This study investigates the belief that solving a large number of physics problems helps students better learn physics. We investigated the number of problems solved, student confidence in solving these problems, academic achievement, and the level of conceptual understanding of 49 science high school students enrolled in upper-level physics classes from Spring 2010 to Summer 2011. The participants solved an average of 2200 physics problems before entering high school. Despite having solved so many problems, no statistically significant correlation was found between the number of problems solved and academic achievement on either a mid-term or physics competition examination. In addition, no significant correlation was found between the number of physics problems solved and performance on the Force Concept Inventory (FCI). Lastly, four students were selected from the 49 participants with varying levels of experience and FCI scores for a case study. We determined that their problem solving and learning strategies was more influential in their success than the number of problems they had solved.
REFERENCES
1.
B. E.
Woolnough
, “Why students choose physics, or reject it
,” Phys. Educ.
29
, 368
–374
(1994
).2.
C.
Williams
, M.
Stanisstreet
, K.
Spall
, E.
Boyes
, and D.
Dickson
, “Why aren't secondary students interested in physics?
,” Phys. Educ.
38
(4
), 324
–329
(2003
).3.
J.
Kwon
, “Is physics really difficulty and not funny?
,” Phys. High Tech.
13
(4
), 2
–7
(2004
).4.
H.
Kim
and B.
Lee
, “Why do secondary students perceive physics is uninteresting and difficult?
,” New Phys.
52
(6
), 521
–529
(2006
).5.
C.
Angell
, Ø.
Guttersrud
, E. K.
Henriksen
, and A.
Isnes
, “Physics: Frightful, but fun. pupils' and teachers' views of physics and physics teaching
,” Sci. Educ.
88
(5
), 683
–706
(2004
).6.
G.
Lee
, “Why do students have difficulties in learning physics?: Toward a structural analysis of student difficulty via a framework of knowledge & belief
,” New Phys.
54
(4
), 284
–295
(2007
).7.
L.
Hsu
, E.
Brewe
, T. M.
Foster
, and K. A.
Harper
, “Resource letter RPS-1: Research in problem solving
,” Am. J. Phys.
72
(9
), 1147
–1156
(2004
).8.
H. A.
Simon
and A.
Newell
, “Human problem solving: The state of the theory in 1970
,” Am. Psychol.
26
(2
), 145
–159
(1971
).9.
F.
Reif
and J. I.
Heller
, “Knowledge structure and problem solving in physics
,” Educ. Psychol.
17
(2
), 102
–127
(1982
).10.
F.
Reif
, “How can chemists teach problem solving? Suggestions derived from studies of cognitive processes
,” J. Chem. Educ.
60
(11
), 948
–953
(1983
).11.
A. V.
Heuvelen
, “Learning to think like a physicst: A review of research-based instructional strategies
,” Am. J. Phys.
59
(10
), 891
–897
(1991
).12.
J. H.
Larkin
and F.
Reif
, “Understanding and teaching problem solving in physics
,” Euro. J. Sci. Educ.
1
(2
), 191
–203
(1979
).13.
14.
J. H.
Larkin
, J.
McDermott
, D. P.
Simon
, and H. A.
Simon
, “Expert and novice performance in solving physics problems
,” Science
208
(4450
), 1335
–1342
(1980
).15.
M. T. H.
Chi
, P. J.
Feltovich
, and R.
Glaser
, “Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices
,” Cogn. Sci.
5
(2
), 121
–152
(1981
).16.
D. R.
Woods
, “Problem Solving in Practice
,” in What Research Says to the Science Teacher
, edited by D. L.
Gabel
(National Science Teachers Association
, Washington DC
, 1989
).17.
Y.
Park
, “Variables Related to Selection of Metal Representation and Problem Solving Strategy During Mechanics Problem Solving
,” The Ohio State University
, Ph. D thesis, 1990
.18.
R. J.
Dufresne
, W. J.
Gerace
, P. T.
Hardiman
, and J. P.
Mestre
, “Constraining novices to perform expert-like problem analyses: Effects on schema acquisition
,” J. Learn. Sci.
2
(3
), 307
–331
(1992
).19.
D. P.
Maloney
, “Research on Problem Solving: Physics
,” in Handbook of Research on Science Teaching and Learning Project
, edited by D. L.
Gabel
(Macmillan Publishing Company
, New York, NY
, 1994
).20.
C.
Henderson
, E.
Yerushalmi
, V. H.
Kuo
, P.
Heller
, and K.
Heller
, “Grading student problem solutions: The challenge of sending a consistent message
,” Am. J. Phys.
72
(2
), 164
–169
(2004
).21.
D.
Jonassen
, “Toward a design theory of problem solving
,” Educ. Tech. Res. Dev.
48
(4
), 63
–85
(2000
).22.
S.
Kim
, “The effects of awareness of problem type familiarity and problem relevance on ill-structured problem-solving process and achievement
,” J. Educ. Tech.
24
(2
), 105
–128
(2008
).23.
J.
Tuminaro
and E. F.
