Understanding and interpreting graphs are essential skills in all sciences. While students are mostly proficient in plotting given functions and reading values off graphs, they frequently lack the ability to construct and interpret graphs in a meaningful way. Students can use graphs as representations of value pairs, but often fail to interpret them as the representation of functions, and mostly fail to use them as representations of physical reality. Working with graphs in classroom settings has been shown to improve student abilities with graphs, particularly when the students can interact with them. We introduce a novel problem type in an online homework system, which requires students to construct the graphs themselves in free form, and requires no hand-grading by instructors. Initial experiences using the new problem type in an introductory physics course are reported.

1.
A. V.
Heuvelen
, “
Learning to think like a physicist: A review of research-based instructional strategies
,”
Am. J. Phys.
59
,
891
897
(
1991
).
2.
L.
McDermott
,
M. L.
Rosenquist
, and
E. H.
van Zee
, “
Student difficulties in connecting graphs and physics: Examples from kinematics
,”
Am. J. Phys.
55
,
503
513
(
1987
).
3.
D. E.
Meltzer
, “
Relation between students’ problem-solving performance and representational format
,”
Am. J. Phys.
73
,
463
478
(
2005
).
4.
H.
Lin
, “
Learning physics vs. passing courses
,”
Phys. Teach.
20
,
151
157
(
1982
).
5.
G.
Leinhardt
,
O.
Zaslavsky
, and
M. K.
Stein
, “
Functions, graphs, and graphing: Tasks, learning, and teaching
,”
Rev. Educ. Res.
60
,
1
64
(
1990
).
6.
J.
Clement
,
J.
Lochhead
, and
G. S.
Monk
, “
Translation difficulties in learning mathematics
,”
Am. Math. Monthly
88
,
286
290
(
1981
).
7.
R. N.
Steinberg
,
M. C.
Wittmann
, and
E. F.
Redish
, “
Mathematical Tutorials in Introductory Physics
,” in
The Changing Role of Physics Departments in Modern Universities
, edited by
E. F.
Redish
and
J.
Ridgen
(
AIP
, Woodbury, NY,
1997
), pp.
1075
1092
.
8.
R. J.
Beichner
, “
Testing student interpretation of kinematics graphs
,”
Am. J. Phys.
62
,
750
762
(
1994
).
9.
D. I.
Dykstra
and
D. R.
Sweet
, “
Conceptual development about motion and force in elementary and middle school students
,”
Am. J. Phys.
77
,
468
476
(
2009
).
10.
J.
Bertin
,
La semiologie graphique
(
Mouton-Gautier
,
The Hague, The Netherlands
,
1973
).
11.
F. R.
Curcio
, “
Comprehension of mathematical relationships expressed in graphs
,”
J. Res. Math. Educ.
18
,
382
385
(
1987
).
12.
C. C.
McKnight
, “
Critical Evaluation of Quantitative Arguments
,” in
Assessing Higher Order Thinking in Mathematics
, edited by
G.
Kulm
(
American Association for the Advancement of Science
,
Washington, DC
,
1990
), pp.
169
185
.
13.
H.
Wainer
, “
Understanding graphs and tables
,”
Educ. Res.
21
,
14
23
(
1992
).
14.
C. M.
Carswell
, “
Choosing specifiers: An evaluation of the basic tasks model of graphical perception
,”
Hum. Factors
34
,
535
554
(
1992
).
15.
S. N.
Friel
,
F. R.
Curcio
, and
G. W.
Bright
, “
Making sense of graphs: Critical factors influencing comprehension and instructional implications
,”
J. Res. Math. Educ.
32
,
124
158
(
2001
).
16.
H.
Wainer
, “
A test of graphicacy in children
,”
Appl. Psychol. Meas.
4
,
331
340
(
1980
).
17.
I. S.
Araujo
,
E. A.
Veit
, and
M. A.
Moreira
, “
Physics students’ performance using computational modeling activities to improves kinematics graphs interpretation
,”
Comput. Educ.
50
,
1128
1140
(
2008
).
18.
P.
Hale
, “
Kinematics and graphs: Students’ difficulties and CBLs
,”
Math. Teacher
93
,
414
417
(
2000
).
19.
J. R.
Mokros
and
R. F.
Tinker
, “
The impact of microcomputer-based labs on children’s ability to interpret graphs
,”
J. Res. Sci. Teach.
24
,
369
383
(
1987
).
20.
R. K.
Thornton
and
D. R.
Sokoloff
, “
Learning motion concepts using real-time microcomputer-based laboratory tools
,”
Am. J. Phys.
58
,
858
867
(
1989
).
21.
M.
Svec
, “
Improving graphing interpretation skills and understanding of motion using micro-computer based laboratories
,”
Electron. J. Sci. Educ.
3
, (
1999
).
22.
I.
Testa
,
G.
Monroy
, and
E.
Sassi
, “
Students’ reading images in kinematics: The case of real-time graphs
,”
