We have developed the New Studio format of instruction for improved conceptual learning while retaining problem-solving skill development in large, first-year physics courses. This format retains the large lecture, but combines traditional recitation and laboratory instruction. The New Studio format integrates simplified laboratories with assigned homework problems to integrate conceptual and problem-solving skills. The studio format combines 2hours of lecture with 4hours of studio each week. The studio is taught for 2hours twice per week, and consists of up to 40 students working in groups of four at tables equipped with modern instructional technology and apparatus. The group setting allows for peer instruction and development of group skills. The combination of traditional lecture with the studio format enables a research-oriented physics department with a large service teaching load to implement research-based pedagogy. Student gains on the Force Concept Inventory were similar to other courses taught by interactive engagement methods.

1.
R. R.
Hake
, “
Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses
,”
Am. J. Phys.
66
,
64
74
(
1998
).
2.
P. W.
Laws
, “
Calculus-based physics without lectures
,”
Phys. Today
44
(
12
),
24
31
(
1991
).
3.
R. J.
Beichner
, “
Student-centered activities for large-enrollment university physics (SCALE UP)
,”
Proceedings of the Sigma Xi Forum on the Reform of Undergraduate Education
(
1999
), pp.
43
52
.
4.
J. M.
Wilson
, “
The CUPLE physics studio
,”
Phys. Teach.
32
,
518
523
(
1994
).
5.
D.
Halliday
,
R.
Resnick
, and
J.
Walker
,
Fundamentals of Physics
, 5th ed. (
Wiley
,
New York
,
1997
).
6.
L. C.
McDermott
and
E. F.
Redish
, “
Resource Letter: PER-1: Physics Education Research
,”
Am. J. Phys.
67
,
755
767
(
1999
);
I. A.
Halloun
and
D.
Hestenes
, “
The initial knowledge state of college physics students
,”
Am. J. Phys.
53
,
1043
1055
(
1985
);
E.
Mazur
,
Peer Instruction: A User’s Manual
(
Prentice Hall
,
Upper Saddle River, NJ
,
1997
);
R. K.
Thornton
and
D. R.
Sokoloff
, “
Learning motion concepts using real-time microcomputer-based laboratory tools
,”
Am. J. Phys.
58
,
858
867
(
1990
).
7.
R. M.
Felder
,
D. R.
Woods
,
J. E.
Stice
, and
A.
Rugarcia
, “
The future of engineering education. II. Teaching methods that work
,”
Chem. Eng. Educ.
34
,
26
39
(
2000
).
8.
J.
Cohen
,
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
, 2nd ed. (
Earlbaum
,
Hillsdale, NJ
,
1988
).
AAPT members receive access to the American Journal of Physics and The Physics Teacher as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.