It is widely believed that classical electromagnetism is either unphysical or inconsistent, owing to pathological behavior when self-force and radiation reaction are non-negligible. We argue that there is no inconsistency as long as it is recognized that certain types of charge distribution are simply impossible, such as, for example, a point particle with finite charge and finite inertia. This is owing to the fact that negative inertial mass is an unphysical concept in classical physics. It remains useful to obtain an equation of motion for small charged objects that describes their motion to good approximation without requiring knowledge of the charge distribution within the object. We give a simple method to achieve this, leading to a reduced-order form of the Abraham-Lorentz-Dirac equation, essentially as proposed by Eliezer, Landau, and Lifshitz and derived by Ford and O'Connell.
References
1.
J. S.
Nodvik
, “A covariant formulation of classical electrodynamics for charges of finite extension
,” Ann. Phys
28
, 225
–319
(1964
).2.
V.
Hnizdo
, “The Lorentz-Dirac equation, Lienard-Wiechart potentials, and radiation by a system of uniformly circling charges
,” Phys. Lett. A
129
, 426
–428
(1988
).3.
A. D.
Yaghjian
, Relativistic Dynamics of a Charged Sphere
, 2nd ed. (Springer-Verlag
, Berlin
, 2006
).4.
F.
Rohrlich
, “The dynamics of a charged sphere and the electron
,” Am. J. Phys.
65
, 1051
–1056
(1997
).5.
F.
Rohrlich
, “The self-force and radiation reaction
,” Am. J. Phys.
68
, 1109
–1112
(2000
).6.
A.
Gupta
and T.
Padmanabhan
, “Radiation from a charged particle and radiation reaction reexamined
,” Phys. Rev. D
57
, 7241
–7250
(1998
).7.
8.
P.
Caldirola
, “A new model of classical electron
,” Nuovo Cimento
3
(Supplemento 2
), 297
–343
(1956
).9.
J.
Schwinger
, “Electromagnetic mass revisited
,” Found. Phys.
13
, 373
–383
(1983
).10.
R.
Medina
, “Radiation reaction of a classical quasi-rigid extended particle
,” J. Phys. A
39
, 3801
–3816
(2006
), e-print: arXiv:physics/0508031.11.
D. J.
Griffiths
, T. C.
Proctor
, and D. F.
Schroeter
, “Abraham–Lorentz versus Landau–Lifshitz
,” Am. J. Phys.
78
, 391
–402
(2010
).12.
A. D.
Yaghjian
, “Absence of a consistent classical equation of motion for a mass-renormalized point charge
,” Phys. Rev. E
78
, 046606-1
–12
(2008
).13.
S. E.
Gralla
, A. I.
Harte
, and R. M.
Wald
, “Rigorous derivation of electromagnetic self-force
,” Phys. Rev. D
80
, 024031-1
–22
(2009
), arXiv:org/pdf/0905.2391.14.
D. A.
Burton
and A.
Noble
, “Aspects of electromagnetic radiation reaction in strong fields
,” Contemp. Phys.
55
, 110
–121
(2014
).15.
D.
Bohm
and M.
Weinstein
, “The self-oscillations of a charged particle
,” Phys. Rev.
74
, 1789
–1798
(1948
).16.
T.
Erber
, “The classical theories of radiation reaction
,” Fortsch. Phys.
9
, 343
–392
(1961
).17.
G. W.
Ford
and R. F.
O'Connell
, “Radiation reaction in electrodynamics and the elimination of runaway solutions
,” Phys. Lett. A
157
, 217
–220
(1991
).18.
K.
Wildermuth
, “Zur physikalischen Interpretation der Elektronenselbstbeschleunigung
,” Z. Naturf.
10A
, 450
–459
(1955
).19.
H.
Spohn
, Dynamics of Charged Particles and their Radiation Field
(Cambridge U.P.
, Cambridge
, 2004
), arXiv:math-ph/9908024.20.
P.
Pearle
, “Classical Electron Models
,” in Electromagnetism: Paths to Research
, edited by D.
Teplitz
(Plenum
, New York
, 1982
), pp. 211
–295
.21.
R.
Arnowitt
, S.
Deser
, and C. W.
Misner
, “Gravitational-electromagnetic coupling and the classical self-energy problem
,” Phys. Rev.
120
, 313
–320
(1960
).22.
R.
Arnowitt
, S.
Deser
, and C. W.
Misner
, “Interior Schwarzschild solutions and interpretation of source terms
,” Phys. Rev.
120
, 321
–324
(1960
).23.
P. A. M.
Dirac
, “Classical theory of radiating electrons
,” Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A
167
, 148
–169
(1938
).24.
F.
Rohrlich
, Classical Charged Particles
, 3rd ed. (Addison-Wesley
, Reading, MA
, 1990
).25.
G. W.
Ford
and R. F.
O'Connell
, “Relativistic form of radiation reaction
,” Phys. Lett. A
174
, 182
–184
(1993
).26.
C. J.
Eliezer
, “On the classical theory of particles
,” Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A
194
, 543
–555
(1948
).27.
L. D.
Landau
and E. M.
Lifshitz
, The Classical Theory of Fields
(Pergamon
, Oxford
, 1971
).28.
S. V.
Bulanov
, T. Z.
Esirkepov
, M.
Kando
, J. K.
Koga
, and S. S.
Bulanov
, “Lorentz-Abraham-Dirac versus Landau-Lifshitz radiation friction force in the ultrarelativistic electron interaction with electromagnetic wave (exact solutions)
,” Phys. Rev. E
84
, 056605-1
–10
(2011
).29.
A.
Zangwill
, Modern Electrodynamics
(Cambridge U.P.
, Cambridge
, 2012
).30.
R. F.
O'Connell
, “The equation of motion of an electron
,” Phys. Lett. A
313
, 491
–497
(2003
).31.
I learned from V. Hnizdo that the Landau-Lifshiftz equation was in the 1948 edition of their book (ready for printing in 1947), but not the 1941 Russian first edition. It therefore only slightly predates Eliezer's work, and the latter gave a different and independent argument for substantially the same conclusion.
32.
R. F.
O'Connell
, “Radiation reaction: General approach and applications, especially to electrodynamics
,” Contemp. Phys.
53
, 301
–313
(2012
).33.
A. M.
Steane
, “Nonexistence of the self-accelerating dipole and related questions
,” Phys. Rev. D
89
, 125006-1
–13
(2014
).34.
E. J.
Moniz
and D. H.
Sharp
, “Radiation reaction in nonrelativistic quantum electrodynamics
,” Phys. Rev. D
15
, 2850
–2865
(1977
).35.
J.
Frenkel
and R. B.
Santos
, “The self-force of a charged particle in classical electrodynamics with a cutoff
,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. B
13
, 315
–324
(1999
).36.
S. M.
Blinder
, “Structure and Self-Energy of the Electron
,” Int. J. Quant. Chem.
90
, 144
–147
(2002
).37.
A. M.
Steane
, “The fields and self-force of a constantly accelerating spherical shell
,” Proc. R. Soc. A
470
, 20130480
(2013
), e-print arXiv:physics:1307.5011.38.
F.
Intravaia
, R.
Behunin
, P. W.
Milonni
, G. W.
Ford
, and R. F.
O'Connell
, “Consistency of a causal theory of radiative reaction with the optical theorem
,” Phys. Rev. A
84
, 035801-1
–4
(2011
).© 2015 American Association of Physics Teachers.
2015
American Association of Physics Teachers
AAPT members receive access to the American Journal of Physics and The Physics Teacher as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.