Redish
, presented at the 2003 Physics Education Research Conference, University of Maryland, College Park
, 2004
.24.
E.
Kim
and S.
Pak
, “Students do not overcome conceptual difficulties after solving 1000 traditional problems
,” Am. J. Phys.
70
(7
), 759
–765
(2002
).25.
26.
J.
Choi
, J.
Park
, and I.
Koo
, “Effects of self-directed and unself-directed prior learning on student attitude towards science class
,” J. Korean Assoc. Sci. Educ.
27
(9
), 765
–777
(2007
).27.
K.
Kim
and Y.
Hwang
, “Determinants of demand for shadow education of middle school students
,” Korea Educ. Rev.
15
(1
), 77
–105
(2009
).28.
B.
Youm
, “A Study on the effects of private education expenditure on academic achievements and the alternatives
,” Dong-Eui University
, Ph.D. thesis, 2011
.29.
S.
Kim
, “A Study on the Actual Condition of Mathematics Precede Learning: Based on the Middle School first grade
,” Keimyung University
, Master's thesis, 2006
.30.
J.
Park
, “The type of out-of-school studies, degrees of satisfaction and the students' academic performances
,” Seoul National University
, Master's thesis, 1998
.31.
32.
J. H.
Larkin
, “Skilled problem solving in physics: A hierarchical planning model
,” Working paper, Group in Science and Mathematics Education
, University of California
, Berkeley
, 1977
.33.
F.
Reif
, J. H.
Larkin
, and G. C.
Brackett
, “Teaching general learning and problem-solving skills
,” Am. J. Phys.
44
, 212
–217
(1976
).34.
D.
Hestenes
, “Toward a modeling theory of physics instruction
,” Am. J. Phys.
55
(5
), 440
–454
(1987
).35.
C.
Mettes
, A.
Pilot
, H. J.
Roossink
, and H.
Kramers-Pals
, “Teaching and learning problem solving in Science. Part I: A general strategy
,” J. Chem. Educ.
57
(12
), 882
(1980
).36.
C.
Mettes
, A.
Pilot
, H. J.
Roossink
, and H.
Kramers-Pals
, “Teaching and learning problem solving in science: Part II: Learning problem solving in a thermodynamics course
,” J. Chem. Educ.
58
(1
), 51
(1981
).37.
M. J.
Fraser
, “Solving chemical problem
,” Chem. Soc. Rev.
11
(2
), 171
–190
(1982
).38.
J. B.
Tingle
and R.
Good
, “Effects of cooperative grouping on stoichiometric problem solving in high school chemistry
,” J. Res. Sci. Teach.
27
(7
), 671
–683
(1990
).39.
K.
Heller
and P.
Heller
, “The competent problem solver
,” University of Minnesota (1992
).40.
D. M.
Bunce
and H.
Heikkinen
, “The effects of an explicit problem solving approach on mathematical chemistry achievement
,” J. Res. Sci. Teach.
23
(1
), 11
–20
(1986
).41.
J. R.
Hayes
, The Complete Problem Solver
, 2nd ed. (Lawrence Earlbaum Associates
, Hillsdale
, 1989
).42.
T.
Byun
, S.
Ha
, and G.
Lee
, “Identifying student difficulty in problem solving process via the framework of the House Model (HM)
,” AIP Conf. Proc.
1064
, 87
–90
(2008
).43.
T.
Byun
, S.
Ha
, and G.
Lee
, “Toward understanding student difficulty in upper-level mechanics problem-solving processes
,” SNU J. Educ. Res.
19
, 145
–165
(2010
).44.
Explanations of a relationship between self-efficacy and self-confidence are given in
A.
Bandura
, “Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change
,” Psychol. Rev.
84
(2
), 191
–215
(1977
);
[PubMed]
A.
Bandura
, Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory
(Prentice-Hall, Inc
, New Jersey
, 1986
);B. J.
Zimmerman
, “Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview
,” Educ. Psychol.
25
(1
), 3
–17
(1990
).45.
D. H.
Schunk
, “Self-efficacy perspective on achievement behavior
,” Educ. Psychol.
19
(1
), 48
–58
(1984
).46.
P. R.
Pintrich
and E. V.
De Groot
, “Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance
,” J. Educ. Psychol.
82
(1
), 33
–40
(1990
).47.
K. D.
Multon
, S. D.
Brown
, and R. W.
Lent
, “Relation of self-efficacy beliefs to academic outcomes: A meta-analytic investigation
,” J. Counsel. Psychol.
38
(1
), 30
–38
(1991
).48.
B. J.
Zimmerman
, “Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn
,” Contemporary Educ. Psychol.
25(1)
, 82
–91
(2000
).49.
S. E.
Cooper
and D. A.
Robinson
, “The relationship of mathematics self-efficacy beliefs to mathematics anxiety and performance
,” Meas. Eval. Counsel. Dev.
24
(1
), 4
–11
(1991
).50.
F.
Pajares
and M. D.
