The Hamilton–Jacobi equation in classical mechanics and the related eikonal equation in geometrical optics are often described as the “point of closest approach” between classical and quantum mechanics. Most textbook treatments of Hamilton–Jacobi theory are aimed at graduate students and derive the equation only after a long introduction to canonical transformations. Most treatments of the eikonal equation only emphasize its use in geometrical optics. We show that both the Hamilton–Jacobi equation and the eikonal equation can be derived by a common procedure using only elementary aspects of the Lagrangian and Hamiltonian formalisms introduced in undergraduate classical mechanics courses. Through this common approach, we hope to highlight to undergraduates the deep connections between classical mechanics, classical wave theory, and Schrödinger’s wave mechanics.

1.
J. R.
Taylor
,
Classical Mechanics
(
University Science Books
,
Sausalito, CA
,
2005
).
2.
S. T.
Thornton
and
J. B.
Marion
,
Classical Dynamics of Particles and Systems
, 5th ed. (
Brooks/Cole
,
New York
,
2004
).
3.
Historically, the Hamilton–Jacobi and the eikonal equations played a crucial role in Schrödinger’s discovery of the equation that bears his name. See, for example, his 1926 seminal paper “Quantization as a problem of proper values, Part II,” an English translation of which can be found in
Collected Papers on Wave Mechanics by E. Schrödinger, Together with His Four Lectures on Wave Mechanics
(
Chelsea Publishing Company
,
New York
,
1982
). The “four lectures” in this volume are much less technical than the original paper and can be read with profit by undergraduate students.
4.
H.
Goldstein
,
Classical Mechanics
, 2nd ed. (
Addison-Wesley
,
Reading, MA
,
1980
). See the treatment on pp.
484
492
for the connection between wave mechanics and Hamilton–Jacobi theory.
5.
J. V.
Jose
and
E. J.
Saletan
,
Classical Dynamics: A Contemporary Approach
(
Cambridge U. P.
,
Cambridge
,
1998
).
6.
L. N.
Hand
and
J. D.
Finch
,
Analytical Mechanics
(
Cambridge U. P.
,
Cambridge
,
1998
).
7.
L. D.
Landau
and
E. M.
Lifshitz
,
Mechanics
(
Butterworth-Heinemann
,
Oxford
,
1976
), pp.
138
139
,
147
149
.
8.
C. C.
Yan
, “
Simplified derivation of the Hamilton-Jacobi equation
,”
Am. J. Phys.
52
,
555
556
(
1984
).
9.
R.
Courant
and
D.
Hilbert
,
Methods of Mathematical Physics
(
Interscience Publishers
,
London
,
1962
), Vol.
2
.
10.
The eikonal equation follows from Maxwell’s equations in the limit of short wavelengths. For a derivation see, for example,
M.
Born
and
E.
Wolf
,
Principles of Optics
, 7th ed. (
Cambridge U. P.
,
Cambridge
,
1999
).
11.
P. M.
Morse
and
H.
Feshbach
,
Methods of Theoretical Physics, Part II
(
McGraw-Hill
,
Boston
,
1953
).
12.
R. P.
Feynman
,
R. B.
Leighton
, and
M. L.
Sands
,
The Feynman Lectures on Physics
(
Addison-Wesley
,
Reading, MA
,
1964
), Vol.
2
, p.
19
9
.
13.
R.
Landauer
, “
Path concepts in Hamilton-Jacobi theory
,”
Am. J. Phys.
20
,
363
367
(
1952
).
AAPT members receive access to the American Journal of Physics and The Physics Teacher as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.