We have designed an introductory laboratory course that engaged first-year undergraduate students in two complementary types of iteration: (1) iterative improvement of experiments through cycles of modeling systems, designing experiments, analyzing data, and refining models and designs; and (2) iterative improvement of self through cycles of reflecting on progress, soliciting feedback, and implementing changes to study habits and habits of mind. The course consisted of three major activities: a thermal expansion activity, which spanned the first half of the semester; final research projects, which spanned the second half of the semester; and guided student reflections, which took place throughout the duration of the course. We describe our curricular designs and report examples of student work that demonstrate students' iterative improvements in multiple contexts.

1.
E.
Brewe
, “
Modeling theory applied: Modeling instruction in introductory physics
,”
Am. J. Phys.
76
,
1155
1160
(
2008
).
2.
E.
Etkina
and
A.
van Heuvelen
, “
Investigative Science Learning Environment—A Science Process Approach to Learning Physics
,” in Research-Based Reform of University Physics, edited by
E. F.
Redish
and
P. J.
Cooney
(
AAPT, College Park
,
MD
,
2007
), Reviews in PER Vol. 1, available online at <http://www.per-central.org/document/ServeFile.cfm?ID=4988>.
3.
B. M.
Zwickl
,
N.
Finkelstein
, and
H. J.
Lewandowski
, “
Incorporating learning goals about modeling into an upper-division physics laboratory experiment
,”
Am. J. Phys.
82
,
876
882
(
2014
).
4.
B. M.
Zwickl
,
N.
Finkelstein
, and
H. J.
Lewandowski
, “
The process of transforming an advanced lab course: Goals, curriculum, and assessments
,”
Am. J. Phys.
81
,
63
70
(
2013
).
5.
AAPT Committee on Laboratories
, “
AAPT Recommendations for the Undergraduate Physics Laboratory Curriculum
,”
Phys. Teach.
53
,
253
253
(
2015
).
6.
C.
Wieman
, “
Comparative cognitive task analyses of experimental science and instructional laboratory courses
,”
Phys. Teach.
53
,
349
351
(
2015
).
7.
NGSS Lead States
,
Next Generation Science Standards: For States, By States
(
National Academies Press
,
Washington, D.C.
,
2013
).
8.
M. J.
Reid
and
J. L.
Moore
, “
College readiness and academic preparation for postsecondary education: Oral histories of first-generation urban college students
,”
Urban Educ.
43
,
240
261
(
2008
).
9.
D. R.
Dounas-Frazer
and
D. L.
Reinholz
, “
Attending to lifelong learning skills through guided reflection in a physics class
,”
Am. J. Phys.
83
,
881
891
(
2015
).
10.
L. Z.
Jaber
, “
Affective dynamics of students' disciplinary engagement in science
,” Ph.D. thesis,
Tufts University
,
2014
.
11.
Committee on Undergraduate Physics Education Research, Implementation, Board on Physics, Astronomy, and Division on Engineering, and National Research Council
,
Adapting to a Changing World–Challenges and Opportunities in Undergraduate Physics Education
(
The National Academies Press
,
Washington, D.C.
,
2013
).
12.
National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering and Institute of Medicine Committee on Underrepresented Groups and the Expansion of the Science and Engineering Workforce Pipeline
,
Expanding Underrepresented Minority Participation
(
National Academies Press
,
Washington, D.C.
,
2011
), Chap. 6.
13.
M. R.
Clark
, “
Negotiating the freshman year: Challenges and strategies among first-year college students
,”
J. Coll. Stud. Dev.
46
,
296
316
(
2005
).
14.
B. M.
Zwickl
,
D.
Hu
,
N.
Finkelstein
, and
H. J.
Lewandowski
, “
Model-based reasoning in the physics laboratory: Framework and initial results
,”
Phys. Rev. Spec. Top. Phys. Educ. Res.
11
,
020113
(
2015
).
15.
D. R.
Dounas-Frazer
,
K. L.
Van De Bogart
,
M. R.
Stetzer
, and
H. J.
Lewandowski
, “
The role of modeling in troubleshooting: An example from electronics
,” in
Physics Education Research Conference 2015, PER Conference
,
Minneapolis, MN
(
2015
).
16.
E.
Etkina
,
A.
Karelina
, and
M.
Ruibal-Villasenor
, “
How long does it take? a study of student acquisition of scientific abilities
,”
Phys. Rev. Spec. Top. Phys. Educ. Res.
4
,
020108
(
2008
).
17.
E.
Etkina
,
A.
Karelina
,
S.
Murthy
, and
M.
Ruibal-Villasenor
, “
Using action research to improve learning and formative assessment to conduct research
,”
Phys. Rev. Spec. Top. Phys. Educ. Res.
5
,
010109
(
2009
).
18.
P. W.
Jackson
,
Life in Classrooms
. (
Holt, Rinehart and Winston
,
New York
,
1968
).
19.

