All teachers and students of physics have absorbed the doctrine that probability must be normalized. Nevertheless, there are problems for which the normalization factor only gets in the way. An important example of this counter-intuitive assertion is provided by the derivation of the thermodynamic entropy from the principles of statistical mechanics. Unnormalized probabilities provide a surprisingly effective teaching tool that can make it easier to explain to students the essential concept of entropy. The elimination of the normalization factor offers simpler equations for thermodynamic equilibrium in statistical mechanics, which then lead naturally to a new and simpler definition of the entropy in thermodynamics. Notably, this definition does not change the formal expression of the entropy based on composite systems that I have previously offered. My previous definition of entropy has been criticized by Dieks, based on what appears to be a misinterpretation. I believe that the new definition presented here has the advantage of greatly reducing the possibility of such a misunderstanding—either by students or by experts.

1.
R. H.
Swendsen
, “
Statistical mechanics of colloids and Boltzmann's definition of the entropy
,”
Am. J. Phys.
74
,
187
190
(
2006
).
2.
L.
Boltzmann
, “
Über die Beziehung zwischen dem zweiten Hauptsatze der mechanischen Wärmetheorie und der Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung respektive den Sätzen über das Wärmegleichgewicht
,”
Wien. Ber.
76
,
373
435
(
1877
),
reprinted in
Wissenschaftliche Abhandlungen von Ludwig Boltzmann
(
Chelsea
,
New York
,
1968
), Vol.
II
, pp.
164
223
.
3.
R. H.
Swendsen
, “
Statistical mechanics of classical systems with distinguishable particles
,”
J. Stat. Phys.
107
,
1143
1165
(
2002
).
4.
R. H.
Swendsen
, “
Choosing a definition of entropy that works
,”
Found. Phys.
42
,
582
593
(
2012
).
5.
R. H.
Swendsen
,
An Introduction to Statistical Mechanics and Thermodynamics
(
Oxford
,
London
,
2012
).
6.
I'll limit the discussion to systems with a single type of particle. Although it is straightforward to extend the formalism to many types of particles, it is not essential to the main argument and would only complicate the notation.
7.

Some students, and even some professors, accept Eq. (1) for states that are not particle exchange symmetric but not for states that are. It is true for both.

8.
M.
Planck
, “
Über das Gesetz der Energieverteilung im Normalspektrum
,”
Drudes Ann.
553
562
(
1901
), reprinted in Ostwalds Klassiker der exakten Wissenschaften, Band 206, “Die Ableitung der Strahlungsgesteze,” pp. 65–74.
9.
M.
Planck
,
Theorie der Wärmestrahlung
(
J. A. Barth
,
Leipzig
,
1906
),
translated into English by Morton Masius in
M.
Planck
,
The Theory of Heat Radiation
(
Dover
,
New York
,
1991
), p.
119
.
10.

There is a subtlety involved in applying Eq. (19) because the spectra of the primed and unprimed systems do not generally allow arbitrary changes in E and E when the sum ET=E+E is held constant. This mathematical difficulty is most commonly dealt with by letting one of the systems become infinitely large and using it to define the canonical ensemble.5 

11.
N. G.
van Kampen
, “
The Gibbs paradox
,” in
Essays in Theoretical Physics
, edited by
W. E.
Parry
(
Pergamon
,
Oxford
,
1984
).
12.
D.
Dieks
, “
Is There a Unique Physical Entropy? Micro versus Macro
,” in
New Challenges to Philosophy of Science
(The Philosophy of Science in a European Perspective), edited by
H.
Andersen
,
D.
Dieks
,
W.
Gonzalez
,
T.
Uebel
, and
G.
Wheeler
(
Springer
,
New York
,
2013
).
13.
M. A. M.
Versteegh
and
D.
Dieks
, “
The Gibbs paradox and the distinguishability of identical particles
,”
Am. J. Phys.
79
,
741
746
(
2011
).
14.
R. H.
Swendsen
, “
How physicists disagree on the meaning of entropy
,”
Am. J. Phys.
79
,
342
348
(
2011
).
AAPT members receive access to the American Journal of Physics and The Physics Teacher as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.