We study how introductory physics students engage in reflection with peers about problem solving. The recitations for an introductory physics course with 200 students were broken into a “peer reflection” (PR) group and a traditional group. Each week in recitation, small teams of students in the PR group reflected on selected problems from the homework and discussed why the solutions of some students employed better problem solving strategies than others. The graduate and undergraduate teaching assistants in the PR recitations provided guidance and coaching to help students learn effective problem solving heuristics. In the traditional group recitations students could ask the graduate TA questions about the homework before they took a weekly quiz. The traditional group recitation quiz questions were similar to the homework questions selected for peer reflection in the PR group recitations. As one measure of the impact of this intervention, we investigated how likely students were to draw diagrams to help with problem solving on the final exam with only multiple-choice questions. We found that the PR group drew diagrams on more problems than the traditional group even when there was no explicit reward for doing so. Also, students who drew more diagrams for the multiple-choice questions outperformed those who did not, regardless of which group they were a member.
REFERENCES
1.
F.
Reif
, “Scientific approaches to science education
,” Phys. Today
39
(11
), 48
–54
(1986
).2.
F.
Reif
, “Millikan Lecture 1994: Understanding and teaching important scientific thought processes
,” Am. J. Phys.
63
, 17
–32
(1995
).3.
F.
Reif
, “Teaching problem solving—A scientific approach
,” Phys. Teach.
19
, 310
–316
(1981
).4.
J. H.
Larkin
and F.
Reif
, “Understanding and teaching problem solving in physics
,” Eur. J. Sci. Educ.
1
(2
), 191
–203
(1979
).5.
J.
Larkin
, “Cognition of learning physics
,” Am. J. Phys.
49
(6
), 534
–541
(1981
).6.
J.
Larkin
, J.
McDermott
, D.
Simon
, and H.
Simon
, “Expert and novice performance in solving physics problems
,” Science
208
, 1335
–1342
(1980
).7.
D.
Maloney
, “Research in problem solving: Physics
,” in Handbook of Research on the Teaching and Learning of Science
, edited by D.
Gabel
(MacMillan
, New York
, 1994
).8.
J.
Larkin
and H.
Simon
, “Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words
,” Cogn. Sci.
11
(1
), 65
–99
(1987
).9.
J.
Larkin
, “Understanding, problem representations, and skill in physics
,” in Thinking and Learning Skills
, edited by S. F.
Chipman
, J. W.
Segal
, and R.
Glaser
(Erlbaum
, Hillsdale, NJ
, 1985
), Vol. 2
, pp. 141
–159
.10.
J.
Kaput
, “Representation and problem solving: Methodological issues related to modeling
,” in Teaching and Learning Mathematical Problem Solving: Multiple Research Perspectives
, edited by E. A.
Silver
(Erlbaum
, Hillsdale, NJ
, 1985
), pp. 381
–398
.11.
M.
Gick
and K.
Holyoak
, “The cognitive basis of knowledge transfer
,” in Transfer of Learning: Contemporary Research and Applications
, edited by S. M.
Cornier
and J. D.
Hagman
(Academic
, New York
, 1987
).12.
K.
Holyoak
and P.
Thagard
, Mental Leaps: Analogy in Creative Thought
(MIT
, Cambridge, MA
, 1995
).13.
C.
Singh
, “When physical intuition fails
,” Am. J. Phys.
70
(11
), 1103
–1109
(2002
).14.
15.
A.
Schoenfeld
, “Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense-making in mathematics
,” in Handbook for Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning
, edited by D.
Grouws
(McMillan
, New York
, 1992
), pp. 334
–370
.16.
A.
Schoenfeld
, “Teaching mathematical thinking and problem solving
,” in Toward the Thinking Curriculum: Current Cognitive Research
, edited by L. B.
Resnick
and B. L.
Klopfer
(ASCD
, Washington, DC
, 1989
), pp. 83
–103
.17.
A.
Schoenfeld
and D. J.
Herrmann
, “Problem perception and knowledge structure in expert novice mathematical problem solvers
,” J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn.
8
, 484
–494
(1982
).18.
M.
Chi
, P.
Feltovich
, and R.
Glaser
, “Categorization and representation of physics knowledge by experts and novices
,” Cogn. Sci.
5
, 121
–152
(1981
).19.
R.
Dufresne
, J.
Mestre
, T.
Thaden-Koch
, W.
Gerace
, and W.
Leonard
, “Knowledge representation and coordination in the transfer process
,” in Transfer of Learning from a Modern Multidisciplinary Perspective
, edited by J. P.
