We update Ampère’s theory using vector notation and derive his expression for the force between two current elements. We assume that the two elements are in different current loops and integrate over one to obtain the force on a differential element in the second. This procedure allows us to define the magnetic field in a natural manner and to derive the Lorentz force for a current segment. We equate the magnetic moments of current and permanent magnet dipoles and show that Biot and Savart could have performed their experiment using a small current loop, thus establishing the Biot-Savart law as a consequence of Ampère’s theory.

1.
Ampère described this work in several mèmoires in the 1820s. The one most often referenced is “Théorie mathématique des phénomènes electro-dynamique uniquement déduite de l’expérience,” in Mémoires de l’Académie Royale des Sciences de la Institut de France, Année 1823, Tome VI, Paris, Chez Fermin Didot, Pére et Fils, 1827. A copy of this work and others by Ampère are available in French at ⟨www.ampere.cnrs.fr⟩. Portions of Ampère’s work are reprinted in English in Ref. 2.
2.
R. A. R.
Tricker
,
Early Electrodynamics: The First Law of Circulation
(
Pergamon
,
Oxford
,
1965
).
3.
L. Pearce
Williams
, “
What were Ampère’s earliest discoveries in electrodynamics?
,”
Isis
74
,
492
508
(
1983
).
4.
C.
Blondel
,
A.-M. Ampere et la creation de l’electrodynamique (1820–1827)
(
Bibliothèque Nationale
,
Paris
,
1982
).
5.
H.
Erlichson
, “
André-Marie Ampère, the ‘Newton of Electricity,’ and how the simplicity criterion resulted in the disuse of his formula
,”
Physis (Florence)
37
(
1
),
53
71
(
2000
).
6.
H.
Erlichson
, “
The experiments of Biot and Savart concerning the force exerted by a current on a magnetic needle
,”
Am. J. Phys.
66
,
385
391
(
1998
).
7.
J. R.
Reitz
,
F. J.
Milford
, and
R. W.
Christy
,
Foundations of Electromagnetic Theory
, 4th ed. (
Addison-Wesley
,
Reading, MA
,
1993
), p.
191
.
8.
J. D.
Jackson
,
Classical Electrodynamics
, 3rd ed. (
Wiley
,
New York
,
1999
), pp.
175
178
.
9.
H. A.
Lorentz
,
The Theory of Electrons
(
Dover
,
Mineola
,
2003
), pp.
14
15
. After presenting the equation, Lorentz says “Like our former equations it is got by generalizing the results of electromagnetic experiments.” Unfortunately, he does not say which experiments.
10.
P.
Graneau
and
N.
Graneau
,
Newtonian Electrodynamics
(
World Scientific
,
Singapore
,
1996
), pp.
28
34
.
11.

See footnote 14 in Ref. 6, which quotes the Blunn translation of Ampère’s memoir of Ref. 1 which, in turn, appears in Ref. 2. The item in question is an extensive footnote in Ampère’s paper referring to the Biot-Savart experiment and to an important logical error that they committed. Blunn tones down Ampère’s indictment of Biot and Savart considerably. In his original footnote in Ref. 1, Ampère makes it plain that Biot and Savart are guessing and complains about their failure to acknowledge a presentation by Felix Savary correcting the error.

12.
H.
Grassman
, “
A new theory of electrodynamics
,”
Ann. Phys. Chem.
64
(
1
),
1
18
(
1845
). An English translation appears in Ref. 2.
13.
This program was carried out in 1929 by
M.
Mason
and
W.
Weaver
in
The Electromagnetic Field
(
Dover
,
New York
,
1929
), pp.
176
184
. Their vector notation is dated, and they did not use isotropy arguments to support their manipulations. Thus, this train of thought is still relatively inaccessible by today’s students.
14.
V.
Gorini
and
A.
Zecca
, “
Isotropy of space
,”
J. Math. Phys.
11
(
7
),
2226
2230
(
1970
).
15.

A function is a special kind of relation. Thus, we can express y=F(x1,x2,,xm) in the form yF(x1,x2,,xm)=0, thus giving rise to a relation in m+1 variables. If F(Qv,ϕx1,Qv,ϕx2,,Qv,ϕxm)=Qv,ϕy for any choice of v and ϕ, we say F is an isotropy or is an isotropic mapping. If F is a scalar function, then no rotation operator multiplies y and F is a scalar invariant. We will use the definition of isotropy in this form applied to the element pair force function Fmn.

16.
J. R.
Hoffmann
, “
Ampère’s invention of equilibrium apparatus: A response to experimental anomaly
,”
Isis
20
,
309
341
(
1987
). References 1, 2, and 5 in the present paper (the last two in English) also describe Ampère’s four experiments.
17.
The idea we develop here was inspired by
C.
Christodoulides
, “
Comparison of the Ampère and Biot-Savart magnetostatic force laws in their line-current-element forms
,”
Am. J. Phys.
56
,
357
362
(
1988
).
18.
Ampere believed that magnetism was caused by circulating currents and did a number of experiments to demonstrate this idea. Several, including the effects of magnetism on a simple loop, are discussed in detail in
A.-M.
Ampère
and
J.
Babinet
,
Exposé des nouvelles découvertes sur l’electricité at le magnétisme
(
Chez Méquignon-Marvis
,
Paris
,
1822
), pp.
6
15
.
It is available at ⟨books.google.fr⟩.
19.
J.
Larsson
, “
Electromagnetics from a quasistatic perspective
,”
Am. J. Phys.
75
,
230
239
(
2007
).
20.
G.
Ruppeiner
,
M.
Grossman
, and
A.
Tafti
, “
Test of the Biot-Savart law to distances of 15m
,”
Am. J. Phys.
64
,
698
705
(
1996
).
21.
Y.-S.
Huang
, “
Has the Lorentz-covariant electromagnetic force law been directly tested experimentally?
,”
Found. Phys. Lett.
6
,
257
274
(
1993
).
22.
This observation and a specific application of our brief closing commentary was apparently first applied to prove the equivalence of the Biot-Savart and Ampère force laws by
R. C.
Lyness
, “
The equivalence of Ampère’s electrodynamic law and that of Biot and Savart
,”
Contemp. Phys.
4
,
453
455
(
1963
).
Many others have since appeared, and an extensive list of references is given in Ref. 10, Chap. 2.
23.
A. M.
Davis
, “
A generalized Helmholtz theorem for time-varying vector fields
,”
Am. J. Phys.
74
,
72
76
(
2006
).
24.
D.
Griffiths
,
Introduction to Electrodynamics
, 3rd ed. (
Prentice Hall
,
Upper Saddle River
,
1999
).
AAPT members receive access to the American Journal of Physics and The Physics Teacher as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.