We investigate here the question raised in the literature about the correct expression for the electromagnetic field momentum, especially when static or stationary fields are involved. For this, we examine a couple of simple but intriguing cases. First, we consider a system configuration in which electromagnetic field momentum is present even though the system is stationary. We trace the electromagnetic momentum to be present in the form of a continuous transport of electromagnetic energy from one part of the system to another, without causing any net change in the energy of the system. In a second case, we show that the electromagnetic momentum is zero irrespective of whether the charged system is static or in motion, even though the electromagnetic energy is present throughout. We demonstrate that the conventional formulation of electromagnetic field momentum describes the systems consistently without any real contradictions. Here, we also make exposition of a curiosity where electromagnetic energy decreases when the charged system gains velocity. Then we discuss the more general question that has been raised: Are the conventional formulas for energy-momentum of electromagnetic fields valid for all cases? Specifically, in the case of so-called “bound fields,” do we need to change to some modified definitions? We show that in all cases it is only the conventional formulas that lead to results consistent with the rest of physics, including the special theory of relativity, and that any proposed modifications are thus superfluous.

1.
R. H.
Romer
, “
Electromagnetic field momentum
,”
Am. J. Phys.
63
,
777
779
(
1995
).
2.
R. H.
Romer
, “
Angular momentum of static electromagnetic fields
,”
Am. J. Phys.
34
,
772
778
(
1966
).
3.
D. J.
Griffiths
, “
Resource letter EM-1: Electromagnetic momentum
,”
Am. J. Phys.
80
,
7
18
(
2012
).
4.
J. D.
Jackson
,
Classical Electrodynamics
, 2nd ed. (
Wiley
,
New York
,
1975
), Chaps. 6 and 17.
5.
W. K. H.
Panofsky
and
M.
Phillips
,
Classical Electricity and Magnetism
, 2nd ed. (
Addison-Wesley
,
Massachusetts
,
1962
), Chap. 21.
6.
D. J.
Griffiths
,
Introduction to Electrodynamics
, 3rd ed. (
Prentice
,
New Jersey
,
1999
), Chaps. 8 and 12.
7.
E. M.
Pugh
and
G. E.
Pugh
, “
Physical significance of the Poynting vector in static fields
,”
Am. J. Phys.
35
,
153
156
(
1967
).
8.
E. F.
Taylor
and
J. A.
Wheeler
,
Spacetime Physics: Introduction to Special Relativity
, 2nd ed. (
Freeman
,
New York
,
1992
), Chap. 5.
9.
A. K.
Singal
, “
On the ‘explanation’ of the null results of Trouton-Noble experiment
,”
Am. J. Phys.
61
,
428
433
(
1993
).
10.
F. T.
Trouton
and
H. R.
Noble
, “
The mechanical forces acting on a charged electric condenser moving through space
,”
Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. London A
202
,
165
181
(
1904
).
11.
F.
Rohrlich
, “
Self-energy and stability of the classical electron
,”
Am. J. Phys.
28
,
639
643
(
1960
).
12.
A. K.
Singal
, “
Energy-momentum of the self-fields of a moving charge in classical electromagnetism
,”
J. Phys. A
25
1605
1620
(
1992
).
13.
T. H.
Boyer
, “
Classical model of the electron and the definition of electromagnetic field momentum
,”
Phys. Rev. D
25
,
3246
3250
(
1982
).
14.
S. A.
Teukolsky
, “
The explanation of the Trouton-Noble experiment revisited
,”
Am. J. Phys.
64
,
1104
1109
(
1996
).
AAPT members receive access to the American Journal of Physics and The Physics Teacher as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.