We present the results of a national study on the teaching and learning of astronomy as taught in general education, non-science-major, introductory astronomy courses. Nearly 4000 students enrolled in 69 sections of courses taught by 36 different instructors at 31 institutions completed (pre- and post-instruction) the Light and Spectroscopy Concept Inventory (LSCI) from Fall 2006 to Fall 2007. The classes varied in size and were from all types of institutions, including 2- and colleges and universities. Normalized gain scores for each class were calculated. Pre-instruction LSCI scores were clustered around , independent of class size and institution type, and normalized gain scores varied from about to 0.50. To estimate the fraction of classroom time spent on learner-centered, active-engagement instruction we developed and administered an Interactivity Assessment Instrument (IAI). Our results suggest that the differences in gains were due to instruction in the classroom, not the type of class or institution. We also found that higher interactivity classes had the highest gains, confirming that interactive learning strategies are capable of increasing student conceptual understanding. However, the wide range of gain scores seen for both lower and higher interactivity classes suggests that the use of interactive learning strategies is not sufficient by itself to achieve high student gain.
REFERENCES
1.
A.
Fraknoi
and S. C.
Wolff
, “Astronomy Education Review: A Five-Year Progress Report and Thoughts about the Journal’s Future
,” Astr. Ed. Rev.
5
(2
), 1
–4
(2007
).2.
J. M.
Bailey
and T. F.
Slater
, “Resource Letter AER-1: Astronomy Education Research
,” Am. J. Phys.
73
(8
), 677
–685
(2005
).3.
L. C.
McDermott
and E. F.
Redish
, “Resource Letter: PER-1: Physics Education Research
,” Am. J. Phys.
67
(9
), 755
–767
(1999
).4.
E. E.
Prather
, T. F.
Slater
, and E. G.
Offerdahl
, “Hints of a fundamental misconception in cosmology
,” Astr. Ed. Rev.
1
(2
), 28
–34
(2002
).5.
E. E.
Prather
, “Students’ Beliefs about the Role of Atoms in Radioactive Decay and Half-life
,” J. Geosci Ed.
53
(4
), 345
–354
(2005
).6.
J. M.
Bailey
, “Development of a Concept Inventory to Assess Students’ Understanding and Reasoning Difficulties about the Properties and Formation of Stars
,” Ph.D. thesis, The University of Arizona, Dept. of Education
, 2006
.7.
E. M.
Bardar
, E. E.
Prather
, K.
Brecher
, and T. F.
Slater
, “Development and Validation of the Light and Spectroscopy Concept Inventory
,” Astr. Ed. Rev.
5
(2
), 103
–113
(2007
).8.
Richard R.
Hake
, “Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses
,” Am. J. Phys.
66
(1
), 64
–74
(1998
).9.
D. W.
Hudgins
, E. E.
Prather
, D. J.
Grayson
, and D. P.
Smits
, “Effectiveness of Collaborative Ranking Tasks on Student Understanding of Key Astronomy Concepts
,” Astr. Ed. Rev.
5
(1
), 1
–22
(2006
).10.
E.
Prather
, T.
Slater
, J.
Adams
, J. M.
Bailey
, L. V.
Jones
, and J. A.
Dostal
, “Research on a Lecture-Tutorial Approach to Teaching Introductory Astronomy for Nonscience Majors
,” Astr. Ed. Rev.
3
(2
), 122
–136
(2004
).11.
A.
Lightman
and P.
Sadler
, “Teacher Predictions versus Actual Student Gains
,” Phys. Teach.
31
(3
), 162
–167
(1993
).12.
N.
Finkelstein
, “Researching Reform: Studies of Transforming Undergraduate Physics (& Other Advances in Physics Education Research)
,” talk presented at the Weekly University of Arizona Physics Colloquium
, Tucson, AZ (2006
) (private communication).13.
P. M.
Sadler
, “The Initial Knowledge State of High School Astronomy Students
,” Ed.D. thesis, Harvard University
, 1992
.14.
E. F.
Reddish
, J. M.
Saul
, and R. N.
Steinberg
, “Student expectations in introductory physics
,” Am. J. Phys.
66
(3
), 212
–224
(1998
).15.
E.
Seymour
and N. M.
Hewitt
, Talking about Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave the Sciences
, (Westview
, Boulder, CO
, 1997
).16.
M.
Zeilik
and V. J.
Morris
, “An Examination of Misconceptions in an Astronomy Course for Science, Mathematics, and Engineering Majors
,” Astr. Ed. Rev.
2
(1
), 101
–119
(2003
).17.
