Instructors in transformed educational environments face an increased demand to anticipate, engage with, and build upon student ideas in the classroom. Consequently, there is a need to augment traditional forms of preparation to accommodate the expanding role of instructors in these environments. We document a model of weekly preparation designed to engage graduate teaching assistants (TAs) and undergraduate learning assistants (LAs) in developing broader teaching skills through the weekly discussion of student difficulties. In this paper, we describe this model and present evidence of success at focusing instructor attention on student difficulties, accomplished within existing institutional structures and without adding significantly to instructor preparation time.

1.
R. M.
Goertzen
 et al, “
Accounting for tutorial teaching assistants’ buy-in to reform instruction
,”
Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res.
5
,
020109
(
2009
).
2.
R. M.
Goertzen
 et al, “
Tutorial teaching assistants in the classroom: Similar teaching behaviors are supported by varied beliefs about teaching and learning
,”
Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res.
6
,
010105
(
2010
).
3.
E. F.
Redish
,
Teaching Physics with the Physics Suite
(
Wiley
,
Hoboken, NJ
,
2003
), pp.
142
169
.
4.
M. C.
Wittmann
and
J. R.
Thompson
, “
Integrated approaches in physics education: A graduate level course in physics, pedagogy, and education research
,”
Am. J. Phys.
76
,
677
683
(
2008
).
5.
E.
Price
and
N.
Finkelstein
, “
Preparing physics graduate students to be educators
,”
Am. J. Phys.
76
,
684
690
(
2008
).
6.
A. E.
Austin
,
M. R.
Connolly
, and
C. L.
Colbeck
, “
Strategies for preparing integrated faculty: The center for the integration of research, teaching, and learning
,”
New Dir. Teach. Learn.
113
,
69
81
(
2008
).
7.
S. L.
Tice
,
J. G.
Gaff
, and A. S. Pruitt-Logan, “
Preparing future faculty programs: Beyond TA development
,” in
The Professional Development of Graduate Teaching Assistants: The Practitioner’s Handbook
, edited by
M.
Marincovich
,
J.
Prostco
, and
F.
Stout
(
Anker Publishing
,
Bolton, MA
,
1998
), pp.
275
292
.
8.
L. C.
McDermott
,
P. S.
Shaffer
, and
the Physics Education Group at the University of Washington
,
Tutorials in Introductory Physics
, 1st ed. (
Prentice Hall
,
Upper Saddle River, NJ
,
2002
).
9.
L. S.
Shulman
, “
Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching
,”
Educ. Res.
15
(
2
),
4
14
(
1986
).
10.
P. L.
Grossman
,
S. M.
Wilson
, and L. S. Shulman, “
Teachers of substance: Subject matter knowledge for teaching
,” in
Knowledge Base for the Beginning Teacher
, edited by
M. C.
Reynolds
(
Pergamon Press
,
Oxford, UK
,
1989
), pp.
23
36
.
11.
S.
Magnusson
,
J.
Krajcik
, and H. Borko, “
Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching
,” in
PCK and Science Education
, edited by
J.
Gess-Newsome
and
N. G.
Lederman
(
Kluwer Academic Publishers
,
Dordrecht, the Netherlands
,
1999
), pp.
95
132
.
12.
E.
Etkina
, “
Pedagogical content knowledge and preparation of high school physics teachers
,”
Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res.
6
,
020110
(
2010
).
13.
N. D.
Finkelstein
, “
Coordinating physics and education instruction
,”
J. Coll. Sci. Teach.
33
(
1
),
37
41
(
2003
).
14.
D. F.
Feldon
 et al, “
Graduate students’ teaching experiences improve their methodological research skills
,”
Science
333
,
1037
1039
(
2011
).
15.

In our case, the Tutorials in Introductory Physics adopt an “Elicit-Confront-Resolve” approach to addressing student difficulties as part of their design. We acknowledge the existence of other approaches (such as the “refinement” of student prior knowledge) in similar curricula and hypothesize that our findings may extend to other such approaches.

16.
N. D.
Finkelstein
and
S. J.
Pollock
, “
Replicating and understanding successful innovations: Implementing tutorials in introductory physics
,”
Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res.
1
,
010101
(
2005
).
17.
V.
Otero
 et al,
“Who is responsible for preparing science teachers?”
Science
313
(
5786
),
445
446
(
2008
).
18.
V.
Otero
 et al, “
A physics department’s role in preparing science teachers: The Colorado learning assistant model
,”
Am. J. Phys.
78
(
11
),
1218
1224
(
2010
).
19.
L. C.
McDermott
,
P. S.
Shaffer
, and the
Physics Education Group at the University of Washington
,
Instructor’s Guide for Tutorials in Introductory Physics
, 1st ed. (
Prentice Hall
,
Upper Saddle River, NJ
,
2002
).
20.
B. T.
Spike
and
N. D.
Finkelstein
, “
Tracking recitation instructors’ awareness of student conceptual difficulties
,” in
PERC Proceedings 2009
, edited by
M.
Sabella
,
C.
Henderson
, and
C.
Singh
(
AIP Press
,
Melville, NY
,
2009
).
21.
See supplementary material at http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.4737852 for additional week-by-week data.
22.
N. D.
Finkelstein
 et al, “
Teaching to Learn: The Colorado learning assistant program’s impact on learning content
,” APS Forum on Education Fall 2006/Spring 2007 Newsletter, 11–13 (
2007
).

Supplementary Material

AAPT members receive access to the American Journal of Physics and The Physics Teacher as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.