An important finding of physics and astronomy education research (PAER) is that traditional, transmission-based instructional approaches are not effective in promoting meaningful student learning. Instead, PAER research suggests that physics and astronomy should be taught using more interactive instructional methods. These ways of teaching require significant changes in the way faculty think about teaching and learning and corresponding changes in their teaching behavior. Although the research base and corresponding pedagogies and strategies are well documented and widely available, widespread changes in physics and astronomy teaching at the college level has yet to occur. The Workshop for New Physics and Astronomy Faculty has been working to address this problem since 1996. This workshop, which is jointly administered by the American Association of Physics Teachers, the American Astronomical Society, and the American Physical Society, has attracted approximately 25% of all new physics and astronomy faculty each year to a four-day workshop designed to introduce new faculty to PAER-based instructional ideas and materials. This paper describes the impact of the Workshop as measured by surveys of Workshop participants and physics and astronomy department chairs. The results indicate that the Workshop is successful in meeting its goals and might be significantly contributing to the spread and acceptance of PAER-based instructional ideas and materials.

1.
R.
Ivie
,
S.
Guo
, and
A.
Carr
,
2004 Physics & Astronomy Academic Workforce
(
American Institute of Physics
, College Park, MD,
2005
).
2.
R.
Ivie
and
K.
Stowe
, 1997-98 Academic Workforce Report (American Institute of Physics, College Park, MD,
1999
).
3.
R.
Ivie
,
K.
Stowe
, and
R.
Czujko
, 2000 Physics Academic Workforce Report (American Institute of Physics, College Park, MD,
2001
).
4.
R.
Ivie
,
K.
Stowe
, and
K.
Nies
, 2002 Physics Academic Workforce Report (American Institute of Physics, College Park, MD,
2003
).
5.
Although now somewhat dated, references to many of these curricular packages and strategies can be found in
L. C.
McDermott
and
E. F.
Redish
, “
Resource Letter: PER-1: Physics education research
,”
Am. J. Phys.
67
(
9
),
755
767
(
1999
).
6.
J.
Handelsman
,
D.
Ebert-May
,
R.
Beichner
,
P.
Bruns
,
A.
Chang
,
R.
DeHaan
,
J.
Gentile
,
S.
Lauffer
,
J.
Stewart
,
S. M.
Tilghman
, and
W. B.
Wood
, “
Education: Scientific teaching
,”
Science
304
,
521
522
(
2004
).
8.
C. G.
Schneider
, “
President’s message: PFF – the road ahead
,”
Liberal Educ.
88
,
2
3
(
2002
).
10.
D.
Alpert
, “
Performance and paralysis: The organizational context of the American research university
,”
J. Higher Educ.
56
,
241
281
(
1985
).
11.
A.
Saroyan
and
C.
Amundsen
,
Rethinking Teaching in Higher Education: From a Course Design Workshop to a Faculty Development Framework
(
Stylus
, Sterling, VA,
2004
).
12.
E.
Seymour
, “
Tracking the process of change in US undergraduate education in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology
,”
Sci. Educ.
86
,
79
105
(
2001
).
13.
M. D.
Sorcinelli
and
A. E.
Austin
,
Developing New and Junior Faculty
(
Jossey-Bass
, San Francisco, CA,
1992
).
14.
R.
Boice
,
The New Faculty Member: Supporting and Fostering Professional Development
(
Jossey-Bass
, San Francisco, CA,
1990
).
15.
R.
Boice
, “
New faculty as teachers
,”
J. Higher Educ.
62
,
150
173
(
1991
).
16.
M.
Weimer
and
L. F.
Lenze
, “
Instructional interventions: A review of the literature on efforts to improve instruction
,” in
Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research
, edited by
J. C.
Smart
(
Agathon
, New York,
1991
), Vol.
VII
, pp.
294
333
.
17.
J.
Levinson-Rose
and
R. J.
Menges
, “
Improving college teaching: A critical review of research
,”
Rev. Educ. Res.
51
,
403
434
(
1981
), p. 419.
18.
J. D.
Emerson
and
F.
Mosteller
, “
Development programs for college faculty: Preparing for the twenty-first century
,” in
Educational Media and Technology Yearbook 2000
, edited by
R. M.
Branch
and
M. A.
Fitzgerald
(
Libraries Unlimited, Inc.
, Englewood, CO,
2000
), Vol.
25
, p.
29
.
19.
C.
Henderson
and
M.
Dancy
, “
Physics faculty and educational researchers: Divergent expectations as barriers to the diffusion of innovations
,” preprint.
20.
J.
Foertsch
,
S. B.
Millar
,
L.
Squire
, and
R.
Gunter
,
Persuading Professors: A Study of the Dissemination of Educational Reform in Research Institutions
(
University of Wisconsin-Madison
, LEAD Center, Madison,
1997
).
21.
Warren Hein, personal communication, June 11,
2007
.
22.
C.
Henderson
, External Evaluator Report, New Physics and Astronomy Faculty Workshop.⟨http://homepages.wmich.edu/~chenders/Publications/NFW%20Evaluation%20Report%20July%202007.pdf
23.
E.
Mazur
,
Peer Instruction: A User’s Manual
(
Prentice–Hall
, Upper Saddle River, NJ,
1997
).
24.
C.
Henderson
and
M.
Dancy
, “
When one instructor’s interactive classroom activity is another’s lecture: Communication difficulties between faculty and educational researchers
,” talk at the
American Association of Physics Teachers Winter Meeting
, Albuquerque, NM,
2005
.
25.
Astronomy only became an explicit part of the New Faculty Workshop in 2001. The relatively high number of faculty who report little or no knowledge of the astronomy tutorials is at least partially the result of a lack of exposure to this instructional strategy at the Workshop. In addition, many of the Workshop attendees are not be expected to teach astronomy and, thus might not be interested in such techniques.
AAPT members receive access to the American Journal of Physics and The Physics Teacher as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.