We measured the time taken by students to respond to individual Force Concept Inventory (FCI) questions. We examine response time differences between correct and incorrect answers, both before and after instruction. We also determine the relation between response time and expressed confidence. Our data reveal three results of interest. First, response times are longer for incorrect answers than for correct ones, indicating that distractors are not automatic choices. Second, response times increase after instruction for both correct and incorrect answers, supporting the notion that instruction changes students' approach to conceptual questions. Third, response times are inversely related to students' expressed confidence; the lower their confidence, the longer it takes to respond.
Skip Nav Destination
,
,
,
Article navigation
September 2013
PAPERS|
September 01 2013
Response times to conceptual questions
Nathaniel Lasry;
Nathaniel Lasry
Physics Department, John Abbott College
, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
H9X 3L9
Search for other works by this author on:
Jessica Watkins;
Jessica Watkins
a)
School of Engineering and Applied Sciences,
Harvard University
, 9 Oxford Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138 and Department of Physics, Harvard University
, 9 Oxford Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138
Search for other works by this author on:
Eric Mazur;
Eric Mazur
School of Engineering and Applied Sciences,
Harvard University
, 9 Oxford Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138 and Department of Physics, Harvard University
, 9 Oxford Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138
Search for other works by this author on:
Ahmed Ibrahim
Ahmed Ibrahim
Faculty of Education,
McGill University
, 3700 McTavish Street, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
H3A 1Y2
Search for other works by this author on:
Nathaniel Lasry
Jessica Watkins
a)
Eric Mazur
Ahmed Ibrahim
Physics Department, John Abbott College
, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
H9X 3L9a)
Present address: Department of Education and Center for Engineering Education and Outreach, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts 02155
Am. J. Phys. 81, 703–706 (2013)
Article history
Received:
December 06 2011
Accepted:
June 14 2013
Citation
Nathaniel Lasry, Jessica Watkins, Eric Mazur, Ahmed Ibrahim; Response times to conceptual questions. Am. J. Phys. 1 September 2013; 81 (9): 703–706. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.4812583
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
All objects and some questions
Charles H. Lineweaver, Vihan M. Patel
Temperature as joules per bit
Charles Alexandre Bédard, Sophie Berthelette, et al.
Ergodic Lagrangian dynamics in a superhero universe
I. L. Tregillis, George R. R. Martin
Internal ballistics of the sling
Mark Denny
The right way to introduce complex numbers in damped harmonic oscillators
Jason Tran, Leanne Doughty, et al.
A first encounter with exceptional points in a quantum model
C. A. Downing, V. A. Saroka
Related Content
Resources-oriented instruction: What does it mean, and what might it look like?
Am. J. Phys. (July 2022)
Using Conceptual Scaffolding to Foster Effective Problem Solving
AIP Conf. Proc. (November 2009)
Graduate quantum mechanics reform
Am. J. Phys. (April 2009)
Using a High-Speed Camera to Measure the Speed of Sound
Phys. Teach. (January 2012)
Developing peer instruction questions for quantitative problems for an upper-division astronomy course
Am. J. Phys. (March 2020)