The idea of predicting the future from the knowledge of the past is quite natural, even when dealing with systems whose equations of motion are not known. This long-standing issue is revisited in the light of modern ergodic theory of dynamical systems and becomes particularly interesting from a pedagogical perspective due to its close link with Poincaré’s recurrence. Using such a connection, a very general result of ergodic theory—Kac’s lemma—can be used to establish the intrinsic limitations to the possibility of predicting the future from the past. In spite of a naive expectation, predictability is hindered more by the effective number of degrees of freedom of a system than by the presence of chaos. If the effective number of degrees of freedom becomes large enough, whether the system is chaotic or not, predictions turn out to be practically impossible. The discussion of these issues is illustrated with the help of the numerical study of simple models.
REFERENCES
The Qohelet’s Book 1:9, NIV.
We sketch the derivation in the simple case of a discrete-state system as obtained by partitioning the phase-space of the given system into a discrete number of regions , each one defining a coarse-grained state j, such that the probability of a state j is given by . We can focus on a state s. Assume that during the time interval , a system trajectory has visited times the sth state (representing here the set ). Denoting with the time taken by the ith return to the state s, the mean recurrence time is , that is, the inverse of the fraction of time spent by the system in the sth state, . Invoking ergodicity, in the limit , we have and , where is the probability of the sth state (i.e., the probability ) so that , which represents Eq. (14). Replacing and with M – 1 and , respectively, we obtain Eqs. (10) and (11), with , so that for large M, Eq. (11) gives again Kac’s result.