Quantum mechanics is counterintuitive, difficult to visualize, mathematically challenging, and abstract. The Physics Education Technology (PhET) Project now includes 18 simulations on quantum mechanics designed to improve the learning of this subject. These simulations include several key features to help students build mental models and intuition about quantum mechanics: visual representations of abstract concepts and microscopic processes that cannot be directly observed, interactive environments that directly couple students’ actions to animations, connections to everyday life, and efficient calculations so that students can focus on the concepts rather than the mathematics. Like all PhET simulations, these are developed using the results of research and feedback from educators, and are tested in student interviews and classroom studies. This article provides an overview of the PhET quantum simulations and their development. We also describe research demonstrating their effectiveness and discuss some insights about student thinking.
REFERENCES
1.
J.
Petri
and H.
Niedderer
, “A learning pathway in high-school level quantum atomic physics
,” Int. J. Sci. Educ.
20
, 1075
–1088
(1998
).2.
A.
Mashhadi
and B.
Woolnough
, “Insights into students’ understanding of quantum physics: Visualizing quantum entities
,” Eur. J. Phys.
20
, 511
–516
(1999
).3.
A. G.
Harrison
and D. F.
Treagust
, “Learning about atoms, molecules, and chemical bonds: A case study of multiple-model use in grade 11 chemistry
,” Sci. Educ.
84
, 352
–381
(2000
).4.
R. V.
Olsen
, “Introducing quantum mechanics in the upper secondary school: A study in Norway
,” Int. J. Sci. Educ.
24
, 565
–574
(2002
).5.
K.
Taber
, “Learning quantum barriers to stimulating transitions in student understanding of orbital ideas
,” Sci. Educ.
89
, 94
–116
(2005
).6.
R. N.
Steinberg
, G. E.
Oberem
, and L. C.
McDermott
, “Development of a computer-based tutorial on the photoelectric effect
,” Am. J. Phys.
64
, 1370
–1379
(1996
).7.
M. C.
Wittmann
, R. N.
Steinberg
, and E. F.
Redish
, “Investigating student understanding of quantum physics: Spontaneous models of conductivity
,” Am. J. Phys.
70
, 218
–226
(2002
).8.
M. C.
Wittmann
, J. T.
Morgan
, and L.
Bao
, “Addressing student models of energy loss in quantum tunneling
,” Eur. J. Phys.
26
, 939
–950
(2005
).9.
S. B.
McKagan
and C. E.
Wieman
, “Exploring student understanding of energy through the Quantum Mechanics Conceptual Survey
,” in 2005 Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings
, edited by P.
Heron
, L.
McCullough
, and J.
Marx
(AIP Press
, Melville, NY
, 2006
), pp. 65
–68
.10.
S.
Vokos
, P. S.
Schaffer
, B. S.
Ambrose
, and L. C.
McDermott
, “Student understanding of the wave nature of matter: Diffraction and interference of particles
,” Am. J. Phys.
68
, S42
–S51
(2000
).11.
L.
Bao
and E. F.
Redish
, “Understanding probabilistic interpretations of physical systems: A prerequisite to learning quantum physics
,” Am. J. Phys.
70
, 210
–217
(2002
).12.
I. D.
Johnston
, K.
Crawford
, and P. R.
Fletcher
, “Student difficulties in learning quantum mechanics
,” Int. J. Sci. Educ.
20
, 427
–446
(1998
).13.
C.
Singh
, “Student understanding of quantum mechanics
,” Am. J. Phys.
69
, 885
–895
(2001
).14.
H.
Sadaghiani
and L.
Bao
, “Student difficulties in understanding probability in quantum mechanics
,” in 2005 Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings
, edited by P.
Heron
, L.
McCullough
, and J.
Marx
(AIP Press
, Melville, NY
, 2006
), pp. 61
–64
.15.
D. T.
Brookes
and E.
Etkina
, “Do our words really matter? Case studies from quantum mechanics
,” in 2005 Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings
, edited by P.
Heron
, L.
McCullough
, and J.
Marx
(AIP Press
, Melville, NY
, 2006
), pp. 57
–60
.16.
C.
Singh
, “Assessing and improving student understanding of quantum mechanics
,” in 2005 Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings
, edited by P.
Heron
, L.
McCullough
, and J.
Marx
(AIP Press
, Melville, NY
, 2006
), pp. 69
–72
.17.
R.
Müller
and H.
Wiesner
, “Teaching quantum mechanics on an introductory level
,” Am. J. Phys.
70
, 200
–209
(2002
).18.
D. A.
Zollman
, N. S.
Rebello
, and K.
Hogg
, “Quantum mechanics for everyone: Hands-on activities integrated with technology
,” Am. J. Phys.
70
, 252
–259
(2002
).19.
S. B.
McKagan
, K. K.
Perkins
, and C. E.
Wieman
, “Reforming a large lecture modern physics course for engineering majors using a PER-based design
,” in 2006 Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings
, edited by L.
McCullough
, P.
Heron
, and L.
Hsu
(AIP Press
, Melville, NY
, 2007
), pp. 34
–37
.20.
B. S.
Ambrose
, “A repeat performance? Challenges in developing robust conceptual understanding in quantum mechanics
,” in 2004 Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings
, edited by J.
