We give an introduction to the QBist interpretation of quantum mechanics, which removes the paradoxes, conundra, and pseudo-problems that have plagued quantum foundations for the past nine decades. As an example, we show in detail how this interpretation eliminates “quantum nonlocality.”
REFERENCES
1.
N.
Bohr
, Atomic Theory and the Description of Nature
(Cambridge U.P.
, Cambridge, UK
, 1961
), p. 18.2.
N.
Bohr
, Essays 1958–1962 on Atomic Physics and Human Knowledge
(Ox Bow Press
, Woodbridge, CT
, 1987
), p. 10
.3.
A.
Einstein
, B.
Podolsky
, and N.
Rosen
, “Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?
” Phys. Rev.
47
, 777
–780
(1935
).4.
C. A.
Fuchs
, “QBism, the Perimeter of Quantum Bayesianism
,” e-print arXiv:1003.5209 (2010
).5.
6.
7.
J. M.
Bernardo
and A. F. M.
Smith
, Bayesian Theory
(Wiley
, Chichester
, 1994
).8.
R.
Jeffrey
, Subjective Probability. The Real Thing
(Cambridge U.P.
, Cambridge, UK
, 2004
).9.
D. V.
Lindley
, Understanding Uncertainty
(Wiley
, Hoboken, NJ
, 2006
).10.
“Agent” in the sense of one who acts (and not in the sense of one who represents another). We follow the widespread practice in the quantum-information community of calling the agent Alice, and a second agent she might have dealings with, Bob.
11.
C. A.
Fuchs
and R.
Schack
, “Quantum-Bayesian coherence
,” Rev. Mod. Phys.
85
, 1693
–1715
(2013
).12.
J. S.
Bell
, “Against ‘Measurement
’,” Phys. World
3
(8
), 33
–40
(1990
).13.
C. A.
Fuchs
, Coming of Age with Quantum Information: Notes on a Paulian Idea
(Cambridge U.P.
, Cambridge, UK
, 2010
), p. 310
et passim.14.
C. M.
Caves
, C. A.
Fuchs
, and R.
Schack
, “Quantum probabilities as Bayesian probabilities
,” Phys. Rev. A
65
, 022305
(2002
).15.
L. D.
Landau
and E. M.
Lifshitz
, Quantum Mechanics: Non-relativistic Theory
, 2nd ed. (Pergamon Press
, Oxford
, 1965
), pp. 2
–3
.16.
N.
Bohr
, Philosophical Writings of Niels Bohr
, Vol. 2
(Ox Bow Press
, Woodbridge, CT
, 1987
), p. 72
.17.
D.
Bohm
, “A Suggested Interpretation of the Quantum Theory in Terms of ‘Hidden’ Variables, I and II
,” Phys. Rev.
85
, 166
–193
(1952
).18.
D.
Deutsch
and P.
Hayden
, “Information flow in entangled quantum systems
,” Proc. R. Soc. London Ser A
456
, 1759
–1774
(2000
).19.
F. J.
Tipler
, “Does Quantum Nonlocality Exist? Bell's Theorem and the Many-Worlds Interpretation
,” e-print arXiv:quant-ph/0003146 (2000
).20.
G.
Bacciagaluppi
, “Remarks on Space-Time and Locality in Everett's Interpretation
,” in Non-locality and Modality
, edited by T.
Placek
and J.
Butterfield
(Kluwer
, Dordrecht
, 2002
), p. 105
.21.
R. B.
Griffiths
, “Quantum locality
,” Found. Phys.
41
, 705
–733
(2011
).22.
A.
Peres
and D. R.
Terno
, “Quantum information and relativity theory
,” Rev. Mod. Phys.
76
, 93
–123
(2004
).23.
24.
A.
Peres
, “Unperformed experiments have no results
,” Am. J. Phys.
46
, 745
–747
(1978
).25.
B.
de Finetti
, “Probabilism
,” Erkenntnis
31
, 169
–223
(1989
).26.
If she assigns E a probability p, replace “one dollar” by “p dollars”.
27.
N.
Bohr
, “Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?
” Phys. Rev.
48
, 696
–702
(1935
).28.
J. S.
Bell
, “On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox
,” Physics
1
, 195
–200
(1964
).29.
J. S.
Bell
, Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics: Collected Papers on Quantum Philosophy
(Cambridge U.P.
, Cambridge, UK
, 2004
).30.
Examples of this can be found in recent papers by Pusey, Barrett, and Rudolph (Ref. 31) and Colbeck and Renner (Ref. 32), along with much of the literature these papers have prompted.
31.
M. F.
Pusey
, J.
Barrett
, and T.
Rudolph
, “On the reality of the quantum state
,” Nature Phys.
8
, 475
–478
(2012
).32.
R.
Colbeck
and R.
Renner
, “Is a System's Wave Function in One-to-One Correspondence with Its Elements of Reality?
” Phys. Rev. Lett.
108
, 150402
(2012
).33.
E.
Schrödinger
, in Eine Entdeckung von ganz ausserordentlicher Tragweite: Schrödingers Briefwechsel zur Wellenmechanik und zum Katzenparadoxon
, edited by K.
von Meyenn
(Springer
, Berlin
, 2011
), p. 490
.34.
S.
Freud
, “The Future of an Illusion
”, in Mass Psychology and Other Writings
(Penguin Books
, 2004
).35.
E.
Schrödinger
, ‘Nature and the Greeks and Science and Humanism
’ (Cambridge U.P.
, Cambridge, UK
, 1951
).36.
W.
Heisenberg
, Physics and Philosophy: The Revolution in Modern Science
(Prometheus Books
, Amherst, NY
, 1999
).37.
R.
Peierls
, “In Defence of ‘Measurement
’,” Phys. World
4
(1
), 19
–21
(1991
).© 2014 American Association of Physics Teachers.
2014
American Association of Physics Teachers
AAPT members receive access to the American Journal of Physics and The Physics Teacher as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.
