We have developed a set of laboratories and hands on activities to accompany a new two-semester interdisciplinary physics course that has been developed and tested in two small test classes at the University of Maryland, College Park (UMD) in 2012–2013. We have designed the laboratories to be taken accompanying a reformed course in the student's second year, with calculus, biology, and chemistry as prerequisites. These prerequisites permit the laboratories to include significant content on physics relevant to cellular scales, from chemical interactions to random motion and charge screening in fluids. We also introduce students to research-grade equipment and modern physics analysis tools in contexts relevant to biology while maintaining the pedagogically valuable open-ended laboratory structure of reformed laboratories. Preliminary student response results from these two classes are discussed.
REFERENCES
1.
National Research Council
, Bio 2010: Transforming Undergraduate Education for Future Research Biologists
(Nat'l Academy Press
, 2003
).2.
3.
AAMC/HHMI, Scientific Foundations for Future Physicians: Report of the AAMC-HHMI Committee (
2009
).4.
AAAS
, Vision and Change in Undergraduate Biology Education: A Call to Action
(AAAS Press
, 2011
).5.
A. P.
French
and E. F.
Jossem
, “Teaching physics for related sciences and professions
,” Am. J. Phys.
44
, 1149
–1159
(1976
).6.
K. V.
Thompson
, J. A.
Chmielewski
, M. S.
Gaines
, C. A.
Hrycyna
, and W. R.
LaCourse
, “Competency-based Reforms of the Undergraduate Biology Curriculum: Integrating the Physical and Biological Sciences
,” Cell Biol. Educ.—Life Sci. Educ.
12
, 162
–169
(2013
).7.
E. F.
Redish
et al. “NEXUS/Physics: An interdisciplinary repurposing of physics for biologists
,” Am. J. Phys.
82
, 368
–377
(2014
).8.
E. F.
Redish
and D.
Hammer
, “Reinventing college physics for biologists: Explicating an epistemological curriculum
,” Am. J. Phys.
77
, 629
–642
(2009
).9.
J.
Watkins
, J. E.
Coffey
, E. F.
Redish
, and T. J.
Cooke
, “Disciplinary authenticity: Enriching the reform of introductory physics courses for life science students
,” Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res.
8
(1
), 010112
–1
010112
–17
(2012
).10.
E.
Barkai
, Y.
Garini
, and R.
Metzler
, “Strange kinetics of single molecules in living cells
,” Phys. Today
65
(8
), 29
–35
(2012
).11.
M. A.
Catapovic
, P. M.
Tyler
, J. G.
Trapani
, and A. R.
Carter
, “Improving the quantification of Brownian motion
,” Am. J. Phys.
81
, 485
–491
(2013
).12.
F.
Reif
and M.
St. John
, “Teaching physicists' thinking skills in the laboratory
,” Am. J. Phys.
47
(11
), 950
–957
(1979
).13.
Some published material examining interdisciplinary content shifts exists in a Cell Biology Education-Life Sciences Education special issue on Integrating Physics and Biology Education (June 2013, volume 12, no. 2), though none of these articles specifically address changes in laboratory curricula.
14.
A wiki archiving these IPLS lab materials is accessible at <http://resources.columbian.gwu.edu/iplswiki/index.php/Laboratories>. References at this site (accessed Feb. 6th, 2014) include: Haverford College's medical physics teaching labs <http://www.haverford.edu/physics-astro/course_materials/phys108b/textbook.htm#Labs>, MIT's Bioengineering Labs <http://ocw.mit.edu/OcwWeb/Biological-Engineering/index.htm>, Caltech's Physical Biology of the Cell Lab <http://www.rpgroup.caltech.edu/courses/aph162/2009/>, U. C. Berkeley's Physics Advanced Lab <http://labs.physics.berkeley.edu/mediawiki/index.php/Main_Page>, Princeton's Integrated Science Program <http://www.princeton.edu/integratedscience/>, and Mt. Holyoke College's Intro Physics Labs <http://www.mtholyoke.edu/courses/mpeterso/phys103/labs/index.html>.
15.
A good example of a large-scale reformed content curriculum is Johns Hopkins' Biological Physics Labs, <http://www.pha.jhu.edu/~wonnell/Biological_Physics_Labs_21Jul09.pdf>.
