We compare the effectiveness of a first implementation of peer instruction (PI) in a two-year college with the first PI implementation at a top-tier four-year research institution. We show how effective PI is for students with less background knowledge and what the impact of PI methodology is on student attrition in the course. Results concerning the effectiveness of PI in the college setting replicate earlier findings: PI-taught students demonstrate better conceptual learning and similar problem-solving abilities than traditionally taught students. However, not previously reported are the following two findings: First, although students with more background knowledge benefit most from either type of instruction, PI students with less background knowledge gain as much as students with more background knowledge in traditional instruction. Second, PI methodology is found to decrease student attrition in introductory physics courses at both four-year and two-year institutions.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
November 2008
November 01 2008
Peer instruction: From Harvard to the two-year college
Nathaniel Lasry;
Nathaniel Lasry
Physics Department,
John Abbott College
, Montreal, Qc H9X 3L9, Canada and School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University
, 9 Oxford Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138
Search for other works by this author on:
Eric Mazur;
Eric Mazur
School of Engineering and Applied Sciences,
Harvard University
, 9 Oxford Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138 and Department of Physics, Harvard University
, 9 Oxford Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138
Search for other works by this author on:
Jessica Watkins
Jessica Watkins
School of Engineering and Applied Sciences,
Harvard University
, 9 Oxford Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138
Search for other works by this author on:
Am. J. Phys. 76, 1066–1069 (2008)
Article history
Received:
November 30 2007
Accepted:
August 15 2008
Citation
Nathaniel Lasry, Eric Mazur, Jessica Watkins; Peer instruction: From Harvard to the two-year college. Am. J. Phys. 1 November 2008; 76 (11): 1066–1069. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2978182
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your InstitutionPay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Citing articles via
Related Content
The effect of grading incentive on student discourse in Peer Instruction
Am. J. Phys. (August 2006)
Sarah Frances Whiting, pioneer of laboratory instruction in astronomy
Am. J. Phys. (June 2023)
Losing it: The Influence of Losses on Individuals’ Normalized Gains
AIP Conference Proceedings (October 2010)
Effective variations of peer instruction: The effects of peer discussions, committing to an answer, and reaching a consensus
Am. J. Phys. (August 2016)
Peer Instruction: Results from a Range of Classrooms
The Physics Teacher (April 2002)