Since its introduction, the normalized gain or the -factor has been widely used in assessing students’ performance in pre- and post-tests. The average -factor can be calculated using either the average scores of the class or individual student’s scores. In general, these two calculations produce different results. The nature of these two results is explored for several idealized situations. The results suggest that we may be able to utilize the difference between the two results to extract information on how the population may have changed as a result of instruction.
REFERENCES
1.
P. L.
Bonate
, Analysis of Pretest-Posttest Designs
(Chapman & Hall/CRC
, Boca Raton
, 2000
).2.
L.
Tornqvist
, P.
Vartia
, and Y. Q.
Vartia
, “How should relative change be measured?
,” Am. Stat.
39
, 43
–46
(1985
).3.
F. W.
Gery
, “Does mathematics matter?
,” in Research Papers in Economic Education
, edited by Arthur
Welsh
(Joint Council on Economic Education
, New York
, 1972
), pp. 142
–157
.4.
R. R.
Hake
, “Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses
,” Am. J. Phys.
66
(1
), 64
–74
(1998
).5.
Several unpublished reports relevant to this topic can be found at ⟨http://physics.indiana.edu/~hake/⟩.
6.
Problems in Measuring Change
, edited by C. W.
Harris
(University of Wisconsin Press
, Madison
, 1963
).7.
L. J.
Cronbach
and L.
Furby
, “How should we measure ‘change’—Or should we?
,” Psychol. Bull.
74
, 68
–80
(1970
).8.
J. D.
Marx
and K.
Cummings
, “Improved normalized gain
,” AAPT Announcer
29
(4
), 81
(1998
).© 2006 American Association of Physics Teachers.
2006
American Association of Physics Teachers
AAPT members receive access to the American Journal of Physics and The Physics Teacher as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.