16.
UMD's Scientific Community Lab materials available at <http://umdperg.pbworks.com/w/page/10511229/Scientific%20Community%20Labs>.
17.
R.
Lippmann Kung
, “Teaching the concepts of measurement: An example of a concept-based laboratory course
,” Am. J. Phys.
73
(8
), 771
–777
(2005
).18.
Rutgers' Investigative Science Learning Environment labs can be found at <http://www.islephysics.net/>.
19.
E.
Etkina
and A.
Van Heuvelen
, “Investigative Science Learning Environment—A Science Process Approach to Learning Physics
,” in Research-Based Reform of University Physics
, edited by E. F.
Redish
and P.
Cooney
(American Association of Physics Teachers
, College Park, MD
, 2007
), pp. 1
–48
.20.
E.
Etkina
, S.
Murthy
, and X.
Zou
, “Using introductory labs to engage students in experimental design
,” Am. J. Phys.
74
(11
), 979
–986
(2006
).21.
R.
Lippmann
, “Students' understanding of measurement and uncertainty in the physics laboratory: Social construction, underlying concepts, and quantitative analysis
,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Maryland (2003
), available at <http://www.physics.umd.edu/perg/dissertations/Lippmann/>.22.
A.
Karelina
and E.
Etkina
, “When and how do students engage in sense-making in a physics lab?
,” AIP Conf. Proc.
883
, 93
–96
(2007
).23.
A.
Karelina
et al. “Design and non-design labs: does transfer occur?
,” AIP Conf. Proc.
951
, 92
–95
(2007
).24.
E.
Etkina
and S.
Murthy
, “Design labs: Students' expectations and reality
,” AIP Conf. Proc.
818
, 97
–100
(2006
).25.
N. J.
Nersessian
, “Mental Modeling in conceptual change
,” in International Handbook of Research on Conceptual Change
, edited by S.
Vosniadou
(Routledge
, New York, NY
, 2008
), pp. 391
–416
.26.
D.
Hestenes
, “Toward a modeling theory of physics instruction
,” Am. J. Phys.
55
(5
), 440
–454
(1987
).27.
E.
Etkina
, A.
Warren
, and M.
Gentile
, “The role of models in physics instruction
,” Phys. Teach.
44
, 34
–39
(2006
).28.
E.
Brewe
, “Modeling theory applied: Modeling Instruction in introductory physics
,” Am. J. Phys.
76
, 1155
–1160
(2008
).29.
I.
Halloun
, “Schematic Modeling for meaningful learning of physics
,” J. Res. Sci. Teach.
33
(9
), 1019
–1041
(1996
).30.
NSF Directorate for EHR Review of Undergraduate Education, Shaping the future: New expectations for undergraduate education in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology (May
1996
).31.
See supplementary material at http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.4870388 for a description of all lab activities. Curricular materials for the NEXUS/Physics labs are available at <http://www.nexusphysics.umd.edu> by following the “NEXUS/Physics Labs, 2013–2014” link.
32.
Since random (and diffusive) motion is described by r2 proportional to t, this logarithmic plot will have a slope of 1. Directed motion, where r is proportional to t, and thus r2 is proportional to t2, will have a log(r2) vs. log(t) plot with a slope of 2. Confined (trapped) motion, which is sub-diffusive, will have a slope less than 1.
33.
E. F.
Redish
, J. M.
Saul
, and R. N.
Steinberg
, “Student Expectations in introductory physics
,” Am. J. Phys.
66
(3
), 212
–224
(1998
).34.
A.
Schoenfeld
, “Learning to Think Mathematically: Problem Solving, Metacognition, and Sense-Making in Mathematics
,” in Handbook of Research in Mathematics Teaching and Learning
, edited by D. A.
Grouws
(MacMillan
, New York, NY
, 1992
), pp. 334
–370
.35.
M. R.
Villasenor
and E.
Etkina
, “Reformed physics instruction through the eyes of students
,” AIP Conf. Proc.
883
, 105
–108
(2007
).© 2014 American Association of Physics Teachers.
2014
American Association of Physics Teachers
AAPT members receive access to the American Journal of Physics and The Physics Teacher as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.