M.
Zeilik
, C.
Schau
, and N.
Mattern
, “Conceptual Astronomy. II. Replicating Conceptual Gains, Probing Attitude Changes Across Three Semesters
,” Am. J. Phys.
67
(10
), 923
–927
(1999
).18.
G.
Brissenden
, T. F.
Slater
, R.
Mathieu
, and NISE College Level-One Team
, “The Role of Assessment in the Development of the College Introductory Astronomy Course: A “How-To” Guide for Instructors
,” Astr. Ed. Rev.
1
(1
), 1
–24
(2002
).19.
How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, & School
, edited by J. D.
Bransford
, A. L.
Brown
, and R. R.
Cocking
(National Academies
, Washington, DC
, 1999
).20.
A.
Fraknoi
, “Enrollments in Astronomy 101 Courses: An Update
,” Astr. Ed. Rev.
1
(1
), 121
–123
(2002
).21.
F.
Lawrenz
, D.
Huffman
, and K.
Appeldoorn
, “Enhancing the Instructional Environment: Optimal Learning in Introductory Science Classes
,” J. Coll. Sci. Teach.
34
(7
), 40
–44
(2005
).22.
R. S.
Lindell
, “Enhancing College Students’ Understanding of Lunar Phases
,” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Physics, The University of Nebraska—Lincoln
, 2002
.23.
J. M.
Keller
, “Development of a Concept Inventory Addressing Students’ Beliefs and Reasoning Difficulties Regarding the Greenhouse Effect
,” Ph.D. thesis, Department of Lunar and Planetary Sciences, The University of Arizona
, 2006
.24.
E. M.
Bardar
, E. E.
Prather
, K.
Brecher
, and T. F.
Slater
, “The Need for a Light and Spectroscopy Concept Inventory for Assessing Innovations in Introductory Astronomy Survey Courses
,” Astr. Ed. Rev.
4
(2
), 20
–27
(2006
).25.
T. F.
Slater
, J. P.
Adams
, G.
Brissenden
, and D.
Duncan
, “What topics are taught in introductory astronomy courses?
” Phys. Teach.
39
(1
), 52
–55
(2001
).26.
M.
Zeilik
and V. J.
Morris-Dueer
, “What are essential concepts in ‘Astronomy 101’? A new approach to find consensus from two different samples of instructors
,” Astr. Ed. Rev.
3
(2
), 61
–108
(2005
).27.
L. S.
Shulman
, “Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching
,” Educ. Res.
15
(2
), 4
–14
(1986
).28.
L. S.
Shulman
, “Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform
,” Harv. Educ. Rev.
57
(1
), 1
–22
(1987
).29.
Examining Pedagogical Content Knowledge: The Construct & its Implications for Science Education
, edited by J.
Gess-Newsome
and N. G.
Lederman
(Kluwer Academic
, Norwell, MA
, 1999
).30.
S.
Magnusson
, J.
Krajck
, and H.
Borko
, “Nature, Sources and Development of Pedagogical Content Knowledge for Science Teaching
,” in Examining Pedagogical Content Knowledge: The Construct & its Implications for Science Education
, edited by J.
Gess-Newsome
and N. G.
Lederman
(Kluwer Academic
, Norwell, MA
, 1999
).31.
E. M.
Bardar
, “First Results from the Light and Spectroscopy Concept Inventory
,” Astr. Ed. Rev.
6
(2
), 75
–84
(2008
).32.
G.
Deming
and B.
Hufnagel
, “Who’s taking ASTRO 101?
” Phys. Teach.
39
, 368
–369
(2001
).33.
C. H.
Crouch
and E.
Mazur
, “Peer instruction: Ten years of experience and results
,” Am. J. Phys.
69
(9
), 970
–977
(2001
).34.
K.
Cummings
, J.
Marx
, R.
Thornton
, and D.
Kuhl
, “Evaluating innovation in studio physics
,” Am. J. Phys.
67
(7
), S38
–S44
(1999
).35.
P. A.
Kraus
, “Promoting Active Learning in Lecture-Based Courses: Demonstrations, Tutorials, and Interactive Tutorial Lectures
,” Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Washington
, 1997
, University Microfilms
, UMI No. 9736313.36.
The Center for Astronomy Education
(CAE) academic listserv for astronomy teaching and learning is called Astrolrner@CAE and can be found on the web at http://astronomy101.jpl.nasa.gov/discussion.© 2009 American Association of Physics Teachers.
2009
American Association of Physics Teachers
AAPT members receive access to the American Journal of Physics and The Physics Teacher as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.