Miller
, “Role of self-efficacy and self-concept beliefs in mathematical problem solving: A path analysis
,” J. Educ. Psychol.
86
(2
), 193
–203
(1994
).51.
E.
Gillibrand
, “Girls' participation in physics in single sex classes in mixed schools in relation to confidence and achievement
,” Int. J. Sci. Educ.
21
(4
), 349
–362
(1999
).52.
K.
Jeon
, I.
Seo
, and T.
Noh
, “Chemistry problem-solving ability and self-efficacy
,” J. Korean Assoc. Sci. Educ.
20
(2
), 214
–220
(2000
).53.
A. A.
Gungor
, A.
Eryılmaz
, and T.
Fakıoglu
, “The relationship of freshmen's physics achievement and their related affective characteristics
,” J. Res. Sci. Teach.
44
(8
), 1036
–1056
(2007
).54.
C. Y.
Chang
and W. Y.
Cheng
, “Science achievement and students' self-confidence and Interest in Science: A Taiwanese representative sample study
,” Int. J. Sci. Educ.
30
(9
), 1183
–1200
(2008
).55.
J.
Kwon
and S.
Lee
, “A comparative analysis of expert's and novice's thinking processes in solving physics problems
,” J. Korean Assoc. Sci. Educ.
8
(1
), 43
–56
(1988
).56.
Y.
Park
and Y.
Cho
, “Analysis of physics problem solving processes of high school students to qualitative and quantitative problems
,” J. Korean Assoc. Sci. Educ.
25
(4
), 526
–532
(2005
).57.
J.
Sweller
, “Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning
,” Cogn. Sci.
12
(2
), 257
–285
(1989
).58.
J.
Seo
, J.
Choi
, and Y.
Kim
, “Comparison of life learning skills of gifted science students and normal students in high school
,” Korean J. Bio. Educ.
35
(1
), 61
–72
(2007
).59.
D.
Hestenes
, M.
Wells
, and G.
Swackhamer
, “Force Concept Inventory
,” Phys. Teach.
30
(3
), 141
–158
(1992
).60.
M. Q.
Patton
, Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods
, 2nd ed. (Sage Publications, Inc.
, Newbury Park, CA
, 1990
).61.
S. B.
Merriam
, Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education
, 2nd ed. (Jossey-Bass Publishers
, San Francisco
, 1998
).62.
63.
64.
D.
Halliday
, R.
Resnick
, and J.
Walker
, Fundamentals of Physics
, 8th ed. (John Wiley & Sons
, Hoboken, NJ
, 2008
).65.
R. A.
Serway
and J. W.
Jewett
, Physics for Scientists and Engineers
, 7th ed. (Thomson Brooks/Cole
, Belmont, CA
, 2006
).66.
H. D.
Young
, R. A.
Freedman
, A. L.
Ford
, and F. W.
Sears
, Sears and Zemansky's University Physics: With Modern Physics
, 12th ed. (Pearson Addison-Wesley
, San Francisco
, 2008
).67.
Seoul Nation University Physics textbook committee,
New University Physics
(Kyomunsa
, Seoul
, 2002
).68.
69.
H.
Ko
, “The relationship among the amount of preceding learning, the academic achievements, and the attitude toward learning in middle-school student's mathematics
,” Changwon University
, Master's thesis, 2004
.70.
B.
Lee
and S.
Lee
, “The reasons for students having difficulty in solving an advanced physics problem
,” New Phys.
49
(1
), 37
–43
(2004
).71.
J.
Park
, “A Study on the relationships between self-efficacy, learning strategies, practical intelligence and academic achievement
,” J. Educ. Res. Mokpo Nat. Univ.
14
(1
), 207
–228
(2002
).72.
Y.
Ko
, “The Effects of Creativity and Problem-solving Ability of Elementary School Students on Their Academic Achievement
,” Dong-A University
, Master's thesis, 2011
.73.
R. R.
Hake
, “Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses
,” Am. J. Phys.
66
(1
), 64
–74
(1998
).74.
L. C.
McDermott
and E. F.
Redish
, “Resource letter PER-1: Physics education research
,” Am. J. Phys.
67
(9
), 755
–767
(1999
).75.
D.
Kim
and E.
Cho
, “Science high school students' concepts of force and motion
,” Bull. Sci. Educ.
13
, 59
–68
(1997
).76.
J.
Kim
, “Comparison of concepts on force between gifted students and college students
,” New Phys.
58
(4
), 403
–408
(2009
).77.
We provided more detailed descriptions about the results of this study in Byun's thesis.
T.
Byun
, “An Understanding of Students' Physics Problem Solving Processes by Using House Model,”
Seoul National University
, 2012
.78.
M. S.
Sabella
and E. F.
Redish
, “Knowledge organization and activation in physics problem solving
,” Am. J. Phys.
75
(11
), 1017
–1029
(2007
).© 2014 American Association of Physics Teachers.
2014
American Association of Physics Teachers
AAPT members receive access to the American Journal of Physics and The Physics Teacher as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.
