The recent discovery of thirteen new and distinct three-body periodic planar orbits suggests that many more such orbits remain undiscovered. Searches in two-dimensional subspaces of the full four-dimensional space of initial conditions require computing resources that are available to many students, and the required level of computational and numerical expertise is also at the advanced undergraduate level. We discuss the methods for solving the planar three-body equations of motion, as well as some basic strategies and tactics for searches of periodic orbits. Our discussion should allow interested undergraduates to start their own searches. Users can submit new three-body orbits to a wiki-based website.

1.
J. V.
José
and
E. J.
Saletan
,
Classical Dynamics: A Contemporary Approach
(
Cambridge U.P.
,
Cambridge
,
1998
), Chap. 7.5.
2.
D.
Hestenes
,
New Foundations for Classical Mechanics
, 2nd ed. (
Kluwer Academic Publishers
,
New York
,
1999
), Sec. 6-5.
3.
H.
Goldstein
,
C.
Poole
, and
J.
Safko
,
Classical Mechanics
, 3rd ed. (
Addison-Wesley
,
San Francisco
,
2000
), Chap. 11.
4.
W.
Greiner
,
Classical Mechanics: Systems of Particles and Hamiltonian Dynamics
(
Springer-Verlag
,
New York
,
2003
), Chaps. 21–25.
5.
T. W. B.
Kibble
and
F. H.
Berkshire
,
Classical Mechanics
, 5th ed. (
Imperial College Press
,
London
,
2004
), Chap. 14.
6.
F.
Scheck
,
Classical Mechanics: Systems of Particles and Hamiltonian Dynamics
, 4th ed. (
Springer-Verlag
,
New York
,
2005
), Chap. 6.
7.
J. M.
Finn
,
Classical Mechanics
(
Infinity Science Press
,
Hingham, MA
,
2008
), Chap. 5.4.
8.
James A.
Blackburn
,
M. A. H.
Nerenberg
, and
Y.
Beaudoin
, “
Satellite motion in the vicinity of the triangular libration points
,”
Am. J. Phys.
45
,
1077
1081
(
1977
).
9.
Richard
Greenberg
and
Donald R.
Davis
, “
Stability at potential maxima: The L4 and L5 points of the restricted three-body problem
,”
Am. J. Phys.
46
,
1068
1070
(
1978
).
10.
M.
Šuvakov
and
V.
Dmitrašinović
, “
Three classes of Newtonian three-body planar periodic orbits
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
110
,
114301
(
2013
).
11.
E. H.
Bruns
, “
Uber die Integrale des Vielkörper-Problems
,”
Acta Math.
11
,
25
96
(
1887
).
12.
J. L.
Lagrange
, “
Essai sur le problème des trois corps
,”
Oeuvres tome 6; Miscellanea Taurinensia
4
,
118
243
(
1772
); J. L. Lagrange, Oeuvres, 2, pp. 67–121; J. L. Lagrange, Mécanique Analytique, pp. 262–286; 2nd ed. 2, pp. 108–286; J. L. Lagrange, Oeuvres 12, pp. 101–114.
13.
Jean d'Alembert, in a paper of 1761 mentions that Euler had given a method for integrating a certain differential equation “in 1740 (seven years before there was question of the Problem of Three Bodies).” See d'Alembert, “Opuscules Mathématiques,” Vol. 2, Paris 1761, Quatorziéme Mémoire (“Réflexions sur le Probléme des trois Corps, avec de Nouvelles Tables de la Lune…”) pp. 329–312, at Sec. VI, p. 245. Euler's original publication is probably
L.
Euler
,
Nov. Comm. Acad. Imp. Petropolitanae
,
10
,
207
242
;
L.
Euler
,
Nov. Comm. Acad. Imp. Petropolitanae
11
,
152
184
;
L.
Euler
,
Mémoires de l'Acad. de Berlin
,
11
,
228
249
. A more recent textbook dealing with Eulerian solutions is Ref. 37, albeit also without the original reference.
14.
R.
Broucke
and
D.
Boggs
, “
Periodic orbits in the planar general three-body problem
,”
Celest. Mech.
11
,
13
38
(
1975
).
15.
J. D.
Hadjidemetriou
, “
The continuation of periodic orbits from the restricted to the general three-body problem
,”
Celest. Mech.
12
,
155
174
(
1975
).
16.
J. D.
Hadjidemetriou
and
Th.
Christides
, “
Families of periodic orbits in the planar three-body problem
,”
Celest. Mech.
12
,
175
187
(
1975
).
17.
J. D.
Hadjidemetriou
, “
The stability of periodic orbits in the three-body problem
,”
Celest. Mech.
12
,
255
276
(
1975
).
18.
R.
Broucke
, “
On relative periodic solutions of the planar general three-body problem
,”
Celest. Mech.
12
,
439
462
(
1975
).
19.
M.
Henon
, “
A family of periodic solutions of the planar three-body problem, and their stability
,”
Celest. Mech.
13
,
267
285
(
1976
).
20.
M.
Henon
, “
Stability of interplay motions
,”
Celest. Mech.
15
,
243
261
(
1977
).
21.
C.
Moore
, “
Braids in classical gravity
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
70
,
3675
3679
(
1993
).
22.
A.
Chenciner
and
R.
Montgomery
, “
A remarkable periodic solution of the three-body problem in the case of equal masses
,”
Ann. Math.
152
,
881
901
(
2000
).
23.
C.
Simó
, “
Dynamical properties of the figure eight solution of the three-body problem
,”
in Celestial Mechanics
, edited by
Alain
Chenciner
,
Richard
Cushman
,
Clark
Robinson
, and
Zhihong
Jeff Xia
(
AMS
,
Providence, RI
,
2002
).
24.
M.
Šuvakov
, “
Numerical search for periodic solutions in the vicinity of the figure-eight orbit: Slaloming around singularities on the shape sphere
,” e-print arXiv:1312.7002.
25.
B.