Int. J. Sci. Educ.
24
,
235
256
(
2002
).
23.
D. W.
Russell
,
K. B.
Lucas
, and
C. J.
McRobbie
, “
The role of the microcomputer-based laboratory display in supporting the construction of new understandings in kinematics
,”
Res. Sci. Educ.
33
,
217
243
(
2003
).
24.
H.
Brasell
, “
The effect of real-time laboratory graphing on learning graphic representations of distance and velocity
,”
J. Res. Sci. Teach.
24
,
385
395
(
1987
).
25.
R. J.
Beichner
, “
The effect of simultaneous motion presentation and graph generation in a kinematics lab
,”
J. Res. Sci. Teach.
27
,
803
815
(
1990
).
26.
J. B.
Brungardt
and
D.
Zollman
, “
Influence of interactive videodisc instruction using simultaneous-time analysis on kinematics graphing skills of high school physics students
,”
J. Res. Sci. Teach.
32
,
855
869
(
1995
).
27.
D. D.
Adams
and
J. W.
Shrum
, “
The effects of microcomputer-based laboratory exercises on the acquisition of line graph construction and interpretation skills by high school biology students
,”
J. Res. Sci. Teach.
27
,
777
787
(
1990
).
28.
R.
Mitnik
,
M.
Recabarren
,
M.
Nussbaum
, and
A.
Soto
, “
Collaborative robotic instruction: A graph teaching experience
,”
Comput. Educ.
53
,
330
342
(
2009
).
29.
Homepage of the PADs project, <http://www.wku.edu/pads/>.
30.
S.
Bonham
, “
Graphical response exercises for teaching physics
,”
Phys. Teach.
45
,
482
486
(
2007
).
31.
Homepage of Maplesoft’s MapleTA system, <http://www.maplesoft.com/products/mapleta/>.
32.
Homepage of Pearson’s MasteringPhysics system, <http://www.masteringphysics.com/>.
33.
Homepage of the BeSocratic project by
M.
Klymkowsky
,
M.
Cooper
, and
S.
Bryfcynski
, <http://besocratic.clemson.edu/>.
34.
Homepage of the WebAssign system, <http://www.webassign.net/>.
35.
Homepage of Pearson’s MyMathLab system, <http://www.mymathlab.com/>.
36.
Homepage of the GeoGebra project, <http://www.geogebra.org/>.
37.
J.
Hohenwarter
,
M.
Hohenwarter
, and
Z.
Lavicza
, “
Introducing dynamic mathematics software to secondary school teachers: The case of GeoGebra
,”
J. Comput. Math. Sci. Teach.
28
,
135
146
(
2009
).
38.
Awards won by the GeoGebra project, <http://www.geogebra.org/cms/en/info>.
39.
Homepage of the GeoGebra Mobile project, <http://www.geogebra.org/trac/wiki/GeoGebraMobile>.
40.
Homepage of the LON-CAPA project, <http://www.lon-capa.org/>.
41.
D. A.
Kashy
,
G.
Albertelli
,
G.
Ashkenazi
,
E.
Kashy
,
H.-K.
Ng
, and
M.
Thoennessen
, “
Individualized interactive exercises: A promising role for network technology
,” in
Proc. Frontiers in Education
, (
IEEE/ASEE
, Reno, NV,
2001
), pp.
1073
1078
.
42.
G.
Kortemeyer
,
E.
Kashy
,
W.
Benenson
, and
W.
Bauer
, “
Experiences using the open-source learning content management and assessment system LON-CAPA in introductory physics courses
,”
Am. J. Phys.
76
,
438
444
(
2008
).
43.
Listing of LON-CAPA user institution statistics, <http://www.lon-capa.org/institutions.html>.
44.
Listing of LON-CAPA resource pool statistics, <http://www.lon-capa.org/sharedpool.html>.
45.
G.
Kortemeyer
, “
Gender differences in the use of an online homework system in an introductory physics course
,”
Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res.
5
,
010107
(
2009
).
46.
G.
Kortemeyer
, “
An analysis of asynchronous online homework discussions in introductory physics courses
,”
Am. J. Phys.
74
,
526
536
(
2005
).
47.
E.
Silver
, “
Fostering creativity through instruction rich in mathematical problem solving and problem posing
,”
Zentralblatt fu¨r Didaktik der Mathematik
29
,
75
80
(
1997
).
48.
A.
Pascarella
, “
The influence of web-based homework on quantitative problem-solving in a university physics class
,” in
Proceedings of the NARST Annual Meeting
,
Vancouver
,
BC, Canada
,
2004
, <http://www.lon-capa.org/papers/204416ProceedingsPaper.pdf>.
49.
See the supplementary material at http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.4719112 for a detailed comparison of these graph construction systems and more detailed description of the editing process and XML source code.

Supplementary Material

AAPT members receive access to the American Journal of Physics and The Physics Teacher as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.