Levitation experiments with superconductors in the Meissner state are hindered by low stability except for specifically designed configurations. In contrast, magnetic force experiments with strongly pinned superconductors and permanent magnets display high stability, allowing the demonstration of striking effects, such as lateral or inverted levitation. These facts are explained by using a variational theory. Illustrations based on calculated magnetic field lines for various configurations are presented. They provide a qualitative physical understanding of the stability features.
REFERENCES
1.
J.
Wang
et al, “The first man-loading high temperature superconducting Maglev test in the world
,” Physica C
378–381
, 809
–814
(2002
).2.
A. A.
Kordyuk
, “Magnetic levitation for hard superconductors
,” J. Appl. Phys.
83
, 610
–612
(1998
).3.
E. H.
Brandt
, “Rigid levitation and suspension of high-temperature superconductors by magnets
,” Am. J. Phys.
58
, 43
–49
(1990
).4.
S.
Earnshaw
, “On the nature of the molecular forces which regulate the constitution of the luminiferous ether
,” Trans. Cambridge Philos. Soc.
7
, 97
–112
(1842
).5.
M. D.
Simon
, L. O.
Heflinger
, and A. K.
Heim
, “Diamagnetically stabilized magnet levitation
,” Am. J. Phys.
69
, 702
–713
(2001
).6.
R.
Feynman
, R. B.
Leighton
, and M.
Sands
, The Feynman Lectures on Physics
(Addison-Wesley
, Reading, MA
, 1965
), Vol. 3
.7.
8.
C. P.
Bean
, “Magnetization of high-field superconductors
,” Rev. Mod. Phys.
36
, 31
–39
(1964
).9.
In most experimental conditions, the kinetic energy of the charge carriers may be neglected because (submicron range) is much smaller than the scale of the sample (centimeters).
10.
L. C.
Davis
, E. M.
Logothetis
, and R. E.
Soltis
, “Stability of magnets levitated above superconductors
,” J. Appl. Phys.
64
, 4212
–4218
(1988
).11.
12.
L. C.
Davis
and J. R.
Reitz
, “Solution to potential problems near a conducting semi-infinite sheet or conducting disk
,” Am. J. Phys.
39
, 1255
–1265
(1971
).13.
In this work, we follow the convention for macroscopic fields: and , that is, superconducting carriers are treated as free charges with flow density .
14.
F.
Hellman
, E. M.
Gyorgy
, D. W.
Johnson
, Jr., H. M.
O’Bryan
, and R. C.
Sherwood
, “Levitation of a magnet over a flat type-II superconductor
,” J. Appl. Phys.
63
, 447
–450
(1988
).15.
W. G.
Harter
, A. M.
Hermann
, and Z. Z.
Sheng
, “Levitation effects involving high thallium based superconductors
,” Appl. Phys. Lett.
53
, 1119
–1121
(1988
).16.
A. R.
Conn
, N. I. M.
Gould
, and Ph. L.
Toint
, LANCELOT: A Fortran Package for Large-Scale Nonlinear Optimization
(Springer-Verlag
, Berlin
, 1992
).© 2006 American Association of Physics Teachers.
2006
American Association of Physics Teachers
AAPT members receive access to the American Journal of Physics and The Physics Teacher as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.