Leimkuhler
and
S.
Reich
,
Simulating Hamiltonian Dynamics
(
Cambridge U.P.
,
Cambridge
,
2004
), Chaps. 1–4.
26.
A. S.
Richardson
and
J. M.
Finn
, “
Symplectic integrators with adaptive time steps
,” e-print arXiv:1108.0322v1.
27.
Erwin
Fehlberg
, “Low-order classical Runge-Kutta formulas with step size control and their application to some heat transfer problems,” NASA Technical Report 315 (1969) (unpublished). See also “
Klassische Runge-Kutta-Formeln vierter und niedrigerer Ordnung mit Schrittweiten-Kontrolle und ihre Anwendung auf Wärmeleitungsprobleme
,”
Computing (Arch. Elektron. Rechnen)
6
,
61
71
(
1970
).
28.
Ernst
Hairer
,
Syvert
Nørsett
, and
Gerhard
Wanner
,
Solving Ordinary Differential Equations I: Nonstiff Problems
, 2nd ed. (
Springer-Verlag
,
Berlin
,
1993
), Chap. II.5.
29.
More formally τ(X0,T0)=argmintT0|X(t)X0| Here || presents the Euclidean norm, but for other purposes (for example, searching for the reduced periodic solution) different metrics can be used.
30.
The numerical precision ε gives an upper bound of the error, which is defined as the phase-space distance from the numerical value to the exact solution at each time step; we used ε=1015 in our computations. General (for example, Cauchy-Peano's existence) theorems guarantee the existence of an exact solution to the initial value problem (away from the poles). See
E. A.
Coddington
and
N.
Levinson
,
Theory of Ordinary Differential Equations
, (
McGraw-Hill
,
New York
,
1955
), Chaps. 1–2, or Gerald Teschl, Ordinary Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems (Am. Math. Soc., Providence, 2012), Chaps. 2.2–2.5. Numerical analysis provides a piecewise-linear approximation to this exact solution, the convergence of which depends on the approximation method.
31.
T.
Iwai
, “
A geometric setting for internal motions of the quantum three-body system
,”
J. Math. Phys.
28
,
964
, 1315–1326 (
1987
).
32.
R.
Montgomery
, “
The N-body problem, the braid group, and action-minimizing periodic solutions
,”
Nonlinearity
11
,
363
376
(
1998
).
33.
The applet is available at <suki.ipb.ac.rs/3points/>.
34.
R.
Montgomery
, “
The zero angular momentum, three-body problem: All but one solution has syzygies
,”
Ergodic Theor. Dyn. Syst.
27
(
6
),
1933
1946
(
2007
).
35.
A “syzygy” is a collinear configuration, or equivalently a point on the equator of the shape sphere.
36.
Carl Gustav
Jacob Jacobi
,
Vorlesungen über Dynamik, Gesammelte Werke
, Vol.
VIII
, Supplement (
1884
); reprinted by (
Chelsea Publishing Company
,
New York
,
1969
), pp.
221
231
.
37.
L. A.
Pars
,
Analytical Dynamics
(
Heinemann
,
London
,
1965
), Chap. XXIX.
38.
A.
Sommerfeld
,
Mechanik
, 4th ed. (
1949
), Chap. 32. Translated into English by Martin O. Stern and published as Mechanics (
Academic Press
,
New York
,
1952
).
39.
E. T.
Whittaker
,
A Treatise on the Analytical Dynamics of Particles and Rigid Bodies, with an Introduction to the Problem of Three Bodies
, 4th ed. (
Dover Publications
,
New York
,
1937
), Chap. 170.
40.
Jan A.
Snyman
,
Practical Mathematical Optimization: An Introduction to Basic Optimization Theory and Classical and New Gradient-Based Algorithms
(
Springer
,
New York
,
2005
).
41.
L. D.
Landau
and
E. M.
Lifshitz
,
Mechanics
, 3rd ed. (
Butterworth-Heinemann
,
Oxford
,
1976
), Sec. 10.
42.
Here the first mass is shifted into the position of the second, the second into the third, and the third into the position of the first.
43.
See supplementary material at http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.4867608 for <suki.ipb.ac.rs/3body/>, for Orbitopedia, <www.orbitopedia.org/>.
44.
Marija R.
Janković
and
Milovan
Šuvakov
, “
Extension of the Broucke-Hadjidemetriou-Henon family of periodic orbits in the Newtonian planar three-body problem
,” manuscript in preparation.
45.

We assume, without loss of generality, that the trajectory initially lies above the equator (see Fig. 11) and follows one of the upper directed semi-circles described by one of the caligraphic letters {A,B,E,F}. At each equator crossing the subset of caligraphic letters that describe the trajectory changes from the “upper” subset {A,B,E,F} to the “lower” subset {C,D,G,H} and vice versa. We need to count the number of equator-crossings, starting from the chosen beginning of the orbit and use the parity of this number to determine which of these two subsets is the correct descriptor at any given time.

46.

Segment 2 does not correspond to the choice of the initial (Euler) configuration made in Sec. III E. Rather the latter corresponds to segment 3. Renumbering of particles is straightforward, but it would lead to unnecessary complications in the definition/application of the Jacobi vectors.

Supplementary Material

AAPT members receive access to the American Journal of Physics and The Physics Teacher as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.