We describe a course designed to help future educators develop an integrated understanding of different elements of physics education research (PER), including research into student learning, content knowledge from the perspective of how it is learned, and reform-based curricula, together with evidence of their effectiveness. Course elements include equal parts of physics study through proven curricula and discussion of research results in the context of the PER literature. We provide examples of the course content and structure and representative examples of student learning in the class.

1.
R.
Duit
, “
Bibliography–STCSE: Students’ and teachers’ conceptions and science education
,” www.ipn.uni-kiel.de/aktuell/stcse/stcse.html.
2.
J. R.
Thompson
and
B. S.
Ambrose
, “
A literary canon in physics education research
,” APS Forum on Education Fall 2005 Newsletter, p.
16
; units.aps.org/units/fed/newsletters/fall2005/canon.html.
3.
C. E.
Wieman
and
K. K.
Perkins
, “
Transforming physics education
,”
Phys. Today
58
(
11
),
36
41
(
2005
).
4.

Reference to be determined in publication, Finkelstein and Price article submitted in parallel with this article.

5.
L.
Shulman
, “
Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching
,”
Educ. Res.
15
(
2
),
4
14
(
1986
).
6.
L. C.
McDermott
,
P. S.
Shaffer
, and The Physics Education Group at the University of Washington,
Tutorials in Introductory Physics
(
Prentice Hall
, Upper Saddle River, NJ,
2002
).
7.
J. P.
Gutwill
,
J. R.
Frederiksen
, and
B. Y.
White
, “
Making their own connections: Students’ understanding of multiple models in basic electricity
,”
Cogn. Instruct.
17
(
3
),
249
282
(
1999
).
8.
L. C.
McDermott
and
P. S.
Shaffer
, “
Research as a guide for curriculum development: An example from introductory electricity. Part I: Investigation of student understanding
,”
Am. J. Phys.
61
,
994
1003
(
1992
).
9.
P. S.
Shaffer
and
L. C.
McDermott
, “
Research as a guide for curriculum development: An example from introductory electricity. Part II: Design of an instructional strategy
,”
Am. J. Phys.
61
,
1003
1013
(
1992
).
10.
M. C.
Wittmann
,
R. N.
Steinberg
, and
E. F.
Redish
,
Activity-Based Tutorials Vol. 1: Introductory Physics
(
Wiley
, New York,
2004
).
11.
M. C.
Wittmann
,
R. N.
Steinberg
, and
E. F.
Redish
,
Activity-Based Tutorials Vol. 2: Modern Physics
(
Wiley
, New York,
2005
).
12.
D. R.
Sokoloff
,
R. K.
Thornton
, and
P. W.
Laws
,
RealTime Physics
(
Wiley
, New York, NY,
1998
).
13.
AAPT, Powerful Ideas in Physical Science (AIP, College Park, MD); aapt.org/Publications/pips.cfm.
14.
R. J.
Beichner
, “
Testing student interpretation of kinematics graphs
,”
Am. J. Phys.
62
,
750
762
(
1994
).
15.
E. F.
Redish
,
D.
Hammer
, and
A.
Elby
, “
Learning how to kearn science: Physics for bioscience majors
,” NSF Grant No. REC008-7519,
2001–2003
.
16.
D.
Hestenes
,
M.
Wells
, and
G.
Swackhamer
, “
Force concept inventory
,”
Phys. Teach.
30
(
3
),
141
166
(
1992
).
17.
R. K.
Thornton
and
D. R.
Sokoloff
, “
Assessing student learning of Newton’s laws: The force and motion conceptual evaluation and the evaluation of active learning laboratory and lecture curricula
,”
Am. J. Phys.
66
(
4
),
338
352
(
1998
).
18.
M. C.
Wittmann
,
R. N.
Steinberg
, and
E. F.
Redish
, “
Understanding and affecting student reasoning about the physics of sound
,”
Int. J. Sci. Educ.
25
(
8
),
991
1013
(
2003
).
19.
M. C.
Wittmann
,
R. N.
Steinberg
, and
E. F.
Redish
, “
Making sense of students making sense of mechanical waves
,”