Marx
, P.
Heron
, and S.
Franklin
(AIP Press
, Melville, NY
, 2005
), pp. 27
–30
.21.
M. C.
Wittmann
, R. N.
Steinberg
, E. F.
Redish
, and the University of Maryland Physics Education Research Group
, Activity-Based Tutorials: Modern Physics
(Wiley
, New York
, 2005
), Vol. 2
.22.
M. C.
Wittmann
, “Lab-tutorials für den quantenphysik unterricht
,” Prax. Naturwiss., Phys. Sch.
55
, 16
–21
(2006
).23.
C.
Singh
, M.
Belloni
, and W.
Christian
, “Improving students’ understanding of quantum mechanics
,” Phys. Today
59
(8
), 43
–49
(2006
).24.
N.
Finkelstein
, W. K.
Adams
, C. J.
Keller
, P. B.
Kohl
, K. K.
Perkins
, N. S.
Podolefsky
, S.
Reid
, and R.
LeMaster
, “When learning about the real world is better done virtually: A study of substituting computer simulations for laboratory equipment
,” Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res.
1
, 010103
–1
(2005
).25.
W. K.
Adams
, S.
Reid
, R.
LeMaster
, S. B.
McKagan
, K. K.
Perkins
, and C. E.
Wieman
, “A study of educational simulations Part I—Engagement and learning
,” J. Interactive Learning Research
19
(3), (2008), ⟨phet.colorado.edu/web-pages/publications/PhET%20interview%20Paper%20Part%20I.pdf⟩.26.
W. K.
Adams
, S.
Reid
, R.
LeMaster
, S. B.
McKagan
, K. K.
Perkins
, and C. E.
Wieman
, “A study of educational simulations Part II—interface design
,” J. Interactive Learning Research
19
(4), (2008), ⟨phet.colorado.edu/web-pages/publications/PhET%20interview%20Paper%20Part%20II.pdf⟩.27.
A.
Goldberg
, H. M.
Schey
, and J. L.
Schwartz
, “Computer-generated motion pictures of one-dimensional quantum-mechanical transmission and reflection phenomena
,” Am. J. Phys.
35
, 177
–186
(1967
).28.
D.
Brandt
, J. R.
Hiller
, and M. J.
Moloney
, Modern Physics Simulations: The Consortium for Upper-Level Physics Software
(Wiley
, Hoboken, NJ
, 1995
).29.
J. R.
Hiller
, I. D.
Johnson
, and D. F.
Styer
, Quantum Mechanics Simulations: The Consortium for Upper-Level Physics Software
(Wiley
, Hoboken, NJ
, 1995
).30.
B.
Thaller
, Visual Quantum Mechanics
(Springer
, New York
, 2000
).31.
M.
Belloni
, W.
Christian
, and A. J.
Cox
, Physlet Quantum Physics: An Interactive Introduction
(Pearson Prentice Hall
, Upper Saddle River, NJ
, 2006
).32.
35.
J. D.
Bransford
, A. L.
Brown
, and R. R.
Cocking
, How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School
(National Academy Press
, Washington, DC
, 1999
).36.
37.
K.
Perkins
, W.
Adams
, M.
Dubson
, N.
Finkelstein
, S.
Reid
, C.
Wieman
, and R.
LeMaster
, “PhET: Interactive simulations for teaching and learning physics
,” Phys. Teach.
44
, 18
–23
(2006
).38.
C. E.
Wieman
and K. K.
Perkins
, “A powerful tool for teaching science
,” Nat. Phys.
2
, 290
–292
(2006
).39.
C. E.
Wieman
, K. K.
Perkins
, and W. K.
Adams
, “Oersted medal lecture: Interactive simulations for teaching physics: What works, what doesn’t, and why
,” Am. J. Phys.
(2008
).40.
The PhET quantum simulations are available at ⟨phet.colorado.edu/quantum⟩.
41.
S. B.
McKagan
, K. K.
Perkins
, and C. E.
Wieman
, “A deeper look at student learning of quantum mechanics: The case of tunneling
,” in preparation, arXiv:physics/0802.3194.43.
C.
Henderson
and M.
Dancy
, “Physics faculty and educational researchers: Divergent expectations as barriers to the diffusion of innovations
,” Am. J. Phys.
76
, 79
–91
(2008
).46.
S. B.
McKagan
, W.
Handley
, K. K.
Perkins
, and C. E.
Wieman
, “A research-based curriculum for teaching the photoelectric effect
,” arXiv:physics/0706.2165.47.
B.
Ambrose
, “Investigation of student understanding of the wavelike properties of light and matter
,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Washington
, 1999
.48.
49.
50.
W. K.
Adams
, K. K.
Perkins
, N.
Podolefsky
, M.
Dubson
, N. D.
Finkelstein
, and C. E.
Wieman
, “A new instrument for measuring student beliefs about physics and learning physics: The Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey
,” Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res.
2
, 010101
–1
(2006
).51.
The percentages add up to more than 100% because some students made more than one type of comment.
52.
© 2008 American Association of Physics Teachers.
2008
American Association of Physics Teachers
AAPT members receive access to the American Journal of Physics and The Physics Teacher as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.
