We introduce Problem Roulette (PR), a web-based study service at the University of Michigan that offers random-within-topic access to a large library of past exam problems in introductory physics courses. Built on public-private cloud infrastructure, PR served nearly 1000 students during Fall 2012 term, delivering more than 60,000 problem pages. The service complements that of commercial publishing houses by offering problems authored by local professors and by explicitly aligning topics with exam content. We describe the service architecture, including reporting and analytical capabilities, and present an initial evaluation of the impact of its use. Among roughly 500 students studying electromagnetism, we find that the 229 students who worked fifty or more problems over the term outperformed their complement by 0.40 grade points (on a 4.0 scale). This improvement partly reflects a selection bias that academically stronger students used the service more frequently. Adjusting for this selection bias, we find a grade point improvement of 0.22, significantly above the random noise level of 0.04. The simple message to students is that working five or more additional problems per week can lead to a quarter-letter grade improvement in introductory physics. Student comments emphasize the importance of randomness in helping them to synthesize concepts. The PR source code is publicly available.

1.
J.
Larkin
,
D. P.
Simon
,
H. A.
Simon
, and
J.
Mcdermott
, “
Expert and novice performance in solving physics problems
,”
Science
208
,
1335
1342
(
1980
).
2.
J. P.
Mestre
,
R. J.
Dufresne
,
W. J.
Gerace
,
P. T.
Hardiman
, and
J. S.
Touger
, “
Promoting skilled problem-solving behavior among beginning physics students
,”
J. Res. Sci. Teach.
30
,
303
317
(
1993
).
3.
Recent Enrollments in Introductory Physics Courses, Tech. rep., American Institute of Physics (
2013
), <http://www.aip.org/statistics/trends/reports/spring2013c.pdf/>.
4.
University of Michigan Almanac
2013
, <http://sitemaker.umich.edu/obpinfo/the_michigan_almanac/>.
5.
J.
Dunlosky
,
K. a.
Rawson
,
E. J.
Marsh
,
M. J.
Nathan
, and
D. T.
Willingham
, “
Improving students' learning with effective learning techniques: Promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology
,”
Psychol. Sci. Pub. Interest
14
,
4
58
(
2013
).
6.
M. Muñoz
Organero
, “
Sending learning pills to mobile devices in class to enhance student performance and motivation in network services configuration courses
,”
IEEE Trans. Educ.
55
,
83
87
(
2012
).
7.
The LearningOnline Network with CAPA, <http://www.lon-capa.org/>.
8.
Mastering Physics, <http://www.masteringphysics.com/>.
9.
L.
Lipponen
and
J.
Lallimo
, “
Assessing applications for collaboration: From collaboratively usable applications to collaborative technology
,”
British J. Educ. Technol.
35
,
433
442
(
2004
).
10.
P.
Krause
, “
Virtual university: A peer to peer open education network
,”
J. Inform. Technol. Educ.: Innov. Practice
10
,
133
156
(
2011
).
11.
R.
Warnakulasooriya
,
D. J.
Palazzo
, and
D. E.
Pritchard
, “
Time to completion of web-based physics problems with tutoring
,”
J. Exp. Anal. Behavior
88
,
103
113
(
2007
).
12.
C.
Wieman
, “
Why not try a scientific approach to science education?
,”
Change: Mag. Higher Learn.
39
,
9
15
(
2007
).
13.
C. M.
Roche
, “
Teaching, learning, and collaborating in the cloud: Applications of cloud computing for educators in post-secondary institutions
,”
J. Educ. Technol. Syst.
40
,
95
111
(
2012
).
14.
Google Drive, <https://drive.google.com/>.
15.
A.
Mitrovic
and
B.
Martin
, “
Evaluating the effects of open student models on learning
,”
Adapt. Hypermedia Adapt. Web-Based
2347
,
296
305
(
2002
).
16.
University of Michigan Web Services, <http://www.umich.edu/~umweb/services>.
17.
Amazon Web Services Elastic Cloud 2, <http://aws.amazon.com/ec2/>.
18.
D.
Goodman
,
Dynamic HTML: The Definitive Reference: A Comprehensive Resource for HTML, CSS, DOM & JavaScript
(
O'Reilly Media, Inc.
,
Sebastopol, CA
,
2002
).
19.
Expert Electronic Coaching at UM, <http://sitemaker.umich.edu/ecoach/home/>.
20.
21.
22.
Y.-J.
Lee
,
D.
Palazzo
,
R.
Warnakulasooriya
, and
D.
Pritchard
, “
Measuring student learning with item response theory
,”
Phys. Rev. Spec. Top.–Phys. Educ. Res.
4
(
1
),
010102
(
2008
).
23.
J. L.
Docktor
,
J. P.
Mestre
, and
B. H.
Ross
, “
Impact of a short intervention on novices' categorization criteria
,”
Phys. Rev. Spec. Top.–Phys. Educ. Res.
8
,
020102-1
11
(
2012
).
24.
R. E.
Teodorescu
,
C.
Bennhold
,
G.
Feldman
, and
L.
Medsker
, “
New approach to analyzing physics problems: A taxonomy of introductory physics problems
,”
Phys. Rev. Spec. Top.–Phys. Educ. Res.
9
,
010103-1
20
(
2013
).
25.
CoSign: Secure, Intra-Institutional Web Authentication, <http://weblogin.org/>.
26.
See supplementary material at http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.4894061 for the source code for Problem Roulette.

Supplementary Material

AAPT members receive access to the American Journal of Physics and The Physics Teacher as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.