Many physics teachers seek a simple illustration of Einstein's model of gravity, suitable for the introductory physics classroom. In this article, we show that an ordinary wall map of the world can be used to contrast Newton's and Einstein's explanations for why a ball falls when released. Trajectories on the map are analogous to the trajectories of the ball through spacetime, because the geometry of the map is remarkably similar to the geometry of spacetime near Earth's surface. To aid in the pedagogy, we focus on the concept of scale rather than curvature. We show that, contrary to popular visualizations of Einstein's model, it is primarily the warping of time, not space, that causes a ball to fall, and we address the question of why we do not see the distortion of spacetime around us. Finally, we recover Newton's results for the falling ball from our geometrical treatment.

1.
A.
Ashtekar
, “
Preface
,”
100 Years of Relativity. Space-Time Structure: Einstein and Beyond
, edited by
A.
Ashtekar
(
World Scientific Publishing Co.
,
Singapore
,
2005
).
2.
J.
Hartle
,
Gravity: An Introduction to Einstein's General Relativity
(
Addison-Wesley
,
Reading, MA
,
2002
). Also at <http://www.physics.ucsb.edu/~gravitybook/mathematica.html>.
3.
E. F.
Taylor
and
J. A.
Wheeler
,
Exploring Black Holes: Introduction to General Relativity
(
Addison Wesley Longman
,
Boston
,
2000
).
4.
K. S.
Thorne
, “
Classical black holes: The nonlinear dynamics of curved spacetime
,”
Science
337
,
536
538
(
2012
).
5.
For example,
Paul G.
Hewitt
,
Conceptual Physics
, 8th ed. (
Addison-Wesley
,
Reading, MA
,
1998
).
6.
C. W.
Chou
,
D. B.
Hume
,
T.
Rosenband
, and
D. J.
Wineland
, “
Optical clocks and relativity
,”
Science
329
,
1630
1632
(
2010
).
7.
This is also accounted for in Newton's model. See
P.
Mohazzabi
, “
Why do we feel weightless in free fall?
,”
Phys. Teach.
44
,
240
242
(
2006
).
8.
E. F.
Taylor
and
J. A.
Wheeler
,
Spacetime Physics
(
W.H. Freeman
,
San Francisco, CA
,
1966
).
9.

With the exception of a line headed due north, of course. But this path is also excluded from the spacetime diagram, since it corresponds to tossing a ball upwards at infinite speed.

10.
S.
Shapin
, “
Of gods and kings: Natural philosophy and politics in the Leibniz-Clarke disputes
,”
ISIS
72
(
2
),
187
215
(
1981
).
11.
H.
Erlichson
, “
The Leibniz-Clarke controversy: Absolute versus relative space and time
,”
Am. J. Phys.
35
,
89
98
(
1967
).
12.
B.
Riemann
, “
On the hypotheses which lie at the bases of geometry
,”
Nature
8
,
14
17
(
1873
).
13.

We use the spacelike form for convenience.

14.
C. W.
Misner
,
K. S.
Thorne
, and
J. A.
Wheeler
,
Gravitation
(
W.H. Freeman
,
San Francisco, CA
,
1973
).
15.
D.
Blair
and
G.
McNamara
,
Ripples on a Cosmic Sea: The Search for Gravitational Waves
(
Basic Books
,
New York
,
1999
).
AAPT members receive access to the American Journal of Physics and The Physics Teacher as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.