Mestre
(Information Age
, Greenwich, CT
, 2005
), pp. 155
–215
.20.
P.
Hardiman
, R.
Dufresne
, and J.
Mestre
, “The relation between problem categorization and problem solving among novices and experts
,” Mem. Cognit.
17
, 627
–638
(1989
).21.
C.
Singh
, “Categorization of problems to assess and improve proficiency as teacher and learner
,” Am. J. Phys.
77
(1
), 73
–80
(2009
).22.
C.
Singh
, “Assessing student expertise in introductory physics with isomorphic problems, Part II: Examining the effect of some potential factors on problem solving and transfer
,” Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res.
4
, 010105
–1
(2008
).23.
P.
Black
and D.
Wiliam
, “Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment
,” Phi Delta Kappan
80
(2
), 139
–148
(1998
).24.
P.
Black
and D.
Wiliam
, “Assessment and classroom learning
,” Assessment in Education
5
(1
), 7
–74
(1998
).25.
M. T. H.
Chi
, M.
Bassok
, M. W.
Lewis
, P.
Reiman
, and R.
Glaser
, “Self explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems
,” Cogn. Sci.
13
, 143
–182
(1989
).26.
E.
Yerushalmi
, C.
Singh
, and B.
Eylon
, “Physics learning in the context of scaffolded diagnostic tasks (I): The experimental setup
,” in Proceedings of the Phys. Ed. Res. Conference
, Greensboro, NC, edited by L.
Hsu
, L.
McCullough
, and C.
Henderson
(AIP
, Melville
, 2007
);E.
Yerushalmi
, C.
Singh
, and B.
Eylon
, AIP Conf. Proc.
951
, 27
–30
(2007
).27.
E.
Mazur
, Peer Instruction: A User’s Manual
(Prentice-Hall
, Upper Saddle River, NJ
, 1997
).28.
E.
Mazur
, “Farewell, Lecture?
,” Science
323
, 50
–51
(2009
).29.
C.
Crouch
and E.
Mazur
, “Peer Instruction: Ten years of experience and results
,” Am. J. Phys.
69
, 970
–977
(2001
).30.
E.
Mazur
, “Understanding or memorization: Are we teaching the right thing?
,” in Conference on the Introductory Physics Course on the Occasion of the Retirement of Robert Resnick
, edited by J.
Wilson
(Wiley
, New York
, 1997
), pp. 113
–124
.31.
P.
Heller
, R.
Keith
, and S.
Anderson
, “Teaching problem solving through cooperative grouping. Part I: Group versus individual problem solving
,” Am. J. Phys.
60
, 627
–636
(1992
).32.
P.
Heller
and M.
Hollabaugh
, “Teaching problem solving through cooperative grouping. Part 2: Designing problems and structuring groups
,” Am. J. Phys.
60
, 637
–644
(1992
).33.
C.
Singh
, “Impact of peer interaction on conceptual test performance
,” Am. J. Phys.
73
(5
), 446
–451
(2005
).34.
R. J.
Marzano
, R. S.
Brandt
, C. S.
Hughes
, B. F.
Jones
, B. Z.
Presseisen
, S. C.
Rankin
, and C.
Suhor
, Dimensions of Thinking: A Framework for Curriculum and Instruction
(Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development
, Alexandria, VA
, 1988
).35.
A.
Collins
, J. S.
Brown
, and S. E.
Newman
, “Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing and mathematics
,” in Knowing, Learning, and Instruction: Essays in Honor of Robert Glaser
, edited by L. B.
Resnick
(Erlbaum
, Hillsdale, NJ
, 1989
), pp. 453
–494
.36.
37.
M. T. H.
Chi
, “Self-explaining expository texts: The dual processes of generating inferences and repairing mental models
,” in Advances in Instructional Psychology
, edited by R.
Glaser
(Erlbaum
, Hillsdale, NJ
, 2000
), pp. 161
–238
.38.
39.
See supplementary material at http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.3319652 for the histograms of the total number of quantitative or conceptual questions with diagrams and scratch work versus the percentage of students for each group.
40.
For example, see
G.
Glass
and K.
Hopkins
, Statistical Methods in Psychology and Education
, 3rd ed. (Allyn and Bacon
, Needham Heights, MA
, 1996
), p. 291
.© 2010 American Association of Physics Teachers.
2010
American Association of Physics Teachers
AAPT members receive access to the American Journal of Physics and The Physics Teacher as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.
