We comment on an analysis by Qureshi of an experiment proposed by Popper and show that an analysis based solely on conventional nonrelativistic quantum mechanics is sufficient to exclude the possibility of subluminal or superluminal communication. That is, local operations cannot be employed to transmit information.
REFERENCES
1.
Tabish
Qureshi
, “Understanding Popper’s experiment
,” Am. J. Phys.
73
, 541
–544
(2005
).2.
K. R.
Popper
, Quantum Theory and the Schism in Physics
(Hutchinson
, London
, 1982
), pp. 27
–29
.3.
K. R.
Popper
, “Realism in quantum mechanics and a new version of the EPR experiment
,” in Open Questions in Quantum Physics
, edited by G.
Tarozzi
and A.
van der Merwe
(Reidel
, Dordrecht
, 1985
).4.
Asher
Peres
, “Classical interventions in quantum systems. II: Relativistic invariance
,” Phys. Rev. A
61
, 022117
–1
(2000
).5.
6.
Tabish
Qureshi
, private communication, June 16, 2005
.7.
8.
D.
Bruss
, G. M.
DAriano
, C.
Macchiavello
, and M. F.
Sacchi
, “Approximate quantum cloning and the impossibility of superluminal information transfer
,” Phys. Rev. A
62
, 062302
–1
(2000
).9.
Asher Peres, “
Opposite momenta lead to opposite directions
,” Am. J. Phys.
68
, 991
–992
(2000
).10.
N. D.
Mermin
, “From cbits to qubits: Teaching computer scientists quantum mechanics
,” Am. J. Phys.
71
, 23
–30
(2003
),especially the discussion in Sec. VI of the Born rule. See also the corresponding discussion in
E.
Gerjuoy
, “Shor’s factoring algorithm and modern cryptography. An illustration of the capabilities inherent in quantum computers
,” Am. J. Phys.
73
, 521
–540
(2005
), Sec. III B2.11.
12.
See, for example,
W.
Heitler
, The Quantum Theory of Radiation
(Clarendon Press
, Oxford, 1954
), pp. 38
ff.© 2006 American Association of Physics Teachers.
2006
American Association of Physics Teachers
AAPT members receive access to the American Journal of Physics and The Physics Teacher as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.