Phys. Teach.
37
,
15
21
(
1999
).
20.
R. A.
Lawson
and
L. C.
McDermott
, “
Student understanding of the work-energy and impulse-momentum theorems
,”
Am. J. Phys.
55
,
811
817
(
1987
).
21.
T.
O’Brien Pride
,
S.
Vokos
, and
L. C.
McDermott
, “
The challenge of matching learning assessments to teaching goals: An example from the work-energy and impulse-momentum theorems
,”
Am. J. Phys.
66
,
147
156
(
1998
).
22.
L. C.
McDermott
and The Physics Education Group at the University of Washington,
Physics by Inquiry
(
Wiley
, New York,
1996
).
23.
G. M.
Novak
,
E. T.
Patterson
,
A. D.
Gavrin
, and
W.
Christian
,
Just-in-Time-Teaching: Blending Active Learning with Web Technology
(
Prentice Hall
, Upper Saddle River, NJ,
1999
).
24.
W.
Christian
and
M.
Belloni
,
Physlets: Teaching Physics with Interactive Curricular Material
(
Prentice Hall
, Upper Saddle River, NJ,
2001
).
25.
L. C.
McDermott
and
E. F.
Redish
, “
Resource letter PER-1: Physics education research
,”
Am. J. Phys.
67
,
755
767
(
1999
).
26.
B. A.
Thacker
,
U.
Ganiel
, and
D.
Boys
, “
Macroscopic phenomena and microscopic processes: Student understanding of transients in direct current electric circuits
,”
Am. J. Phys.
67
,
S25
S31
(
1999
).
27.
N. M.
Gillespie
, “
Knowing thermodynamics: A study of students’ collective argumentation in an undergraduate physics course
,” Ph.D. dissertation,
University of California
, Berkeley,
2004
.
28.
D. E.
Trowbridge
and
L. C.
McDermott
, “
Investigations of student understanding of the concept of velocity in one dimension
,”
Am. J. Phys.
48
,
1020
1028
(
1980
).
29.
D. E.
Trowbridge
and
L. C.
McDermott
, “
Investigations of students’ understanding of the concept of acceleration in one dimension
,”
Am. J. Phys.
49
,
242
253
(
1981
).
30.
J.
Minstrell
, “
Explaining the ‘at rest’ condition of an object
,”
Phys. Teach.
20
,
10
14
(
1982
).
31.
F.
Reif
and
S.
Allen
, “
Cognition for interpreting scientific concepts: A study of acceleration
,”
Cogn. Instruct.
9
(
1
),
1
44
(
1992
).
32.
A. A.
diSessa
, “
Knowledge in Pieces
,” in
Constructivism in the Computer Age
, edited by
G.
Forman
 et al (
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
, Hillsdale, NJ,
1988
), pp.
49
70
.
33.
D. E.
Brown
and
J.
Clement
, “
Overcoming misconceptions via analogical reasoning: Abstract transfer versus explanatory model construction
,”
Instr. Sci.
18
,
237
261
(
1989
).
34.
D.
Dykstra
, “
Why teach kinematics? Part I
,” www.boisestate.edu/physics/dykstra/Dyks.html.
35.
D.
Dykstra
, “
Why teach kinematics? Part II
,” www.boisestate.edu/physics/dykstra/Dyks.html.
36.
D.
Hammer
and
A.
Elby
, “
Tapping epistemological resources for learning physics
,”
J. Learn. Sci.
12
(
1
),
53
91
(
2003
).
37.
R. K.
Thornton
, personal communication.
38.
J. C.
Owen
,
S. A.
Norton
,
K.
Maasch
, and
M. C.
Wittmann
, “
Design, implementation, and assessment of an earth systems science course for secondary teachers
,”
J. Geoscience Educ.
52
(
4
) (
2004
); http://www.nagt.org/nagt/jge/abstracts/sep04.html#v52p379.
39.
N. D.
Finkelstein
,
W. K.
Adams
,
C. J.
Keller
,
P. B.
Kohl
,
K. K.
Perkins
,
N. S.
Podolefsky
,
S.
Reid
, and
R.
LeMaster
, “
When learning about the real world is better done virtually: A study of substituting computer simulations for laboratory equipment
,”
Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res.
1
(
1
),
010103
1
(
2005
).
AAPT members receive access to the American Journal of Physics and The Physics Teacher as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.