Identical classical particles are distinguishable. This distinguishability affects the number of ways a macrostate can be realized on the microlevel, and from the relation leads to a nonextensive expression for the entropy. This result is usually considered incorrect because of its inconsistency with thermodynamics. It is sometimes concluded from this inconsistency that identical particles are fundamentally indistinguishable and that quantum mechanics is indispensable for making sense of this inconsistency. In contrast, we argue that the classical statistics of distinguishable particles and the resulting nonextensive entropy function are perfectly acceptable from both a theoretical and an experimental perspective. The inconsistency with thermodynamics can be removed by taking into account that the entropy concept in statistical mechanics is not completely identical to the thermodynamical one. We observe that even identical quantum particles are in some cases distinguishable, and conclude that quantum mechanics is irrelevant to the Gibbs paradox.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
July 2011
PAPERS|
July 01 2011
The Gibbs paradox and the distinguishability of identical particles
Marijn A. M. Versteegh;
Marijn A. M. Versteegh
Institute for History and Foundations of Science,
Utrecht University
P.O. Box 80 010, 3508 TA Utrecht, The Netherlands, and Debye Institute for Nanomaterials Science, Utrecht University
, Princetonplein 1, 3584 CC Utrecht, The Netherlands
Search for other works by this author on:
Dennis Dieks
Dennis Dieks
Institute for History and Foundations of Science,
Utrecht University
, P.O. Box 80 010, 3508 TA Utrecht, The Netherlands
Search for other works by this author on:
Am. J. Phys. 79, 741–746 (2011)
Article history
Received:
December 03 2010
Accepted:
April 09 2011
Connected Content
A related article has been published:
Comment on “The Gibbs paradox and the distinguishability of identical particles,” by M. A. M. Versteegh and D. Dieks [Am. J. Phys. 79, 741–746 (2011)]
Citation
Marijn A. M. Versteegh, Dennis Dieks; The Gibbs paradox and the distinguishability of identical particles. Am. J. Phys. 1 July 2011; 79 (7): 741–746. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.3584179
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
All objects and some questions
Charles H. Lineweaver, Vihan M. Patel
Exact solutions for the inverse problem of the time-independent Schrödinger equation
Bhavika Bhalgamiya, Mark A. Novotny
In this issue: January 2025
Joanna Behrman, Pierre-François Cohadon, et al.
Introductory learning of quantum probability and quantum spin with physical models and observations
Anastasia Lonshakova, Kyla Adams, et al.
Erratum: “All objects and some questions” [Am. J. Phys. 91, 819–825 (2023)]
Charles H. Lineweaver, Vihan M. Patel
Quantum information science and technology high school outreach: Conceptual progression for introducing principles and programming skills
Dominik Schneble, Tzu-Chieh Wei, et al.
Related Content
The ambiguity of “distinguishability” in statistical mechanics
American Journal of Physics (June 2015)
Comment on “The Gibbs paradox and the distinguishability of identical particles,” by M. A. M. Versteegh and D. Dieks [Am. J. Phys. 79, 741–746 (2011)]
American Journal of Physics (February 2012)
Nature of Reality According to Einstein’s Statistical‐Thermodynamic and Geometric Ideas Today
AIP Conference Proceedings (November 2006)
Yet another resolution of the Gibbs paradox: an information theory approach
AIP Conference Proceedings (May 2002)
Gibbs, Boltzmann, and negative temperatures
Am. J. Phys. (February 2015)