Orbital angular momentum eigenfunctions are readily understood in terms of spherical harmonics. However, the quantum mechanical phenomenon of spin is often said to be mysterious and hard to visualize, with no classical analog. Many textbooks give a heuristic and somewhat unsatisfying picture of a precessing spin vector. Here, we show that the spin-coherent-state representation is a striking, elegant, and mathematically meaningful tool for visualizing spin states. We also demonstrate that cartographic projections such as the Hammer projection are useful for visualizing functions defined on spherical surfaces.

1.
D. J.
Griffiths
,
Introduction to Quantum Mechanics
, 2nd ed. (
Pearson
,
Upper Saddle River, NJ
,
2005
).
2.
D. A.
Miller
,
Quantum Mechanics for Scientists and Engineers
(
Cambridge U.P.
,
New York
,
2008
).
3.
R. L.
Liboff
,
Introductory Quantum Mechanics
, 4th ed. (
Addison-Wesley
,
Boston, MA
,
2003
).
4.
L. L.
Foldy
and
S. A.
Wouthuysen
, “
On the dirac theory of spin 1/2 particles and its non-relativistic limit
,”
Phys. Rev.
78
,
29
36
(
1950
).
5.
H.
Mendlowitz
, “
Simplified approach to spin in dirac theory
,”
Am. J. Phys.
26
(
1
),
17
24
(
1958
).
6.
H. C.
Ohanian
, “
What is spin?
,”
Am. J. Phys.
54
(
6
),
500
505
(
1986
).
7.
K.
Mita
, “
Virtual probability current associated with the spin
,”
Am. J. Phys.
68
(
3
),
259
264
(
2000
).
8.
D.
Hestenes
, “
Spin and uncertainty in the interpretation of quantum mechanics
,”
Am. J. Phys.
47
(
5
),
399
415
(
1979
).
9.
R. H.
Young
, “
Nonrelativistic rotating charged sphere as a model for particle spin
,”
Am. J. Phys.
44
(
6
),
581
588
(
1976
).
10.

The terminology is unfortunate: a “coherent state” is not merely “a state that exhibits quantum coherence,” but rather has a much more specific meaning.

11.
J. R.
Klauder
, “
The action option and a Feynman quantization of spinor fields in terms of ordinary c-numbers
,”
Ann. Phys.
11
,
123
168
(
1960
).
12.
J. M.
Radcliffe
, “
Some properties of coherent spin states
,”
J. Phys. A
4
,
313
(
1971
).
13.
F. T.
Arecchi
,
E.
Courtens
,
R.
Gilmore
, and
H.
Thomas
, “
Atomic coherent states in quantum optics
,”
Phys. Rev. A
6
,
2211
2237
(
1972
).
14.
A.
Perelomov
, “
Coherent states for arbitrary Lie group
,”
Comm. Math. Phys.
26
,
222
236
(
1972
).
15.
J. R.
Klauder
, “
Path integrals and stationary-phase approximations
,”
Phys. Rev. D
19
,
2349
2356
(
1979
).
16.
J. R.
Klauder
and
B.-S.
Skagerstam
,
Coherent States: Applications in Physics and Mathematical Physics
(
World Scientific
,
Singapore
,
1985
).
17.
A.
Auerbach
,
Interacting Electrons and Quantum Magnetism
, Graduate Texts in Contemporary Physics (
Springer
,
New York
,
1998
).
18.
P. K.
Aravind
, “
Spin coherent states as anticipators of the geometric phase
,”
Am. J. Phys.
67
(
10
),
899
904
(
1999
).
19.
J. J.
Sakurai
,
Advanced Quantum Mechanics
(
Addison-Wesley
,
Boston
,
1967
).
20.
J. P.
Snyder
,
Flattening the Earth: Two Thousand Years of Map Projections
(
University of Chicago Press
,
Chicago
,
1993
).
21.
S.
Montgomery
and
L.
Groat
, “
Student learning styles and their implications for teaching
,” CRLT Occasional Paper, Center for Research on Learning and Teaching, University of Michigan (
1999
).
AAPT members receive access to the American Journal of Physics and The Physics Teacher as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.