In recent years, a number of states have enacted initiatives to close undergraduate departments with low graduation rates. In response, the American Association of Physics Teachers and the American Physical Society have presented workshops to help interested programs increase graduation rates. One program asked to present at these workshops was the University of Arkansas at Fayetteville. As a result of a number of initiatives, the University of Arkansas Physics Department has seen an increase from an average of 1 to 2 graduates per year in the mid-1990s to 27 graduates in 2012. This growth resulted from many changes: a revision of the introductory physics course sequence, a reworking of degree requirements to allow increased flexibility, an increased focus on in-department academic advising, and specific faculty hires to support the educational mission. The purpose of this paper is to explore the details of the revised program.

1.
President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, “Engage to excel: Producing one million additional college graduates with degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathermatics” (
2012
), <http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/pcast-engage-to-excel-final-2-25-12.pdf>.
2.
A. P.
Carnevale
,
N.
Smith
, and
J.
Strohl
,
Help Wanted: Projections of Jobs and Education Requirements Through 2012
(
Georgetown University—Center on Education and the Workforce
,
Alexandria, Virginia
,
2010
).
3.
Committee on Prospering in the Global Economy of the 21st Century
,
Rising Above the Gathering storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter Economic Future
(
National Academies Press
,
Washington
, DC,
2007
).
4.
National Governors Association, “Building a science, technology, engineering, and math education agenda” (
2011
), <http://www.nga.org/files/live/sites/NGA/files/pdf/1112STEMGUIDE.PDF>.
5.
P. J.
Mulvey
and
S.
Nicholson
, “
Focus on Physics Bachelor's Degrees: Results from the 2010 Survey of Enrollments and Degrees
,” AIP Statistical Research Center (
2012
), <http://www.aip.org/statistics/trends/reports/physbach0910.pdf>.
6.
T.
Hodapp
, “
The economics of education: Closing undergraduate physics programs
,”
APS News
20
,
8
(
2011
), <http://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/201112/upload/december2011.pdf>.
7.
American Association of Physics Teachers, “
Spin-up workshop archive
” (
2012
), <http://www.aapt.org/Programs/projects/spinup/spinuparchives.cfm>.
8.
American Physical Society
, “
PhysTEC prepares future physics teachers
,”
APS Capitol Hill Quarterly
3
,
1
3
(
2008
), <http://www.aps.org/publications/capitolhillquarterly/200809/upload/200809.pdf>.
9.
K. S.
Krane
, “
Help Wanted: What physics departments have done, can do, and should do to increase student enrollment and better prepare physics majors for the workforce
,”
Interactions
37
,
48
51
(
2007
).
10.
T.
Hodapp
,
J.
Hehn
, and
W.
Hein
, “
Preparing high school physics teachers
,”
Phys. Today
62
(
2
),
40
45
(
2009
).
11.
R. C.
Hilborn
,
R. H.
Howes
, and
K. S.
Krane
, “
Strategic programs for innovations in undergraduate physics: Project report
” (
2003
), <http://www.aps.org/programs/education/undergrad/faculty/spinup/upload/SPIN-UP-Report.pdf>.
12.
D. E.
Meltzer
,
M.
Plisch
, and
S.
Vokos
, editors,
Transforming the Preparation of Physic Teachers: A Call to Action. A Report by the Task Force on Teachers Education in Physics (T-TEP)
(
American Physics Society
,
College Park, MD
,
2012
), <http://www.ptec.org/webdocs/TaskForce.cfm>.
13.
V.
Otero
,
S.
Pollock
, and
N.
Finkelstein
, “
A physics department's role in preparing physics teachers: The Colorado learning assistant model
,”
Am. J. Phys.
78
,
1218
1224
(
2010
).
AAPT members receive access to the American Journal of Physics and The Physics Teacher as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.