I reconsider the problem of a raindrop falling through mist, collecting mass, and generalize it to allow an arbitrary power-law form for the accretion rate. I show that the coupled differential equations can be solved by the simple trick of temporarily eliminating time in favor of the raindrop’s mass as the independent variable.
REFERENCES
1.
K. S.
Krane
, “The falling raindrop: Variations on a theme of Newton
,” Am. J. Phys.
49
, 113
–117
(1981
).2.
I.
Adawi
, “Comments on the raindrop problem
,” Am. J. Phys.
54
, 739
–740
(1986
).3.
B. G.
Dick
, “On the raindrop problem
,” Am. J. Phys.
54
, 852
–854
(1986
).4.
M. H.
Partovi
and D. R.
Aston
, “The generalized raindrop problem
,” Am. J. Phys.
57
, 912
–920
(1989
).5.
As a recent article put it, “undergraduate mechanics students are sometimes [my emphasis] able to solve the nonlinear dynamical equations of motion to find the deceptively simple acceleration ” [
B. F.
Edwards
, J. W.
Wilder
, and E. E.
Scime
, “Dynamics of falling raindrops
,” Eur. J. Phys.
22
, 113
–118
(2001
)].A physics student, answering another student’s query on an online forum, was blunter: “This is a very old problem. Unfortunately, I remember the answer, , but I don’t remember how you get it. It has an unusual solution. There [is] a special substitution that you need to make for the mass; otherwise the problem is insoluble” ⟨www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=198859⟩.
6.
For instance, if , then Eq. (3) is separable [in particular, when , the solution to Eq. (3) gives the usual conservation-of-energy equation]. If , then Eq. (3) is a first-order linear equation with nonconstant coefficients for the function ; and more generally, if , then Eq. (3) is a first-order linear equation for the function . Likewise, if , then Eq. (3) can be turned upside-down to obtain a first-order linear equation with nonconstant coefficients for the inverse function ; and more generally, if , then Eq. (3) gives a first-order linear equation for the function .
7.
At least two other cases of Eq. (6) correspond to physically realizable (albeit highly artificial) situations: namely, and arise when the raindrop is constrained (for example, by a massless container) to be a cylinder of fixed base and growing height (respectively, fixed height and growing base). Note that the cylinder’s base can be of arbitrary shape and need not be circular.
8.
The case needs to be treated separately and yields . Of course, all cases are unphysical.
9.
The case needs to be treated separately and yields . Of course, all cases are probably unphysical.
10.
This step assumes .
11.
This step assumes and .
© 2010 American Association of Physics Teachers.
2010
American Association of Physics Teachers
AAPT members receive access to the American Journal of Physics and The Physics Teacher as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.