We present evidence that although students’ mathematical skills in introductory calculus-based physics classes may not be readily applied in physics contexts, these students have strong mathematical resources on which to build effective instruction. Our evidence is based on clinical interviews of problem solving in electrostatics, which are analyzed using the framework of Sherin’s symbolic forms. We find that students use notions of “dependence” and “parts-of-a-whole” to successfully guide their work, even in novel situations. We also present evidence that students’ naive conceptions of the limit may prevent them from viewing integrals as sums.

1.
Andrea A.
diSessa
, “
Toward an epistemology of physics
,”
Cogn. Instruct.
10
,
105
226
(
1993
).
2.
David
Hammer
, “
Student resources for learning introductory physics
,”
Am. J. Phys.
68
,
S52
S59
(
2000
).
3.
David
Hammer
,
Andy
Elby
,
Rachel
Scherr
, and
Joe
Redish
, “
Resources, Framing and Transfer
,” in
Transfer of Learning from a Modern Multidisciplinary Perspective
, edited by
Jose
Mestre
(
Information Age Publishing
, Greenwich, CT,
2005
).
4.
Bruce L.
Sherin
, “
How students understand physics equations
,”
Cogn. Instruct.
19
,
479
541
(
2001
).
5.
Joan
Ferrini-Mundy
and
Karen
Graham
, “
An overview of the calculus curriculum reform effort: Issues for learning, teaching, and curriculum development
,”
Am. Math. Monthly
98
,
627
635
(
1991
).
6.
A.
Orton
, “
Students’ understanding of integration
,”
Educ. Stud. Math.
14
,
1
18
(
1983
).
7.
Patrick. W.
Thompson
, “
Images of rate and operational understanding of the fundamental theorem of calculus
,”
Educ. Stud. Math.
26
,
229
274
(
1994
).
8.
S.
Vinner
, “
The avoidance of visual considerations in calculus students
,”
Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics
11
,
149
156
(
1999
).
9.
L. C.
McDermott
, “
Oersted Medal Lecture 2001: Physics education research: The key to student learning
,”
Am. J. Phys.
69
,
1127
1137
(
2001
).
10.
B.
Cornu
, “
Limits
,” in
Advanced Mathematical Thinking
, edited by
David
Tall
(
Kluwer Academic
, Boston,
1991
), pp.
153
166
.
11.
Lillian C.
McDermott
and
Edward F.
Redish
, “
RL-PER1: Resource letter on physics education research
,”
Am. J. Phys.
67
,
755
772
(
1999
), and references therein.
12.
David
Tall
and
Shlomo
Vinner
, “
Concept image and concept definition in mathematics with particular reference to limits and continuity
,”
Educ. Stud. Math.
12
,
151
169
(
1981
).
13.
Steven
Williams
, “
Models of limits in college calculus students
,”
J. Res. Math. Educ.
22
,
219
236
(
1991
).
14.
Michael
Oehrtmam
, Ph.D. thesis,
University of Texas
, Austin,
2002
.
15.
D. O.
Tall
and
R. L. E.
Schwarzenberger
, “
Conflicts in the learning of real numbers and limits
,”
Math. Teach.
82
,
44
49
(
1978
).
16.
Randall
Harrington
, Ph.D. thesis,
University of Washington
,
1995
.
17.
Stephen
Kanim
, Ph.D. thesis,
University of Washington
,
1999
.
18.
Michael C.
Wittmann
, “
The object coordination class applied to wavepulses: Analysing student reasoning in wave physics
,”
Int. J. Sci. Educ.
24
,
97
118
(
2002
).
19.
K. A.
Marrongelle
,
Kelly
Black
, and
Dawn
Meredith
, “
Studio Calculus and Physics: Interdisciplinary Mathematics with Active Learning
,” in
Integrated Mathematics: Choices and Challenges
, edited by
Sue Ann
McGraw
(
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics
, Reston, VA,
2003
), pp.
103
115
.
20.
David
Halliday
,
Robert
Resnick
, and
Jearl
Walker
,
Fundamentals of Physics
(
Wiley
, New York,
2003
), 6th ed.;
Raymond A.
Serway
and
Robert J.
Beichner
,
Physics for Scientists and Engineers
(
Saunders College Publishing
, Fort Worth,
2000
), 5th ed.
21.
There was a typographical error in this question. The electric field should have been E(t)=8sin(5×106t)NC. As it stands, the electric field is essentially 0 during the very short time inside the plates. Only Georgette realized this error and was somewhat confused by it.
22.
Patrick W.
Thompson
and
Jason
Silverman
, “
The Concept of Accumulation in Calculus
,” in
Making the Connection: Research and Teaching in Undergraduate Mathematics
, edited by
M.
Carlson
and
C.
Rasmussen
(
Mathematical Association of America
, Washington, DC) (in press).
23.
Corinne A.
Manogue
,
Kerry
Browne
,
Tevian
Dray
, and
Barbara
Edwards
, “
Why is Ampere’s law so hard? A look at middle-division physics
,”
Am. J. Phys.
74
,
344
350
(
2006
).
24.
E. F.
Redish
, “
Problem Solving and the Use of Math in Physics Courses
,” in
Proceedings of the Conference on World View on Physics Education 2005: Focusing on Change
, Delhi, India. (to be published), arXiv:physics/0608268.
25.
The tutorial and homework are available at ⟨pubpages.unh.edu/∼dawnm/connectm&m.html⟩.
26.
Arnold B.
Aarons
,
A Guide to Introductory Physics Teaching
(
Wiley
, New York,
1990
).
27.
Edward F.
Redish
,
Rachel E.
Scherr
, and
Jonathan
Tuminaro
, “
Reverse-engineering the solution of a simple physics problem: Why learning physics is harder than it looks
,”
Phys. Teach.
44
,
293
300
(
2006
).
28.
Jonathan
Tuminaro
, Ph.D. thesis,
University of Maryland
, College Park (
2004
).
AAPT members receive access to the American Journal of Physics and The Physics Teacher as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.