In the early 1830s, Michael Faraday performed his seminal experimental research on electromagnetic induction, in which he created the first electric dynamo—a machine for continuously converting rotational mechanical energy into electrical energy. His machine was a conducting disc, rotating between the poles of a permanent magnet, with the voltage/current obtained from brushes contacting the disc. In his first dynamo, the magnetic field was asymmetric with respect to the axis of the disc. This is to be contrasted with some of his later symmetric designs, which are the ones almost invariably discussed in textbooks on electromagnetism. In this paper, a theoretical analysis is developed for Faraday's first dynamo. From this analysis, the eddy currents in the disc and the open-circuit voltage for arbitrary positioning of the brushes are determined. The approximate analysis is verified by comparing theoretical results with measurements made on an experimental recreation of the dynamo. Quantitative results from the analysis are used to elucidate Faraday's qualitative observations, from which he learned so much about electromagnetic induction. For the asymmetric design, the eddy currents in the disc dissipate energy that makes the dynamo inefficient, prohibiting its use as a practical generator of electric power. Faraday's experiments with his first dynamo provided valuable insight into electromagnetic induction, and this insight was quickly used by others to design practical generators.
REFERENCES
1.
M.
Arago
, “L'action que les corps aimantés et ceux qui ne le sont pas exercent les uns sur les autres
,” Ann. Chim. Phys.
28
, 325
(1825
); andM.
Arago
, “Note concernant les phénomènes magnétiques auxquels le mouvement donne naissance
,” Ann. Chim. Phys.
32
, 213
–223
(1826
).An account in English is in
C.
Babbage
and J. F. W.
Herschel
, “Account of the repetition of M. Arago's experiments on magnetism manifested by various substances during the act of rotation
,” Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. London
115
, 467
–496
(1825
).2.
M.
Faraday
, Experimental Researches in Electricity
, Vol. I (Taylor and Francis
, London
, 1839
; Republication, Green Lion, Santa Fe, NM, 2000), Paragraph 83, pg. 25.3.
M.
Faraday
, Faraday's Diary
, edited by T.
Martin
(G. Bell and Sons
, London
, 1932
), Vol. I, Paragraphs 99–136, pp. 381
–386
.4.
M.
Faraday
, Experimental Researches in Electricity
(Taylor and Francis
, London
, 1839
), Vol. I, Paragraphs 83–100, pp. 25
–29
; and 119–134, pp. 34–39.5.
S. P.
Thompson
, Michael Faraday, His Life and Work
(Cassell
, London
, 1901
; Republication, Elibron Classics, New York, 2004), pg. 123.
6.
M.
Faraday
, Faraday's Diary
, edited by T.
Martin
(G. Bell and Sons
, London
, 1932
), Vol. I, Paragraph 228, pg. 397
.7.
M.
Faraday
, Experimental Researches in Electricity
(Taylor and Francis
, London
, 1839
), Vol. I, Paragraph 155, p. 46
.8.
R. J.
Stephenson
, “Experiments with a unipolar generator and motor
,” Am. J. Phys.
5
, 108
–110
(1937
).9.
J. W.
Then
, “Laboratory experiments in motional electric fields
,” Am. J. Phys.
28
, 557
–559
(1960
).10.
J. W.
Then
, “Experimental study of the motional electromotive force
,” Am. J. Phys.
30
, 411
–415
(1962
).11.
M. J.
Crooks
, D. B.
Litvin
, P. W.
Matthews
, R.
Macaulay
, and J.
Shaw
, “One-piece Faraday generator: A paradoxical experiment from 1851
,” Am. J. Phys.
46
, 729
–731
(1978
).12.
R. D.
Eagleton
, “Two laboratory experiments involving the homopolar generator
,” Am. J. Phys.
55
, 621
–623
(1987
).13.
H. H.
Woodson
and J. R.
Melcher
, Electromechanical Dynamics, Part I: Discreet Systems
(Wiley
, New York
, 1968
), pp. 286
–289
.14.
J.
Van Bladel
, Relativity and Engineering
(Springer-Verlag
, Berlin
, 1984
), pp. 283
–291
.15.
J.
Van Bladel
, “Relativistic theory of rotating disks
,” Proc. IEEE
61
, 260
–268
(1973
).16.
H.
Montgomery
, “Current flow patterns in a Faraday disc
,” Eur. J. Phys.
25
, 171
–183
(2004
).17.
18.
W. R.
Smythe
, Static and Dynamic Electricity
, 3rd ed. (McGraw-Hill
, New York
, 1968
), pp. 390
–393
.19.
This type of problem is sometimes referred to as a “quasi-static magnetic field system,” and it is discussed in detail in
H. H.
Woodson
and J. R.
