We present an apparent paradox within the special theory of relativity, involving a trolley with relativistic velocity and its rolling wheels. Two solutions are given, both making clear the physical reality of the Lorentz contraction, and that the distance on the rails between each time a specific point on the rim touches the rail is not equal to 2πR, where R is the radius of the wheel, but 2πR/1R2Ω2/c2, where Ω is the angular velocity of the wheels. In one solution, the wheel radius is constant as the velocity of the trolley increases, and in the other the wheels contract in the radial direction. We also explain two surprising facts. First that the shape of a rolling wheel is elliptical in spite of the fact that the upper part of the wheel moves faster than the lower part, and thus is more Lorentz contracted, and second that a Lorentz contracted wheel with relativistic velocity rolls out a larger distance between two successive touches of a point of the wheel on the rails than the length of a circle with the same radius as the wheels.

1.
Ø.
Grøn
,
Space Geometry in Rotating Reference Frames: A Historical Appraisal, in Relativity in Rotating Frames. Fundamental Theories of Physics
, edited by
G.
Rizzi
and
M.
Ruggiero
(
Springer
,
New Yok
,
2003
), Vol.
135
, pp.
285
333
.
2.
W.
Rindler
, “
Length contraction paradox
,”
Am. J. Phys.
29
,
365
366
(
1961
).
3.
R. De A.
Martins
, “
Length paradox in relativity
,”
Am. J. Phys.
46
,
667
670
(
1978
).
4.
G. P.
Sastry
, “
Is length contraction really paradoxical?
,”
Am. J. Phys.
55
,
943
946
(
1987
).
5.
Ø.
Grøn
and
S.
Johannesen
, “
Computer simulation of Rindler's length contraction paradox
,”
Eur. J. Phys.
14
,
97
100
(
1993
).
6.
H.
van Lintel
and
C.
Gruber
, “
The rod and the hole paradox re-examined
,”
Eur. J. Phys.
26
,
19
23
(
2005
).
7.
C.
Iyer
and
G. M.
Prabhu
, “
Reversal in the time order of interactive events: the collision of inclined rods
,”
Eur. J. Phys.
27
,
819
824
(
2006
).
8.
C.
Iyer
and
G. M.
Prabhu
, “
Differing observations on the landing of the rod into the slot
,”
Am. J. Phys.
74
,
998
1001
(
2006
).
9.
E.
Pierce
, “
The lock and key paradox and the limits of rigidity in special relativity
,”
Am. J. Phys.
75
,
610
614
(
2007
).
10.
G.
Rizzi
and
M. L.
Ruggiero
, “
Space geometry of rotating platforms: An operational approach
,”
Found. Phys.
32
,
1525
1556
(
2002
).
11.
E.
Minguzzi
, “
Differential aging from acceleration: An explicit formula
,”
Am. J. Phys.
73
,
876
880
(
2005
).
12.
Ø.
Grøn
, “
The twin paradox and the principle of relativity
,”
Phys. Scr.
87
,
035004
(
2013
).
13.
E.
Eriksen
and
Ø.
Grøn
, “
Relativistic dynamics in uniformly accelerated reference frames with application to the clock paradox
,”
Eur. J. Phys.
11
,
39
44
(
1990
).
14.
M.
Planck
, “
Gleichförmige rotation und Lorentz-Kontraktion
,”
Phys. Z.
11
,
294
(
1910
).
15.
H. A.
Lorentz
, “
Michelson-Morley experiment and the dimensions of moving bodies
,”
Nature
106
,
793
795
(
1921
).
16.
A. S.
Eddington
,
The Mathematical Theory of Relativity
(
Cambridge U.P.
,
Cambridge
,
1923
), p.
50
.
17.
G. L.
Clark
, “
The mechanics of continuous matter in the relativity theory
,”
Proc. R. Soc. Edinburgh
62A
,
434
441
(
1947
).
18.
G.
Cavalleri
, “
Solution of Ehrenfest's paradox for a relativistic rotating disk
,”
Nuovo Cimento B
53
,
415
432
(
1968
).
19.
W. H.
Mc Crea
, “
Rotating relativistic ring
,”
Nature
234
,
399
401
(
1971
).
20.
E. M.
Dewan
and
M.
Beran
, “
Note on stress effects due to relativistic contraction
,”
Am. J. Phys.
27
,
517
518
(
1959
).
21.
E. M.
Dewan
, “
Stress effects due to Lorentz contraction
,”
Am. J. Phys.
31
,
383
386
(
1963
).
22.
Ø.
Grøn
, “
Relativistic description of a rotating disk with angular acceleration
,”
Found. Phys.
9
,
353
369
(
1979
).
23.
Ø.
Grøn
,
Lecture Notes on the General Theory of Relativity
(
Springer
,
New York
,
2009
), pp.
77
83
.
24.
Ø.
Grøn
, “
Relativistic description of a rotating disk
,”
Am. J. Phys.
43
,
869
876
(
1975
).
25.
A.
Sfarti
, “
The appearance of the objects rolling at relativistic speeds
,”
Can. J. Phys.
86
,
1437
1441
(
2008
).
26.
K.
Vøyenli
, “
Alternative derivation of the circumference of a relativistic, rotating disk
,”
Am. J. Phys.
45
,
876
877
(
1977
).
27.
K. Y.
Bliokh
and
F.
Nori
, “
Relativistic Hall effect
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
108
,
120403
(
2012
).
AAPT members receive access to the American Journal of Physics and The Physics Teacher as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.