Topological quantum phases of matter are characterized by an intimate relationship between the Hamiltonian dynamics away from the edges and the appearance of bound states localized at the edges of the system. Elucidating this correspondence in the continuum formulation of topological phases, even in the simplest case of a one-dimensional system, touches upon fundamental concepts and methods in quantum mechanics that are not commonly discussed in textbooks, in particular the self-adjoint extensions of a Hermitian operator. We show how such topological bound states can be derived in a prototypical one-dimensional system. Along the way, we provide a pedagogical exposition of the self-adjoint extension method as well as the role of symmetries in correctly formulating the continuum, field-theory description of topological matter with boundaries. Moreover, we show that self-adjoint extensions can be characterized generally in terms of a conserved local current associated with the self-adjoint operator.

1.
T. F.
Jordan
,
Linear Operators for Quantum Mechanics
(
Dover
,
New York
,
2006
).
2.
G.
Bonneau
,
J.
Faraut
, and
G.
Valent
, “
Self-adjoint extensions of operators and the teaching of quantum mechanics
,”
Am. J. Phys.
69
,
322
331
(
2001
).
3.
B. A.
Bernevig
and
T.
Hughes
,
Topological Insulators and Topological Superconductors
(
Princeton U. P.
,
Princeton
,
2013
).
4.
S.-Q.
Shen
,
Topological Insulators
(
Springer
,
Berlin
,
2012
), Chap. 3.
5.
J.
von Neumann
, “
Allgemeine eigenwerttheorie hermitescher funktionaloperatoren
,”
Math. Ann.
102
,
49
131
(
1930
).
6.
D. M.
Gitman
,
I. V.
Tuytin
, and
B. L.
Voronov
,
Self-adjoint Extensions in Quantum Mechanics
(
Springer
,
New York
,
2012
).
7.
H.
Nishimori
and
G.
Ortiz
,
Elements of Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena
(
Oxford
U. P., New York
,
2011
).
8.

This is analogous to a nontrivial knot that cannot be undone without cutting. Locally, the knot has the same geometry as a loop; however, there is a global twist that distinguishes it from a simple loop. Technically, the twist in the wavefunction is expressed in terms of Berry's phases; see Ref. 3.

9.
A. Z.
Capri
, “
Self-adjointness and spontaneously broken symmetry
,”
Am. J. Phys.
45
,
823
825
(
1977
).
10.
V. S.
Araujo
,
F. A. B.
Coutinho
, and
J. F.
Perez
, “
Operator domains and self-adjoint operators
,”
Am. J. Phys.
72
,
203
213
(
2004
).
11.
F. A. B.
Coutinho
,
Y.
Nogami
, and
F. M.
Toyama
, “
General aspects of the bound-state solutions of the one-dimensional Dirac equation
,”
Am. J. Phys.
56
,
904
907
(
1988
).
12.

The transpose operation T is defined as (ϕ1(x)ϕ2(x))T=(ϕ1(x)ϕ2(x)).

13.
M.
Reed
and
B.
Simon
,
Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics I: Functional Analysis
(
Academic
,
New York
,
1972
).
14.

An absolutely continuous function ϕ on an interval I is defined as one for which there exists an integrable function ϕ that satisfies abϕ(x)dx=ϕ(b)ϕ(a) for any a,bI (see, for example, p. 22 in Ref. 6). Then, according to the fundamental theorem of calculus, ϕ=dϕ/dx almost everywhere in I.

15.

Note that the states ψ± do not belong to Δ(P) since ψ±(0),ψ±(L)=0.

16.
M.
Reed
and
B.
Simon
,
Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics II: Fourier analysis, Self-adjointness
(
Academic
,
New York
,
1975
).
17.
A. Y.
Kitaev
, “
Unpaired Majorana fermions in quantum wires
,”
Phys.-Usp.
44
,
131
136
(
2001
).
18.
S. R.
Elliott
and
M.
Franz
, “
Colloquium: Majorana fermions in nuclear, particle, and solid-state physics
,”
Rev. Mod. Phys.
87
,
137
163
(
2015
).
19.
See, e.g.,
W.
Rudin
,
Principles of Mathematical Analysis
, 3rd ed. (
McGraw Hill
,
New York
,
1976
), Chap. 7.
AAPT members receive access to the American Journal of Physics and The Physics Teacher as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.