One of the authors (DRDF) co-designed and co-taught the initial iteration of Intro to Measurement in the spring semester of 2012, and two of the authors (PRG and JAL) refined and co-taught the course the following spring. We report on the implementation and pilot study of the second iteration of the course.

20.
B. F.
Albanna
,
J. C.
Corbo
,
D. R.
Dounas-Frazer
,
A.
Little
, and
A. M.
Zaniewski
, “
Building classroom and organizational structure around positive cultural values
,”
AIP Conf. Proc.
1513
,
7
10
(
2013
).
21.
D. R.
Dounas-Frazer
,
J.
Lynn
,
A. M.
Zaniewski
, and
N.
Roth
, “
Learning about non-Newtonian fluids in a student-driven classroom
,”
Phys. Teach.
51
,
32
34
(
2013
).
22.
American Institute of Physics
, “Physics bachelor's degrees: Results from the 2010 survey of enrollments and degrees,” Focus On (2015).
23.

Consent was obtained pursuant to protocol No. 2012-11-4836, approved by the UC Berkeley Committee for Protection of Human Subjects.

24.
Working for Equity in Heterogeneous Classrooms: Sociological Theory in Practice
,
E. G.
Cohen
and
R. A.
Lotan
(
Teachers College Press
,
New York
,
1997
).
25.
S.
Papert
and
I.
Hardel
,
Constructionism
(
Ablex Publishing
,
New York
,
1991
).
26.
G.
Planinsic
, “
Project laboratory for first-year students
,”
Eur. J. Phys.
28
,
S71
S82
(
2007
).
27.
D. R.
Dounas-Frazer
,
P. R.
Gandhi
, and
G. Z.
Iwata
, “
Uncertainty analysis for a simple thermal expansion experiment
,”
Am. J. Phys.
81
,
338
342
(
2013
).
28.
A.
Mason
and
C.
Singh
, “
Using reflection with peers to help students learn effective problem solving strategies
,”
AIP Conf. Proc.
1289
,
41
44
(
2010
).
29.
M. L.
Scott
,
T.
Stelzer
, and
G.
Gladding
, “
Explicit reflection in an introductory physics course
,”
AIP Conf. Proc.
951
,
188
191
(
2007
).
30.
D. B.
May
and
E.
Etkina
, “
College physics students epistemological self-reflection and its relationship to conceptual learning
,”
Am. J. Phys.
70
,
1249
1258
(
2002
).
31.
K.
Ward
and
G.
Duda
, “
The role of student reflection in project-based learning physics courses
,” in
Proceedings of the 2014 Physics Education Research Conference
,
Minneapolis, MN
(
2014
).
32.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
,
Integrating Discovery-Based Research into the Undergraduate Curriculum: Report of a Convocation
(
National Academies Press
,
Washington, D.C.
,
2015
), Chap. 3, Promising Practices and Ongoing Challenges.
33.
B. J.
Zimmerman
, “
Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview
,”
Theory Pract.
41
,
64
70
(
2002
).
34.
See supplementary material at http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.4955147 for the complete self-evaluation rubric.
35.
J.
Hattie
and
H.
Timperley
, “
The power of feedback
,”
Rev. Educ. Res.
77
,
81
112
(
2007
).
36.
E.
Seymour
and
N. M.
Hewitt
,
Talking about leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave the Sciences
(
Westview Press
,
Boulder, CO
,
1997
).

Supplementary Material

AAPT members receive access to the American Journal of Physics and The Physics Teacher as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.