The behavior of a squash ball constitutes an excellent case study of the dynamic behavior of rubbery materials. It is shown that the complex viscoelastic behavior of rubber can be investigated using simple drop bounce tests and compression tests. The drop tests show that the coefficient of restitution increases as the ball temperature increases. The compression tests show that as the speed of compression increases or as the ball temperature decreases, the compressive force and the energy loss both increase. These effects are due to the viscoelastic nature of the rubber and are an excellent example of the time-temperature equivalence of polymers. Compression tests were performed on balls with small holes at the base to separate the effects of the internal air pressure from the material deformation. It was found that the internal air pressure contributed about one-third to the compressive force, but contributed little to energy loss. This behavior shows that the rubber material dominates the rebound behavior and that the normal warming up process at the start of a squash game is important to raise the temperature of the rubber rather than to increase the internal air pressure.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
March 2011
PAPERS|
March 01 2011
The dynamic behavior of squash balls
Gareth J. Lewis;
Gareth J. Lewis
School of Engineering,
Swansea University
, Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8PP, United Kingdom
Search for other works by this author on:
J. Cris Arnold;
J. Cris Arnold
School of Engineering,
Swansea University
, Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8PP, United Kingdom
Search for other works by this author on:
Iwan W. Griffiths
Iwan W. Griffiths
School of Engineering,
Swansea University
, Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8PP, United Kingdom
Search for other works by this author on:
Am. J. Phys. 79, 291–296 (2011)
Article history
Received:
February 26 2010
Accepted:
September 23 2010
Citation
Gareth J. Lewis, J. Cris Arnold, Iwan W. Griffiths; The dynamic behavior of squash balls. Am. J. Phys. 1 March 2011; 79 (3): 291–296. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.3531971
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
A simple model of a gravitational lens from geometric optics
Bogdan Szafraniec, James F. Harford
Playing with active matter
Angelo Barona Balda, Aykut Argun, et al.
The physics of “everesting” on a bicycle
Martin Bier
Why is there no Poisson spot in a solar eclipse?
Jami J. Kinnunen
Related Content
Impact behavior of hollow balls
Am. J. Phys. (March 2014)
The bounce of a ball
American Journal of Physics (March 1999)
Measurements of the horizontal coefficient of restitution for a superball and a tennis ball
American Journal of Physics (May 2002)
The coefficient of restitution for collisions of happy balls, unhappy balls, and tennis balls
American Journal of Physics (November 2000)
Squashing Method for Moment of Inertia Calculations
Phys. Teach. (November 2019)