Melcher
, Electromechanical Dynamics, Part I: Discreet Systems
(Wiley
, New York
, 1968
), pp. 6
–8
, 260–264, 270–277, 284–289, B19–B25.20.
In the local rest frame for a point on the disc, the thickness of the disc is assumed to be much less than the skin depth in the conductor. In this frame, the volume current density is then practically uniform throughout the thickness of the disc. In the quasi-static approximation, the volume current density is the same in the moving frame and in the laboratory frame; hence, it is practically uniform in the laboratory frame.
21.
A. I.
Borisenko
and I. E.
Tarapov
, Vector and Tensor Analysis with Applications, translated by R. A. Silverman
(Prentice-Hall
, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
, 1968
), pp. 211
–223
.22.
Smythe solves for the stream function U, which is simply related to the magnetic scalar potential: . His method is briefly as follows. First, he considers a pole placed over an infinite conducting sheet. The radius of the pole is a, and it is offset from the origin by c. He obtains an integral for the stream function U1 of this pole, and he evaluates this integral approximately. Next, he introduces a second pole with the same total flux as the first pole but of opposite sign, and he obtains the approximate stream function U2 for this pole. The radius and offset from the origin for the second pole are and , with . Finally, he adjusts and to make the superposition U = U1 + U2 satisfy the boundary condition U = 0 at the radius ρ = A (edge of the disc).
23.
Normally a tube of current is a region of three-dimensional space delineated by a side surface that is everywhere parallel to the direction of the volume current density . The total current I passing through any cross-sectional area of the tube is the same—think of a pipe with the water flowing through the pipe representing the current. Here, we are using the two-dimensional version of the tube of current. The current is on a surface (on the disc) and the sides of the tube are two lines that are everywhere parallel to the direction of the surface current density . The total current I passing through any cross-sectional contour joining these lines is the same.
24.
H.
Gelman
, “Faraday's law for relativistic and deformed motion of a circuit
,” Eur. J. Phys.
12
, 230
–233
(1991
).25.
I. S.
Gradshteyn
and I. M.
Ryzhik
, Tables of Integrals, Series, and Products
, 7th ed. (Academic
, New York
, 2007
).26.
The deflection of the galvanometer is a function of the current through it. If the internal resistance of the disc is always small compared to the resistance of the external circuit, this current exhibits the same proportionality to the open-circuit voltage for all positions of the brush ().
27.
This equivalence is based on equating the area for a circular pole to that for the square or rectangular pole.
28.
M.
Faraday
, Experimental Researches in Electricity
(Taylor and Francis
, London
, 1839
), Vol. I, Paragraph 90, p. 27
.29.
30.
W. M.
Saslow
, “Maxwell's theory of eddy currents in thin conducting sheets, and applications to electromagnetic shielding and MAGLEV
,” Am. J. Phys.
60
, 693
–711
(1992
).31.
D. A.
Watt
, “The development and operation of a 10-kW homopolar generator with mercury brushes
,” Proc. IEE (London)
105A
, 233
–240
(1958
).32.
A. I.
Miller
, “Essay 3: Unipolar Induction: a Case Study of the Interaction between Science and Technology
,” in A. I. Miller, Frontiers of Physics: 1900–1911: Selected Essays
(Birkhäuser
, Boston
, 1986
), pp. 153
–187
.33.
A.
Mochizuki
, “A new series of the Shinkansen EMU train made its debut
,” Jpn. Railw. Eng.
25
, 6
–11
(1985
).34.
H. D.
Wiederick
, N.
Gauthier
, D. A.
Campbell
, and P.
Rochon
, “Magnetic braking: Simple theory and experiment
,” Am. J. Phys.
55
, 500
–503
(1987
).35.
M. A.
Heald
, “Magnetic braking: improved theory
,” Am. J. Phys.
56
, 521
–522
(1988
).36.
M.
Marcuso
, R.
Gass
, D.
Jones
, and C.
Rowlett
, “Magnetic drag in the quasi-static limit: Experimental data and analysis
,” Am. J. Phys.
59
, 1123
–1129
(1991
).37.
J. M.
Aguirregabiria
, A.
Hernández
, and M.
Rivas
, “Magnetic braking revisited
,” Am. J. Phys.
65
, 851
–856
(1997
).38.
J.
Schykowski
, “Eddy-current braking: A long road to success,” http:/www.railwaygazette.com/news/single-view/view/eddy-current-braking-a-long-road-to-success.html (2008
).39.
S. P.
Thompson
, Polyphase Electric Currents and Alternate-Current Motors
, 2nd ed. (Spon and Chamberlain
, New York
, 1900
), pp. 421
–471
.© 2013 American Association of Physics Teachers.
2013
American Association of Physics Teachers
AAPT members receive access to the American Journal of Physics and The Physics Teacher as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.
