We investigate if the gender gap in conceptual understanding in an introductory university physics course can be reduced by using interactive engagement methods that promote in-class interaction, reduce competition, foster collaboration, and emphasize conceptual understanding. To this end we analyzed data from the introductory calculus-based physics course for non-majors at Harvard University taught traditionally or using different degrees of interactive engagement. Our results show that teaching with certain interactive strategies not only yields significantly increased understanding for both males and females, but also reduces the gender gap. In the most interactively taught courses, the pre-instruction gender gap was gone by the end of the semester.
REFERENCES
1.
R.
Ivie
and K.
Stowe
, “Women in Physics, 2000
,” AIP Report R-430, College Park, MD, 2000
⟨http://www.aip.org/statistics/trends/wmtrends.htm⟩.2.
J. B.
Kahle
and J.
Meece
, “Research on gender issues in the classroom
,” in Handbook of Research on Science Teaching and Learning
, edited by D. L.
Gabel
(Macmillan
, New York
, 1994
), pp. 542
–557
.3.
I. V. S.
Mullis
, M. O.
Martin
, E. G.
Fierros
, A. L.
Goldberg
, and S. E.
Stemler
, Gender Differences in Achievement. IEA’S Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS)
(Boston College
, TIMSS International Study Center, Chestnut Hill, MA
, 2000
).4.
R. R.
Hake
, “Relationship of individual student normalized learning gains in mechanics with gender, high-school physics, and pretest scores on mathematics and spatial visualization
,” physics∕0106087.5.
A.
Zohar
and D.
Sela
, “Her physics, his physics: Gender issues in Israeli advanced placement physics classes
,” Int. J. Sci. Educ.
25
(2
), 245
–268
(2003
).6.
G. L.
Erickson
and L. J.
Erickson
, “Females and science achievement: Evidence, explanations, and implications
,” Sci. Educ.
68
(2
), 63
–89
(1984
).7.
P.
Labudde
, W.
Herzog
, M. P.
Neuenschwander
, E.
Violi
, and C.
Gerber
, “Girls and physics: Teaching and learning strategies tested by classroom interventions in grade
,” Int. J. Sci. Educ.
22
(2
), 143
–157
(2000
).8.
L.
McCullough
, “A gender context for the Force Concept Inventory
,” Paper presented at the winter meeting of the American Association of Physics Teachers
, San Diego, CA, 2001
(unpublished).9.
J.
Taylor
, “Sexist bias in physics textbooks
,” Phys. Educ.
14
(5
), 277
–280
(1979
).10.
L.
Danzl-Tauer
, “The relationship between intervention, equity, and excellence in rural high school biology classrooms
,” Ph.D. dissertation, Purdue University
, 1990
.Results described in
J. B.
Kahle
and J.
Meece
, “Research on gender issues in the classroom
,” in Handbook of Research on Science Teaching and Learning
, edited by D. L.
Gabel
(Macmillan
, New York
, 1994
), pp. 542
–557
.11.
A.
Kitchenham
, “Vive la difference: Gender, motivation, and achievement
,” School Libraries in Canada
22
(2
), 34
–37
, 44 (2002
);A.
Kitchenham
, “Vive la difference: Gender, motivation, and achievement
,” School Libraries in Canada
22
, 44
(2002
).12.
P.
Laws
, P.
Rosborough
, and F.
Poodry
, “Women’s responses to an activity-based introductory physics program
,” Am. J. Phys.
67
(7
), S32
–S37
(1999
).13.
M.
Schneider
, “Encouragement of women physics majors at grinnell college: A case study
,” Phys. Teach.
39
(5
), 280
–282
(2001
).14.
B.
Smail
, “Organizing the curriculum to fit girls' interests
,” in Science for all girls?
, edited by A. Kelly (Buckingham and Philadelphia, Open University Press
, 1984
).15.
G. M.
Hilderbrand
, “Redefining achievement
,” in Equity in the Classroom: Towards Effective Pedagogy for Girls and Boys
, edited by P. F.
Murphy
and C. V.
Gipps
(Falmer and UNESCO
, Washington, DC
, 1996
), pp. 149
–171
.16.
H.
Stadler
, R.
Duit
, and G.
Benke
, “Do boys and girls understand physics differently?
,” Phys. Educ.
35
(6
), 417
–422
(2000
).17.
R.
Kimbell
, K.
Stables
, T.
Wheeler
, A.
Wosniak
, and V.
Kelly
, The assessment of performance in design and technology
(London, School Examinations and Assessment Authority, 1991), cited in D. Y.
Yip
, M. M.
Chiu
, and E. S. C.
Ho
, “Hong Kong Student Achievement in OECD-PISA Study: Gender Differences in Science Content, Literacy Skills, and Test Item Formats
,” Int. J. Sci. Math. Ed.
2(1
), 91
–106
(2004
).18.
E.
Mazur
, Peer Instruction: A User’s Manual
(Prentice Hall
, Upper Saddle River, NJ
, 1997
). Additional information and resources for Peer Instruction can be found at ⟨http://galileo.harvard.edu⟩.19.
C. H.
Crouch
and E.
Mazur
, “Peer instruction: Ten years of experience and results
,” Am. J. Phys.
69
(9
), 970
–977
(2001
).20.
L. C.
McDermott
, P. S.
Schaffer
, and the University of Washington PERG
, Tutorials in Introductory Physics
(Prentice Hall
, Upper Saddle River, NJ
, 1998
).21.
Eric
Mazur
, Introductory Physics
(to be published).22.
P.
Heller
, R.
Keith
, and S.
Anderson
, “Teaching problem solving through cooperative grouping. 1. Group versus individual problem solving
,” Am. J. Phys.
60
(7
), 627
–636
(1992
);P.
Heller
and M.
Hollabaugh
, “Teaching problem solving through cooperative grouping. 2. Designing problems and structuring groups
,” Am. J. Phys.
60
(7
), 637
–644
(1992
).23.
D.
Hestenes
, M.
Wells
, and G.
Swackhamer
. “Force Concept Inventory
,” Phys. Teach.
30
(3
), 141
–151
(1992
). Revised in 1995 by I. Halloun, R. R. Hake, E. Mosca, and D. Hestenes. The revised version appears in Ref. 18 and can be obtained from Professor Hestenes at Arizona State University.24.
R. R.
Hake
, “Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses
,” Am. J. Phys.
66
(1
), 64
–74
(1998
).25.
D.
Hestenes
and M.
Wells
, “A mechanics baseline test
,” Phys. Teach.
30
(3
), 159
–166
(1992
).26.
See EPAPS Document No. E-AJPIAS-74-003603 for tables of the Mechanics Baseline Test scores and Force Concept Inventory gains and normalized gains. This document can be reached via a direct link in the online article's HTML reference section or via the EPAPS homepage (http://www.aip.org/pubservs/epaps.html).
27.
C.
Henderson
, “Common concerns about the Force Concept Inventory
,” Phys. Teach.
40
(9
), 542
–547
(2002
).28.
I.
Halloun
and D.
Hestenes
, “Interpreting the Force Concept Inventory: A response to Huffman and Heller
,” Phys. Teach.
33
(8
), 502
–506
(1995
).© 2006 American Association of Physics Teachers.
2006
American Association of Physics Teachers
AAPT members receive access to the American Journal of Physics and The Physics Teacher as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.
