daniel L.
Reinholz
and
Dimitri R.
Dounas-Frazer
, “
Using peer feedback to promote reflection on open-ended problems
,”
Phys. Teach.
54
,
364
368
(
2016
).
9.
Punit R.
Gandhi
,
Jesse A.
Livezey
,
Anna M.
Zaniewski
,
Daniel L.
Reinholz
, and
Dimitri R.
Dounas-Frazer
, “
Attending to experimental physics practices and lifelong learning skills in an introductory laboratory course
,”
Am. J. Phys.
84
,
696
703
(
2016
).
10.
Dimitri R.
Dounas-Frazer
and
Daniel L.
Reinholz
, “
Attending to lifelong learning skills through guided reflection in a physics class
,”
Am. J. Phys.
83
,
881
891
(
2015
).
11.
Elaine
Seymour
and
Nancy M.
Hewitt
,
Talking About Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave the Sciences
(
Westview Press
,
Boulder, CO
,
1997
).
12.
Brené
Brown
,
Daring Greatly: How the Courage to be Vulnerable Transforms the Way We Live, Love, Parent, and Lead
(
Penguin
,
New York
,
2012
).
13.
V. J.
Shute
, “
Focus on formative feedback
,”
Rev. Educ. Res.
78
,
153
189
(
2008
).
14.
John
Hattie
and
Helen
Timperley
, “
The power of feedback
,”
Rev. Educ. Res.
77
,
81
112
(
2007
).
15.
Aneeta
Rattan
,
Catherine
Good
, and
Carol S.
Dweck
, “
‘It's ok—Not everyone can be good at math’: Instructors with an entity theory comfort (and demotivate) students
,”
J. Exp. Social Psychol.
48
,
731
737
(
2012
).
16.
Carol S.
Dweck
,
Mindset: The New Psychology of Success
(
Random House
,
New York
,
2006
).
17.
Albert
Bandura
, “
Sources of self-efficacy
,” in
Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control
(
W. H. Freeman
,
New York
,
1997
), pp.
79
115
.
18.
Susan M.
Brookhart
, “
Feedback: An overview
,” in
How to Give Effective Feedback to Your Students
(
ASCD
,
Alexandria, VA
,
2008
), pp.
1
30
.
19.
Margaret
Eisenhart
, “
Generalization from qualitative inquiry
,” in
Generalizing from Educational Research: Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Polarization
, edited by
K.
Ercikan
and
W.-M.
Roth
(
New York
,
NY
,
2009
).
20.
The Access Network
,” <http://accessnetwork.org>.
21.
Badr F.
Albanna
,
Joel C.
Corbo
,
Dimitri R.
Dounas-Frazer
,
Angela
Little
, and
Anna M.
Zaniewski
, “
Building classroom and organizational structure around positive cultural values
,”
AIP Conf. Proc.
1513
,
7
10
(
2013
).
22.
Mel S.
Sabella
,
Kristy
Mardis
,
Angie
Little
, and
Nicolette
Sanders
, “
The Chi-Sci scholars program: Developing community and challenging racially inequitable measures of success at a minority serving institution on Chicago's southside
,”
Phys. Teach.
55
,
350
355
(
2017
).
23.
D. R.
Dounas-Frazer
,
J.
Lynn
,
A. M.
Zaniewski
, and
N.
Roth
, “
Learning about non-Newtonian fluids in a student-driven classroom
,”
Phys. Teach.
51
,
32
34
(
2013
).
24.
Dimitri R.
Dounas-Frazer
,
Simone A.
Hyater-Adams
, and
Daniel L.
Reinholz
, “
Learning to do diversity work: A model for continued education of program organizers
,”
Phys. Teach.
55
,
342
346
(
2017
).
25.
Anna M.
Zaniewski
and
Daniel
Reinholz
, “
Increasing STEM success: a near-peer mentoring program in the physical sciences
,”
Int. J. STEM Educ.
3
,
14
(
2016
).
26.
See supplementary material at http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.5002683 for the GRF Guidelines.

Supplementary Material

AAPT members receive access to the American Journal of Physics and The Physics Teacher as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.