The gyromagnetic relation—that is, the proportionality between the angular momentum and the magnetization —is evidence of the intimate connections between the magnetic properties and the inertial properties of ferromagnetic bodies. However, inertia is absent from the dynamics of a magnetic dipole: The Landau–Lifshitz equation, the Gilbert equation, and the Bloch equation contain only the first derivative of the magnetization with respect to time. In order to investigate this paradoxical situation, the Lagrangian approach, proposed originally by Gilbert, is revisited keeping an arbitrary nonzero inertia tensor. The corresponding physical picture is a generalization to three dimensions of Ampère’s hypothesis of molecular currents. A dynamic equation generalized to the inertial regime is obtained. It is shown how both the usual gyromagnetic relation and the well-known Landau–Lifshitz–Gilbert equation are recovered in the kinetic limit, that is, for time scales longer than the relaxation time of the angular momentum.
REFERENCES
1.
R.
Feynman
, R.
Leighton
, and M.
Sands
, The Feynman Lectures on Physics
(CIT
, 1963
), Vol. I
, 20.6–7 for the description of the gyroscope and Vol. II 34–2 to 34–5 for the magnetic precession.2.
J.
Stöhr
and H. C.
Siegmann
, Magnetism: From Fundamental to Nanoscale Dynamics
(Springer
, Berlin
, 2006
).3.
This is not the case for non-uniform magnetization (domain walls or antiferromagnets), for which a magnetic mass is defined. See the pioneering work of
W.
Döring
: “Uber die trägheit der Wände zwischen Weisschen Bezirken
” (On the inertia of walls between Weiss domains), Z. Naturforsch.
3a
, 373
–379
(1948
). Döring introduced the magnetic Lagrangian in this paper.4.
M.-C.
Ciornei
, J. M.
Rubí
, and J.-E.
Wegrowe
, “Magnetization dynamics in the inertial regime: Nutation predicted at short time scales
,” Phys. Rev. B
83
, 020410
–R
1
–4
(2011
).5.
Fähnle
, D.
Steiauf
, and Ch.
Illg
, “Generalized Gilbert equation including inertial damping: Derivation from an extended breathing Fermi surface model
,” Phys. Rev. B
84
, 172403
(2011
).6.
L. P.
Williams
, “Why Ampère did not discover electromagnetic induction
,” Am. J. Phys.
54
, 306
–311
(1986
).7.
The gyromagnetic relation has been established through static magnetomechanical measurements. See
S. J.
Barnett
, “Gyromagnetic and electron-inertia effects
,” Rev. Mod. Phys.
7
, 129
–167
(1935
); and
A.
Einstein
and W. J.
de Haas
, “Experimenteller Nachweis der Ampereschen Molekularströme
,” Verhandl. Dtsch. Phys. Ges.
17
, 152
–170
(1915
).8.
V. Ya.
Frenkel’
“On the history of the Einstein-de Haas effect
,” Sov. Phys. Usp.
22
, 580
–587
(1979
).9.
P.
Galison
, How Experiments End
(The University of Chicago Press
, Chicago
, 1987
), Chapter 2.10.
H. C.
Ohanian
, “What is spin?
,” Am. J. Phys.
54
, 500
–505
(1986
).11.
L.
Landau
and E.
Lifshitz
, “On the theory of dispersion of magnetic permeability in ferromagnetic bodies
,” Phys. Z. Sowjetunion
8
, 153
–169
(1935
).12.
N.
Bloembergen
, “On the ferromagnetic resonance in Nickel and supermalloy
,” Phys. Rev.
78
, 572
–580
(1950
).13.
T. L.
Gilbert
, “Formulation, foundations and applications of the phenomenological theory of ferromagnetism
,” Ph.D. dissertation, Illinois Institute of Technology
, 1956
, Appendix B.14.
T. L.
Gilbert
, “A phenomenological theory of damping in ferromagnetic materials
,” IEEE Trans. Mag.
40
, 3443
–3449
(2004
). The discussion related to the assumption is confined in footnotes 7 and 8. Note that the original reference in Physical Review is only an abstract:T. L.
Gilbert
, “A Lagrangian formulation of the gyromagnetic equation of the magnetization fields
,” Phys. Rev.
100
, 1243
(1955
).15.
J.
Miltat
, G.
Alburquerque
, and A.
Thiaville
, “An Introduction to Micromagnetics in the Dynamics Regime
,” in Spin dynamics in confined magnetic structures I
, edited by B.
Hillebrands
and K.
Ounadjela
(Springer
, Berlin
, 2002
). The kinetic energy is introduced through the Lagrangian on page 19, Eq. (37). The Lagrangian is such that (with our notation) and .16.
W. F.
Brown
Jr., “Single-domain particles: New uses of old theorems
,” Am. J. Phys.
28
, 542
–551
(1960
). See page 549.17.
A. H.
Morrish
, The Physical Principles of Magnetism
(John Wiley & Sons
, New York
, 1965
; reprinted by IEEE Press, New York, 2001). See end of page 551.18.
T. F.
Ricci
and C.
Scherer
, “A stochastic model for the dynamics of classical spin
,” J. Stat. Phys.
67
, 1201
–1208
(1992
), page 1204: “In order to simulate the behavior of a classical spin, we take, for these equations, the limit , , and , but maintaining finite.” In our notation .19.
J. M.
Rubí
and A.
Pérez-Madrid
, “Inertial effects in non-equilibrium thermodynamics
,” Physica A
264
, 492
–502
(1999
).20.
21.
D. W.
Condiff
and J. S.
Dahler
, “Brownian motion of polyatomic molecules: The coupling of rotational and translational motions
,” J. Chem. Phys.
44
, 3988
–4005
(1966
).22.
J.-E.
Wegrowe
, “Spin transfer from the point of view of the ferromagnetic degrees of freedom
,” Solid State Commun.
150
, 519
–523
(2010
).23.
The full calculation with gives the same result. It is consistent with that found with a different approach in
M.-C.
Ciornei
et al., “Magnetization dynamics in the inertial regime: Nutation predicted at short time scales
,” Phys. Rev. B
83
, 020410
–R
(2011
).© 2012 American Association of Physics Teachers.
2012
American Association of Physics Teachers
AAPT members receive access to the American Journal of Physics and The Physics Teacher as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.
