We have modified our intermediate optics laboratory to improve student understanding through the use of active learning. Our approach relies on the direct confrontation of misconceptions through the use of predictions, collection of data to support or refute the predictions, reconciliation of the predictions and observations, discussions, and leading questions. This method differs from the traditional approach in which students are provided a series of detailed instructions. Through the class and the laboratory we build conceptual understanding in subjects such as image formation by lenses and mirrors, ray optics, and elliptical polarization while fostering laboratory independence and helping students erect a new paradigm for learning. We present data indicating improved student understanding of optics through the course of the semester.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
PAPERS|
May 01 2010
Active learning in intermediate optics through concept building laboratories
Mark F. Masters;
Mark F. Masters
Department of Physics,
Indiana University–Purdue University Fort Wayne
, Fort Wayne, Indiana 46805
Search for other works by this author on:
Timothy T. Grove
Timothy T. Grove
Department of Physics,
Indiana University–Purdue University Fort Wayne
, Fort Wayne, Indiana 46805
Search for other works by this author on:
Am. J. Phys. 78, 485–491 (2010)
Article history
Received:
September 15 2009
Accepted:
March 16 2010
Citation
Mark F. Masters, Timothy T. Grove; Active learning in intermediate optics through concept building laboratories. Am. J. Phys. 1 May 2010; 78 (5): 485–491. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.3381077
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
A simple model of a gravitational lens from geometric optics
Bogdan Szafraniec, James F. Harford
Playing with active matter
Angelo Barona Balda, Aykut Argun, et al.
The physics of “everesting” on a bicycle
Martin Bier
Related Content
The Pedagogical Value of “Obvious” Questions in Introductory Physics
Phys. Teach. (November 2013)
Resource Letter ALIP–1: Active-Learning Instruction in Physics
American Journal of Physics (June 2012)
Millikan Lecture 2009: Physics for all: From special needs to Olympiads
Am. J. Phys. (April 2010)
Data Reconciliation and Gross Error Detection: A Filtered Measurement Test
AIP Conference Proceedings (June 2008)
Studio optics: Adapting interactive engagement pedagogy to upper-division physics
Am. J. Phys. (March 2011)